this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
171 points (85.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

35757 readers
1788 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Krejall@ttrpg.network 1 points 15 hours ago

I have an inner monologue but it's on like a half-second delay behind the actual thought. Like, I can picture a pineapple without thinking of the word pineapple first. Sometimes an entire sentence worth of meaning will form in an instant but the words don't come until I'm trying to speak or type the thought out. Sometimes I can't access a word at all, even though the concept is clear in my head and I know there is a specific word for this specific flavor of the concept.

Also, I can't rotate a cube in my mind's eye, but I can rotate a chicken.

Brains are weird.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Up to as much as more than half of all people.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yeah, my bottom half also doesn't have an inner monologue.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lack of inner monologue doesn’t mean lack of thoughts. People without an inner monologue just don’t think in words. They can still think up concepts and ideas like everyone else.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (6 children)

As someone with an inner monologue, how do they think?

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't really have an inner monologue unless I very intentionally think in words. Otherwise I just think in thoughts. 🤷‍♀️

[–] wisely@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thoughts are words though?

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you're thinking about how to throw a basketball to get it through a hoop, do you use words for that?

When you are thinking of the tune to a particular song, is that in words?

I think a lot of people overestimate the role of words in thinking. There's a lot of non-verbal thought.

[–] wisely@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I do both of those using auditory words. Can't imagine any other way and didn't know anyone else could function so differently.

Aiming a basketball: Ok let's get this in, a little higher, to the left, ok looks good.

Thinking of music: what's the lyrics to that song, I think they were....

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Really! I find that fascinating.

When I try to think of a tune (often because I haven't recalled the lyrics yet and am still trying to identify the song), I am just listening to the song in my head, trying to think of the notes and instrumentation of the next bit. I hear it, like a recording.

When I try to throw something--I said basketball because I figured it would be more relatable, but the sport I actually played was Ultimate (Frisbee, but that's a trademark, so the sport is just Ultimate)--I'm picturing the path of the disc, how it will arc on the wind, the precise angle, how to roll it off my fingers, how long it will be in the air and how far to lead the runner. It's a struggle to even come up with words for it now. It all feels visceral, the same as thinking how to reach my hand out to touch a glass on a table.

It's hard for me to imagine using words for those kinds of things because words are so vague and general. Words deal with categories we impose on the world, rather than the world as it is. Like, I learned to juggle as a teenager; I could never do that if I had to use words to think about every way to maneuver my arms and how the balls would land and so forth. I just have to reach where the ball is going to be, and throw where my hand is going to be. When I first learned Mills' Mess, I got it mixed up a bit (because I was learning from a VHS tape), and I had an extra throw in there. It took me quite a while to figure out how I mixed it up, and how to do it without that extra throw. But it was a spatial puzzle. I wouldn't even know how to convey the issue in detail without just doing it.

I dunno. I shouldn't be surprised that people's inner lives are very different, but this particular point confounds me a bit.

[–] wisely@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

For stuff that is fast paced it might be more like a word or two, like now, here, wow, ok, what now, etc. Then between that is thoughtless reflex where the body just reacts without input. It's instinct or repetition.

I can kind of actually hear a song on rare occasions usually with some effort. But it seems more like listening to myself sing it in the singers voice. Like karaoke, so it still seems like inner monologue. But the other 90% of the time it's more low effort default monologue like I am reading the lyrics out loud.

Thoughts can be words.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I just think in concepts/abstractions, I don't know how to explain it, lol.

I definitely don't think in pictures, like other person said. My mind can't create pictures out of thin air. That might be more like artists think I guess.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Having a minds eye or not is a different thing from having a inner monologue or not. People can have both, one of it or none.

Lack of an inner eye is called Aphantasia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia

I have a inner monologue but not a glimpse of an inner eye.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I am very very much not an artist, and yet also cannot imagine not being able to conjure up images of whatever.

It is fascinating how the brain works! Even if we barely understand it!

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

With imagery, or in abstracts. I have an internal monologue but not everything is a monologue. If I'm working on a project of some kind I'll usually keep a mental model of the current piece I'm working on in my head. There's no monologue attached, it's just a "working copy" of my current task.

Or for example if I'm reaching somewhere I can't see to plug in a usb port or something I'm visualizing in my head what my hand is doing, but I'm not talking myself through it.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

What everyone else here said but also keep in mind it's not binary.

If you ask me to picture an Apple on a windowsill I can kind of do that. And then if you ask me to make it polka dot, I could kind of do that. In my mind's eye though it's like it's severely myopic. It's not fuzzy but the details are not there.

When I'm drawing things, the act of me putting the marks on the paper is where the object is formed. I generally don't have a solid concept in my head that's coming out on paper. I could definitely do the 2D outline of an apple, But if you want me to perspective skew it there's no way. I might be able to draw the 2D outline and then slowly modify that to make it look more 3D, But I've got to be making changes to something already on paper rather than having something come out that's just kind of the right direction.

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

There was a thread on r/SamHarris (maybe 2 years ago) where some people without inner monologue answered questions. It was interesting to read.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In pictures, for one example

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

This is the best example, thank you.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I for once have an outer monologue. Makes for awkward moments whenever my SO hears me...

