Even the best models fine tuned for coding still have training that was based on both good and bad examples of programming from humans. And since it's not AGI but using probability to generate the code, you're going to get crap programming logic dependent on how often such things were used and suggested by humans to other humans. Googling for an answer on how to code something pulls up all sorts of answers from many sources, but reading through them, many are terrible. An LLM doesn't know that, it just knows that humans liked some answers better than others, so GIGO.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Gorilla In Gorilla Out?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Giraffe In Giraffe Out

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

Gorilla In Giraffe Out

That would be the real trick.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (11 children)

who'd have thought that javascript and client side programming was incredibly susceptible to security flaws and deeply unsafe

load more comments (11 replies)

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

This is hilarious

[–] metacolon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a source for this?

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The original article is paywalled (I mean, registration-walled?), this summary is not

404 Media reported that 4chan users claimed to be sharing personal data and selfies from Tea after discovering an exposed database.

load more comments