this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
380 points (93.8% liked)

solarpunk memes

4286 readers
902 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

idk the author

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago

Always lovely when we take extremely complicated problems and conclude "it's simple, we kill my favorite pet peeve"

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't fascism require a strong man leader?

I'm all for calling out destructive ideologies but if we call everything fascism then it's really going to dilute the power of the term.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Fascists typically believe in strongman leadership, but you don't have to swear allegiance to a specific strongman to be a fascist.

Eco-fascists, in particular, want a Pol Pot-style dictator, someone who will ignore laws, human rights, and common decency, in order to drastically reduce the human population and force the survivors into low-tech subsistence farming. Last I checked, no one like that is anywhere near power anywhere in the world, but that doesn't make eco-fascists any less fascist for it.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago

Humans are inherently adaptive to their environment. Our bodies obviously change, but so do our minds. Our habits, our emotional responses, our beliefs of what is possible and what is necessary, all change depending on how we grew up and the world we see around us. It takes a lifetime to unlearn all the harmful lessons of a fucked up youth, and almost everyone has had a youth fucked up to be burdened with plenty of traumas to pass on to the next generation. And that's on top of all the pain that the natural world can bring.

Humans are the dumbest possible species capable of doing science well enough to reach escape velocity from the physical limits of the ecological niche they evolved to occupy, but we're also the only species, seemingly in the nearest billion light years. We're the best shot this part of the universe has at bringing peace and joy to the natural world, including ourselves. And we are getting better at it, slowly and with many setbacks. There have been countless plagues and extinction events in the history of our world that have caused tremendous damage to the ecosystem, and we're the first to try to mitigate itself.

If we manage to change fast enough to mitigate most of the crisis we are creating, we will build a better world than could have ever have been without us. A world where mammals live unburdened by parasites and parasites live unburdened by mammal immune systems. A world where people grow strong and healthy and loving and open and connected and sharply intelligent because our environments help us grow into our best selves. Food forests, friendships, peace and prosperity and labors of love.

We already know it is possible. We already know we could belong there. We all dream of such a world no matter how strangely contorted our sense of how to get there has become. We just have to keep building our social structures to get ahead of our technological power.

[–] caligohollow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Capitalism is largely responsible for climate change. Deforestation and aquifer depletion are more directly linked to population growth. Communism wouldn’t magically make industrial agriculture go away

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No it wouldn’t but do you know the biggest contributor to CO2 emissions isn’t agriculture it’s just plain old energy usage.

Communism can most definitely help in curbing the use and extraction of fossil fuels while coordinating their replacement with renewables on a time scale that won’t doom humanity.

[–] caligohollow@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Yes I agree with you! Greed is at the heart of our predicament. I just think that the focus on CO2 emissions as the main problem is missing all of the other planetary boundaries we are crossing. There is an ecological problem in addition to the economic one. Without a doubt the economic problem has multiplied the harm of overpopulation manyfold, wealthy and exploitative countries are disproportionately to blame for the dangers we face, and we should seek new ways of living that are not inherently exploitative to minimize the loss of life as we adjust to drastic change.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, however there are different ways to do it, I think its Denmark? that gets more than double the yield/acre than the world average utilizing a lot of greenhouses and what amounts to pretty much hydroponics lite. If half of agriculture land suddenly didn't need to be used that way it would be huge.

[–] caligohollow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yep absolutely! Animal agriculture is really the main issue when it comes to this and the amount of food we would have to grow would be much less if we didn’t feed most of it to animals to eat. Our economic system could definitely incentivize there being more farmers who practice more labor intensive agriculture to improve yields and reduce soil degradation and water use.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And humans allowed capitalism to happen and have historically throughout history allowed a small handful of powerful people to take control and make everything shitty until things collapse soooooo. Capitalism is just a symptom of the disease

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Slavery is the slaves' fault because they allowed themselves to be enslaved."

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Now you're getting it

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Yes but counterpoint, capitalism is a human invention so humans (at our current state) are still the root cause

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Nah, other animals have performed transactions since before humans existed. The fact that we do it in marble halls and fancy suits doesn't make us the originators.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

And it's not like it was all utopian paradise before capitalism was invented.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We can also be the solution.

There are more options than just capitalism (and especially the weird kind of klepto-capitalism that we're falling into globally now).

[–] zurchpet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe in humanity being the solution when I see it.

So far I don't.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Humans will almost certainly bring a solution. Might not be a good one for most people though.

[–] lasers4eyes@piefed.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Humans also invented slavery, torture devices, nuclear weapons, and totalitarian regimes but we don't argue these things are "natural" or inevitable.

Just because humans created capitalism doesn't mean it's an expression of some essential or universal human trait.

[–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Such a western view: a capitalist society. We have the choice to participate in that or in a different system. Most just don’t want to give up the “I have” for “what can be”.

[–] dillekant@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

I think they did a study in the Amazon, and found that actually the Amazon is strongest when defended by indigenous populations. In fact basically all around the world, all nature is stronger when protected by humans.

I think you could make the case that before capitalism, this would also have been the case in the west. There are clear links between the growth of capitalism and witch burning.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In most of the world its participate in capitalism or go to jail, not like you can just go live in a tent in the woods without being dragged out. (Unless you live somewhere like the US which still has really big woods.)

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would love to see a post-capitalistic society... but the (class-)war toward it is long and potentially bloody.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

Not potentially. Inevitably. The ruling class will never give up authority willingly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Communist countries did some pretty heinous stuff to the environment, too. Industrialization lets us fuck things up efficiently regardless of the economic system.

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it is not Capitalism alone, but a Promethean Worldview. Authoritarian communist countries hat that one embedded as well.

This is why we need not only a change of economic system, but a shift in perception of nature as well.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] linuxsnail@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

The duck knows what's up

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is ecofascism a real ideology? I’ve never run into a single adherent.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 points 18 hours ago

Few fascists call themselves fascists. But ecofascism is mostly used as a descriptor for policies and policy priorities that are genocidal in the name of ecology, even though the proponents may be non-fascist in other areas.

For example, a neoliberal legislator may cut foreign aid because it's going to industries that emit carbon, while simultaneously cutting public transit funding to promote driving. Or a neoconservative may increase the funding for border police by a massive amount because climate change will lead to an increasing number of climate refugees.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

It's a cool-sounding buzzword to use against people concerned about the environment so you can sound like a leftist while protecting overconsumption.

[–] Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago

I don't think they advertise much irl, but you can certainly find them in the darker corners of the web. If I recall correctly, it started as an academic term to describe the emerging ideology. Some of them view the term negatively, others have embraced it.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

have you ever heard of the tragedy of the commons? because it was coined by an ecofascist and has inserted itself deep into economic theory. ecofascists are few, just like all fascists, but their ability to ply power allows them to influence world decisions by seeming reasonable while they murder, kill, and disrupt

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Humans are stupid creatures that wage wars on their own species, they are smart enough not to but they don't choose to. They are smart enough to know right or wrong but no. Their smartness is also the cause of this human nature because every human can have their own thoughts or opinion for something which causes conflict between them so my solution is "one body one mind" which is shown in so many media. But in reality it's also not perfect because individuality will be gone. Just FUCKING SUFFER ALREADY STRUGGLER

load more comments
view more: next ›