Years of defunding and neglect led to this.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
283 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
6727 readers
895 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I would think most Americans that have ever been on a decent high speed train would as well. Such a better experience than the life-sucking horror of modern air travel.
Yeah, no shit... Just go to your nearest station 5 minutes before departure instead of wasting hours in security checks and at gates sounds terrific.
The last time I booked an internaional ICE from northern Germany to Bruxelles, the return connection and its follow up connection were cancelled. Best connection to get back would have been a Eurostar but tickets weren't transferable and the guy at the station wouldn't even sell me one. Had to take three short distance trains just to cross the border back to Germany, ended up about five hours late.
National trains are often a mess already but with international connections you're just lost. Booking night trains would be awesome, go to bed in Hamburg and wake up in Barcelona sounds like a dream. Instead, they all go to Vienna, which is nice to go there but isn't helpful for European connectivity as a whole.
I think that's because ÖBB/Austrian Railways is the only operator that's still investing in night trains
Yeah, no shit… Just go to your nearest station 5 minutes before departure instead of wasting hours in security checks and at gates sounds terrific.
I just wish some rail companies (DB 🤡) wouldn't fuck this up with pricing structures copied from air travel that make tickets bought on the day of travel usually prohibitively expensive.
Yeah for real, I once had to pay close to 180€ for a second class ticket from Berlin to Cologne without a seat reservation since I had to buy it only a few hours in advance.
National rail can be (at least) perfectly decent, which it is in the Netherlands. Too bad the EU wants to have it be fucked up by ‘competition’: the European Commission just now sued the Dutch state for giving the consession for the main part of the railway network to the national rail company NS.
Competition is good, but railroads are a natural monopoly - there are very few points in the world that can justify more than one set of tracks between them. Airplanes can share an airport because if someone else blocks a runway everyone else can take a different one and thus there can be competition. However if train operator B blocks a track (possibly by running a slow train) everyone else can't get through.
I'm all for competition, but you have to own your own tracks.
In the Netherlands the actual railways are owned by a separate company that was split from NS after privatisation, ProRail.
Railway competition is bullshit anyway. Neoliberal ideology pretends people constantly make informed decisions about what products they wish to buy. This is bullshit anyway, but with the railways especially. If you want to take the train to a specific place and arrive at a specific time, you will pretty much always have one option anyway. There is no choice. All the so-called ‘competition’ will do, is split up a currently contiguous network, which will probably introduce needless transfers to different train companies, where you currently have one.
So-called ‘competition’ is a disaster for what should be a public service like the railways.
load more comments
(6 replies)
And waiting 5 hours for the Deutsche Bahn to arrive. I don't really care for the prices but German trains are a nightmare to travel with
Kinda agree. Good when smooth, but when bad it’s bad.
I once booked a train months in advance. Got there and the train got cancelled. No notice just not there. I waited in queue for 30 mins. Person told me catch the next one in 1 hour.
I did. The conductor on the train came along and threaten to throw us off as it was not the correct ticket. There was just no rational option.
Otherwise I love the train.
I think these days DB gives you a ticket that works on every train if there’s a delay that will make you lose your connection which is pretty neat, but worthless if you have an international connection 💀
Night trains (the sleeper trains, not the ones where you have to sit and they go at night) sound great in theory but, after having taken one once, I'm not sure whether I'd enjoy it as a regular means of transportation.
I don't think it would scale and thus would always be pretty expensive.
I had to push my heavy luggage up high into a compartment above the beds, and navigate in very tight quarters, which works fine if you're young and have no back problems, but older folks might struggle.
I traveled in a 2-bed compartment with my partner, not sure whether I'd enjoy a cramped 6-bed compartment.
I'd much rather have a good connection in the morning and enough space on the train to use the trip as a work day (remote worker privilege, for sure) or reading day, and arrive in the evening, or, if the distance is very long, have affordable accommodation at the major train stations (not overpriced hostels with a club in the courtyard, which happened to me in Paris once).
So all in all, I feel like the sleeper train thing seems more of a touristy event-thing than a regular mode of transportation, at least if other options are available ...
I agree that if you travel with a lot of luggage the sleeper trains can be a bit cramped and there should be probably some sort of check in luggage for long distance trips.
Otherwise the compartments seem fine? I definitly prefer them over some cheap and noisy hotel right at the train station.
