this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
752 points (92.8% liked)

Political Memes

8779 readers
3123 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

My stance is as they say in Poland.

Not my monkeys, not my circus. I just dont care.

It doesn't affect me in the slightest, other than a minimal amount of the taxes i pay go towards treatment of their illness. Although, i find it slightly hypocritical that they are allowed to start changing gender before 18. Would seem that many other things should be allowed before 18 aswell in that case.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I can't speak as to Polish law, but kids are allowed to do quite a bit before the age of 18 in the US. Going on puberty blockers - to delay a puberty that could damn well be an irreversible scar on the psyche - is hardly an opening for a shakeup of the legal position of minors.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Not Polish, its just a Polish saying.

I'm not convinced that a kid can make that judgement. Certainly not before puberty. But that might just be my own unwavering feeling of comfort in my own sex talking.

If a doctor makes a judgement of it, then my opinion doesn't matter.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Puberty blockers aren't OTC, they're prescribed by doctors. The kid's not making the judgement so much as they're bringing up the medical issue to a professional.

I was diagnosed with depression at a fairly young age, just entering into my teens, but I only got in to see a psych to begin with because I was worried enough to self-advocate. Can't really imagine what it would be like if I was told that I was too young to understand depression and turned out on my metaphorical ass.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

If they want to be as unhappy as everyone else, they are welcome

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I support trans people's right to exist and to be able to live happy lives 🤘 ❤️ crazy how so many transphobes obsess over trans people. most of them haven't even met a trans person

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Any transphobe I've had the misfortune of talking to has met a trans person. Most of them don't notice. One of them repeatedly hit on me.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I always equate these things just to human rights and the fact that someone is trans doesn't automatically negate their right to live or be happier or prosperous. The fact that they're trans should have no effect on basic human rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] antbricks@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

the whole (he/him) in my email signature was a wild ride... like do I add it even though I'm CIS/hetero/boring? I see all the middle aged white women in my office doing it, and that means it's a few weeks from HR making a vague rule about it... I'm not conservative, but I don't want to be some fake virtue signaler, since I don't really know any trans people... but I don't want to give some kind of passive approval of intolerance by NOT adding it... will HR flag me if I do add it? or if I don't?

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is where I fall off with liberals. "Lose the Trans talking points, they are holding the DNC back."

How about first we try losing the DNC talking points. They've been in charge this whole time and I didn't see trans people allow fascism to wash over the states while they were at the head of the government.

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You arent going to win any elections catering to 1% of the total population and alienating a large part of it. I would say that is just common sense politics at this point.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Our current system is predicated upon catering to the wealthiest (0.)1% which keeps winning them elections. Abusers of power get to frame their own opposition, and so you have things like poor people being blamed for the excesses of the rich. So you have people start swearing off avocado toast they never bought in the first place instead of proper italian plumbing.

Trans-rights have never actually been an issue. Anti-trans people are the issue because they made their issue everyone elses.

Abusers deflect and redirect onto their targets so they never have to defend themselves. It isn't that trans people want to survive, it's that there's motherfuckers that don't want trans people to exist.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Protecting the rights of individuals is not catering to 1% of the total population. Its the bare minimum in a supposed civilized democracy. You can never, ever, compromise on protecting individuals that are causing no harm to others and just trying to navigate through the world.

Do we need to showcase the trans issue? No. We need politicians that are better at navigating the media environment and can effectively strategize against the GOP propaganda machine.

If you do that first, you wouldn't have an issue with trans people. For fuck sakes make an attempt at it even and if they are capable and what I say is wrong, fine, expel the trans people from the party. Except, accept you will never be a party of values only one of opposition, so be cautious of ever trying to claim morality after that point.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Lose the gun talking point.

Dems be Beto O'Rourke'ing every election

This is the moment that O'Rourke lost texas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMVhL6OOuR0

2nd amendment can serve an important purpose, kill traitors who are violating the constitution.

Unfortunately, dems managed to convince people left-of-center to disarm, while the far-right have become the majority of gun owners.

Thanks, Democrats. You did the job for the fascists.

Gun are great. End fascism where the idea begins 🧠 by using the 2A

[–] 1234@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

it is like watching interdimensional cable from Rick and Morty "in this reality it is normal to carry guns and the discussion is which side of the aisle has more"

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have been saying this for years, as someone who lives in Texas: If the Dems stopped talking about "taking away guns", then Progressive policies/candidates would win in landslide elections constantly.

I voted for Beto, donated to his campaign, had his yard sign, etc. But I knew that sound clip was going to haunt him forever.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am far from a one issue voter, but the louder you are against the working class being armed, the slimmer the chances of me voting for you.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary

  • Karl Marx

It's one of things we actually agree with rightoids about... Democrat strategy is stupid beyond belief; who are the anti-gun libs going to vote for, the Republicans?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I support the trans agenda, the gay agenda, the woke agenda, and the Hyena Agenda.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The trans agenda is not that simple. I support their right to exist. I am fully against the pipeline to trans that I've seen in schools. You are only allowed to encourage a confused teenager, if you push back at all you are fired.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

They don't need pushed, or influenced, or anything other than a safe space to be themselves, and find out what that means to them. People who are atypical already have plenty of pushback from everyday society, I don't think we need to worry about making someone trans when they're not.

I have two young male children, who both prefer playing with girls to playing with boys. When we casually mentioned that some boys have vaginas and some girls have penises, they separately decided that each of them is, in fact, a boy who like to play with girls. Because that's who they are, and I doubt we could convince them otherwise.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"non-trans" normal person here, and I think everyone who has a problem with trans / queer / whatever people is a fucking moron. I absolutely support the "trans agenda"

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Gentle FYI for you today, the term for non-trans is cis or cisgender. 💜

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›