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Conservatives explained.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Buddy you can just think out loud in the shower, nobody will stop you. For that matter you can think I got a lot pretty much anywhere, though you do get looks in the grocery store I find.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just because you don't have an inner monologue doesn't mean you are incapable of thought, or showerthoughts if we're getting specific

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Correct, a lack of inner speech isn't the same as an absence of thought

It just seems like a true shower thought requires a narration to get so incredibly off tangent that it amounts to more than a simple epiphany

Like Mitch Hedberg, he is a great example of someone who let their inner speech run free

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

https://mander.xyz/post/20289088

I'd still argue against that. I've had one true showerthought and it didn't manifest as monologue, even though I do have an internal monologue. I had a concept and images for it. I spent some time trying to put it into words.

I still don't see how a showerthought (or any thought) has to have a verbal origin in the thinker's mind; I would argue any internal monologue is but a secondary step after a thought has occurred. I've never heard of anyone being unable to predict what their own internal monologue is saying, and I've never heard of anyone being unable to make quick decisions because they had to first hear a command in their minds.

[–] kirkoman@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Google gave me mostly AI slop and pop psychology, but this article is an in-depth summary of the literature on the topic of inner speech, for anyone interested (and dedicated - it’s long and very technical).

It doesn’t seem to justify dichotomizing people into those who “have it” and those who don’t. Research looks mostly focused on what cognitive or developmental purpose it serves.

Inner speech can be defined as the subjective experience of language in the absence of overt and audible articulation. This definition is necessarily simplistic: as the following will demonstrate, experiences of this kind vary widely in their phenomenology, their addressivity to others, their relation to the self, and their similarity to external speech.

So, it’s on a spectrum, highly subjective, and difficult to talk about with precision.

I personally do not normally think in words, but I certainly rehearse/relive conversations. I also complain to myself with words when I am really miserable, I think it’s comforting to “say it out loud” (inside). Do I have an inner monologue?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

A spectrum is what I'm thinking. Some people can turn it on or off at will. Complete silence or make it yap yap yap. At least that's my case.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

You just described how you monologue like a villian in your head, so yeah you're monologueing xD

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

I process thoughts visually, as typed text. It’s like a fucking ticker tape when I get going having random thoughts and I definitely experience shower thoughts.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe this statistic. The only way to study this is by asking people and I bet most simply aren't aware that they do have it. I didn't pay much attention to it either untill I started meditating and now I'm painfully aware of it.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

In addition to in-depth interviews, one of the primary methods used in the study was for volunteers to carry a timer that would go off randomly and they were to journal what they were thinking at the time

The thoughts of someone without an inner monologue are not the same as someone with an inner monologue

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Do people without an inner monologue "hear" the words they read as they read them?

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I do in monotonous "voice", yeah. Unless I know what voice somebody could have, then I use that voice instead. Usually happens when character that appears in the book also is portrayed by some actor in a movie or a video game.

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Many people do not hear as they read. In fact the skill of speed-reading depends on turning the auditory experience off:

There are three types of reading:

  • Subvocalization: sounding out each word internally, as reading to oneself. This is the slowest form of reading.
  • Auditory reading: hearing out the read words. This is a faster process.
  • Visual reading: understanding the meaning of the word, rather than sounding or hearing. This is the fastest process.

Subvocalization readers (Mental readers) generally read at approximately 250 words per minute, auditory readers at approximately 450 words per minute and visual readers at approximately 700 words per minute. Proficient readers are able to read 280–350 wpm without compromising comprehension.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading

[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nice. I'm definitely in the auditory reading category. I tend to just pick out the key words in a sentence when I am trying to read faster.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

As a child and into my teens, I had an inner monologue that was switched on all the time. After practising meditation and reading without subvocalisation, I was finally able to 'shut up' where stopping the monologue was as easy as stopping talking. Anyway, I'd encourage anyone to give it a try. Now being able to think without distracting chatter is well worth it for me.

Tangentially related, but the fox game show “1% club” is, perhaps unintentionally, a fascinating demonstration of how vastly different people think through logic problems.

The premise is the contestants go through a series of questions already asked to a sample of Americans and progress in order of how “difficult” they are based on how many got them wrong.

The interesting part comes when there can be a significant gap in what I perceive the difficulty to be between questions. Sometimes I may have trouble with an “easy” one but get a significantly “tougher” one no problem.

It seems like lunacy to me, but all it really means most times is the format or mechanics of the logic needed for the answer is just more natural to me than the majority of the sample.

[–] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I distinctly recall thinking inner monologues were a "neat idea" after seeing them on TV as a child and thinking it would be a useful skill to learn. I never did though

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

... Are you suggesting we are incapable of thought? My mind wanders just like anyone else's.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait am I confused on what an inner monologue is? Is it different from a train of thought? Do I just think I have one? Do people have a non metaphorical inner monologue where they physically hear thoughts? What percent are they in control of the thoughts?

If your mind wanders, isn't that the inner monologue?

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The inner monologue is thinking by 'hearing' your own voice 'speaking' in your mind. It's the mental equivalent of literally talking to yourself.

Do people have a non metaphorical inner monologue where they physically hear thoughts?

Yes, in the sense that they hear themselves 'voicing' out their own thoughts. If you have the ability to form images in your mind, it's like that, but with sound.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

I was today years old when I learned that many people don't have an inner monologue. The human body is so fascinating.

Oddly enough, if I don't take my ADHD meds, I tend to talk to myself out loud a lot because my inner monologue gets kind of "muffled" in the "noise" and I rely on it very heavily to think through.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›