Barcelona in particular is a bit more difficult than the rest of Europe since we have a different rail standard in Spain.
But also Barcelona in particular is very close to the french border. So making one connection there doesn't sound too bad.
The high speed trains use standard gauge, not iberian, even in Iberia.
Let's hope trains will remain (mostly) security check-free.
Sorry to disappoint you ... in Barcelona-Sants, you have to go through one ... not the body-scan thing yet, but you have to pass your luggage through a scanner, there's a line, and you definitely have to bring some time, be there 20 min before at least ...
Yeah hence the "mostly" - travelling to/from the UK is a similar hassle. Really not the direction I'm hoping train travel to move in...
Yep, a couple of years ago all my high speed trains in Spain required security checks.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Trains are so much better in so many ways. The only mode of transport that can compete for me is boats.
smiles in Swiss
Trains are still extremely expensive when compared to flights to the same destinations. Unfortunately...
For the simple reason that planes are subsidised.
And multiply those costs for a family. Trains receive more subsidies per km in Europe but cost far more for the distance. I say this as someone who prefers trains. They’re just not that efficient compared to planes. There are solid use cases like local commuter trains and for shipping. For longer journeys, planes are a clear winner for time and cost.
planes are a clear winner for time and cost.
Artificially so.
Yes true but the range of how far train can be preferable above plane can be expanded if network better run on a European level and some big strategic investments (not that different from what France did in the 80's and 90's) on quite a few very often travelled routes. Amsterdam-Berlin is an easy example, but there are many like that. Currently on many routes the plane>train is like ~300 km, while on many that could become 600-700km with either high speed tracks or more sleeper train options or better connections. On some big routes the train>plane is up to 700-800 km already.
I think I agree directionally but I keep coming back to the efficiency issue. The longer the journey, the more inefficient the cost becomes relative to planes. It scales linearly. More and more money would need to be poured into a less and less efficient transport method. Once you hit 4-600km, flying is almost always faster. Faster tracks and trains for direct routes are INCREDIBLY expensive to build and maintain and staff.
From a fuel efficiency point of view, trains are still way more efficient, and a dense coverage of airports is also extremely expensive to maintain.
But it is also a bit unfair to compare prices of low cost airlines that use subsidized airports and tax exempted fuel to mostly state owned rail companies. A fairer comparison would be Lufthansa prices or vise versa Flixtrain.
Trains are more fuel efficient, but there is a lot more which goes into the cost of these transport modes than fuel.
I'm comparing these modes of transport because they both receive subsidies, including tax exemptions for avgas. The EU subsidises air travel (in many ways) to the tune of around €30–40 billion annually depending on what you include and what you consider to be a “subsidy.” Using similar criteria, rail is subsidised to the tune of €40–75 billion per year. So rail gets a lot more investment despite it serving 16% fewer travel kilometers per year in the EU than air travel.
Even driving alone in my car is usually cheaper for the "usual" 6-12h drive distance. Let alone with passengers or if I pickup a blablacar. I'd love to do more train but it needs to be subsidized more for the prices to become reasonable, and that I can book shortly before my trips because in my branch it's impossible for me to schedule the tickets so far ahead. I still have to deal with equipment to move around but that can be dealt with through rentals on location.
Not as long as those planes are too cheap.
I would rather see trains getting cheaper than planes getting more expensive though
Tax the planes to subsidize trains, I guess.
Remember the days when railways were exclusively government run enterprises?
Thanks to the neoliberal thieves selling off public property for short term profits, now we all can enjoy paying the ever raising prices for ever diminishing service.
AFAIK It's working for Spain and Italy
I wish it was like that here in the Netherlands. Instead we get flights that stay more or less the same price due to heavy subsidies and constant bickering about the trains. They've already announced another 10% price hike on trains for the coming year, after already raising it by 5-10% every single year for the past few years. It's insane. Add to that the extra inconvenience of having to cross borders with mediocre connections and I can understand that people don't take the train.
Maxbe we should start requiring to pay tax on aviation fuel for starters? First step on fuel sold in the EU, then for fuel used to reach the EU…
load more comments
(1 replies)
Not only the reliability is an issue, all too often, traveling a longer distance by high speed train costs a small fortune compared to a flight of the same distance.
Same with Americans. We have no decent rail here.
Most places in the US you can simplify that to "We have no rail here."
Trains are fucking rad, duh
view more: next ›