this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
764 points (98.4% liked)

United Kingdom

5067 readers
1060 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

from what ive been hearing from the shit going on in the uk, youve been a police state for a while now.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 hours ago

Palestine action? Never heard of them. We support Action for Palestinian.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck you, government. I do not respect your existence, and day by day, am losing respect for the laws you demand we follow. Fuck your rules.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Even if they were trying to use this sort of rule with wholesome intentions, I'm not sure how targeting groups by name instead of deed makes sense. It's like doing a healthy diet by giving up Coca-Cola by name even though Pepsi and RC have the same nutritional profile and availability. Enjoy the Whack-a-mole game!

Taken to its logical conclusion, someone should start a pro-Palestinian squad and call it the Reform Party.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The group in question broke onto an airbase and put a couple of RAF planes out of action. They crossed a red line for the government.

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -1 points 1 hour ago

Paint and crowbars. The engines will have to be stripped down and rebuilt.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -1 points 36 minutes ago (2 children)

An attack on military assets for a political aim.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

No , terrorism is targetting civilians for political aim

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 25 seconds ago

So the beheading of Lee Rigby wasn’t terrorism? Your definition doesn’t match the law or the dictionary.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Uk has the obligation to stop all military cooperation with israel that's the big crimes that people involved in should be in jail for up to 15 years

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Oh boy wait till you hear what the suffragettes were willing to do for another righteous cause, a bit over a century ago. I don't know man, maybe the government should start reexamining its policies if ordinary people among its citizens are willing to start breaking into airbase and damaging their own planes.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

They were willing to commit mass murder in London and Dublin, and to assassinate the Prime Minister. Also deeply keen on removing all Jews from the House of Commons. Things that today would indeed mark them as a terrorist organisation.

Later, Emmeline Pankhurst would found a political party with the aim of requiring all civil servants to prove their racial purity back at least 3 generations, and many of the more prominent members of the WSPU became prominent members of the British fascist movement, several being detained as a precaution during the second European fuss.

As a campaign, the WSPU was an abject failure. It put women’s votes back a decade, and Pankhurst failed to ensure that working class women were excluded from the franchise (she also wanted working class men excluded).

It was only a cataclysm the scale of WWI, and the groundwork of the suffragists working in opposition to the suffragettes, which brought votes for all.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Sounds like a classic case of both the moderates and the radicals being essential for any real change. The moderates are the hammer and the extremists are the anvil.

Society is like a bar of iron. It's stuck in its shape and resists change. Non-violent moderate protest alone is like a hammer without an anvil. You strike the iron, but the iron ignores the blow. With moderate protest alone, the established powers simply ignore the protests. They bend and duck out of the way and nothing changes. But violent groups serve as the anvil. They hold the powers that be in place and prevent them from ducking away from the hammer blow of the moderates.

Both hammer and anvil are needed. Without the violent extremists, the moderates are simply painted as extremists and ignored. With them, the moderates can actually gain traction. Moderate protest movements don't succeed unless there is also a violent wing. Moderates are only moderate if there is something to moderate against. Without the violent extremists, the moderates will be the ones labeled criminals and arrested, regardless of how extreme their tactics actually are.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 37 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

As American, I’m always so glad to see our cousins across the water follow our inane footsteps. Cheers Brits!

Cross Atlantic solidarity against fascism 🤝

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Brexit? They were first.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 83 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Always have been a police state, anti terrorism laws are ALWAYS used to silence 'dissident' voices

From 5 July 2025, it is an offence under the UK's Terrorism Act 2000 to be a member of Palestine Action,[7] fundraise for it,[8][9] wear or display items arousing reasonable suspicion of membership,[10] or if someone invites support or even "expresses an opinion or belief supportive of" Palestine Action "reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support" it.[11] These offences carry a maximum penalty of up to 14 years in prison for membership or inviting support, and up to 6 months in prison or a fine for displaying supporting items.[7][10][11][9]

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 22 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Is Palestine Action a specific movement/group or is palestine Action literally just supporting Palestine? Asking from a non UK perspective.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

It's a specific group that recently broke into an RAF base and started mucking about with the aircraft, hence why the government aren't their biggest fans.

Shortly after they did this they were designated as a terrorist group by the home office which is why public support is an offence.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Their latest action was against the planes, but they have actually been extraordinarily successful at damaging the economic machine behind the genocide through targeted and sustained sabotage campaigns against Elbit Systems weapons manufacturer and their supporters, like Barclays Bank. They have already forced the closure of two weapons factories and forced Barclays to divest. It is most likely this sustained campaign that is the real reason for the terrorist designation, though the action at Brize Norton was probably the straw that broke the camel’s back.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It certainly made proscribing them an easy sell; you won't find many people who think it's unreasonable of the government to take a dim view of sabotage.

Hopefully it won't distract too much from the bigger story of almost everyone apart from the government taking a dim view of genocide.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Sabotaging the tools of genocide should be supported by everyone who isn’t a monster.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

100 years from now, who would possibly doubt that PAC are the heroes here and labor are the villains? Genociders are never on the right side of history. These people are heroes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›