this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3075 readers
83 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, people ask chatGPT for URLs??

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lots of people use chat bots as a search engine

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Considering Google has put effort into intentionally worsening its own product, it makes sense that their chapel alternative would be something people just use.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since Bing and Google have both integrated LLMs into their search engine, it's a valid use case, according to the people who made it.

Copilot honestly doesn't suck for finding obscure support contact information for companies. Obviously you still have to verify after.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hesitantly wonder if something like Perplexity might actually be the future of search engines. It seems relatively capable of correctly interpreting search queries full of half-remembered thoughts and potentially inaccurate text into salient results. I disregard the guestimations it makes about the links it provides (of course) but the couple of times I tried it out this way, it seemed to work better than Google.

I also wonder how much energy it requires compared to whatever trash Google returns.

It does it all the time when is ask it a question involving anything with a web presence. The bullet pointed information will be partially incorrect but even worse, the links attached as references connect to something entirely unrelated and seemingly random.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] three@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] loomy@lemy.lol -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] three@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he gets all the information he needs from the stock images added to articles

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago