this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Doctor Who Social Club

351 readers
15 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
05-10 DW 2x05 "The Story & the Engine"
05-17 DW 2x06 "The Interstellar Song Contest"
05-24 DW 2x07 "Wish World"
05-31 DW 2x08 "The Reality War"
TBA TWB 1x01 TBA

Episode Discussion Archive


Doctor Who Wiki


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ever since the RTD2 era started, I've seen a number of people insisting that Disney is ruining the show, or that they can see the corp's fingerprints all over it, or other things to that effect. These statements have come not only from the corners of the internet that I'm completely comfortable ignoring, but also from people I respect.

My question is simple: do you think this is a real phenomenon, and if you do, can you provide some examples of what you mean? The examples can be based in fact, or purely vibes-based, I would just like you to clearly identify which it is, and if it is vibes based, what makes you feel that way.


It's probably clear by now, but I just don't see it. Nothing about the RTD2 era has screamed "studio interference" to me, nor do I get a "Disney vibe" from it (Disney is such a massive conglomerate at this point, I don't even know what that vibe would be). I guess you could point to the musical numbers as an example?

Ultimately, I feel like for better or worse, RTD has been doing the things that RTD likes to do for these past two seasons.

There is one example of Disney directly influencing the show that I'm aware of: RTD has said that in "The Church On Ruby Road", Disney felt that the Doctor needed to be introduced earlier in the story, so he wrote the scene with the Doctor "rescuing" the lady with the baby carriage. And honestly? That's a pretty good note.

Anyways, no wrong answers. Just help me understand.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nSonic@troet.cafe 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

@ValueSubtracted Well … the obvious ones may be
- singing with those goblins
- singing a musical at the end „always a twist“
- the whole ending double episode based on a pure fairytale … 7th child of a … kissing and wishing to make things come true. Here in earth. Yeah. Sure. I know, aliens landing here … I know I know but anyway for me it’s a different level 🫣
- Yasmin just being a mother having a baby with looking back to scenes we never saw this way? (1/3)

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
  • Yasmin just being a mother having a baby with looking back to scenes we never saw this way? (1/3)

That's not Disney, that's a rewrite and reshoot they had to do after they'd already shot the original ending, I think it was even reshot after the first episode had aired. They were scrambling to accommodate for Gatwa's decision to leave. IMO it was better than the original ending and they handled it well, considering the circumstances.

(I'm assuming you meant Belinda...)

[–] nSonic@troet.cafe 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

@Uruanna Oh damn - yes Belinda of course 😅
Hm. Reshootings you say? 🤔 and the best idea was to take her out of the story for the last episodes and almost completely in the final just to … meh 😒 don’t like it.

I’m sad that Ncuti is gone. If he had a bit more time … I think he had potential for a really good doctor! But maybe it was rushed from the beginning? I had the feeling that his character wasn’t really build. An episode here and there but overall? Very sad, I like him as Doctor.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What changed is only the end. The plan was, the girl really was the Doctor's kid, making Belinda a lot more important and maybe staying one more season, and Gatwa too - the kid was meant to be the future mother of Susan (I hate it) and they were planning the next season. But most of the episode before the very end was the same. Something happened with Gatwa after new years and he called it quits, that's where they reshot the final house scene, flashbacks with new mentions of the kid, and the regeneration. Yeah, Gatwa was cool, it's too bad.

[–] nSonic@troet.cafe 2 points 7 hours ago

@Uruanna Didn’t know that 🤔 now understand better what happens. I mean: it all started with the doctor searching for Belinda because he saw her(?) thousand years in her future or so. That was a nice miracle and mystery to start with - but it seems that all that was forgotten.
Now I see: it was rewritten and no time to solve this, so they mostly ignored it. Sad. 😔

[–] nSonic@troet.cafe 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There me other details and nitpicking…

Like a cute robot that could be right out of Pixar or Star Wars, the castle, a Toon-Villain that remembers a bit at the early Mickey style, maybe more… (2/3)

[–] nSonic@troet.cafe 2 points 10 hours ago

That said: I’m not sure I would call it Disneyfication - I don’t know whose idea this all was and I don’t care. I think if one likes to see a problem, it’s not Disney or Disney alone. Personally i say: I like to see more of Doctor Who - but only if some writers really have creative ideas and know how to tell a story better then a - b - LISTEN!! WE SHOWED YOU B BECAUSE ITS VERY URGENT- c 😅 (3/3)

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Disney is such a massive conglomerate at this point, I don’t even know what that vibe would be

Safe and unchallenging. Entertaining without much depth that you forget about shortly after.

To be clear I agree with you and don't think this is happening with Who, just that it is a thing to look out for.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 10 hours ago

I don't want to dispute this too much, because it's obviously true, but Disney is also making the occasional thing like "Andor", which is neither safe nor unchallenging.

But the exception proves the rule, and so on.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Nah, I agree. People who blame "Disneyification" never point to any specific thing, it's always just a general accusation of meddling, presumably with RTD's artist's vision or whatever. Plans can fail for a variety of reasons, there rarely is a big bad pulling the strings in the background.

We'll learn in a few years why Millie left early and how that apparently had a cascading effect on the show.