Tiktok comment sections have discovered "dd to the idf" does not get filtered by the automod and it's showing up everywhere even on non political posts.
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Iranian officials hint at the possibility of enriching uranium up to 90%, also known as 'weapons-grade', stating that it may be used to power 'ships' and 'other things'
- Telegram
Yes. A new relation-SHIP with rival nuclear powers.
Fetterman is kinda right in that it’s a waste of time for anyone to be there. Democrats, if they really truly opposed this bill, would have been filibustering everything and jamming up the entire thing for months while this was cooking.
Them showing up at the last yard to feebly try and swat the ball out of hands of the GOP is very obviously farcical and cynical. They very clearly weren’t playing to win this whole time, so you can’t really blame a player on the team for giving up and going home early.
you never have to hand it to that ogre
at-will employment
Right-Wing Groups Are Fueling Separatist Movements in Canada - Telesur English
Article
Discontent with federal policies has sparked separatist sentiments in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. On Monday, Probe Research released a poll showing that 22% of Manitoba residents would vote in favor of separating from Canada if an independence referendum were held.
Conducted with interviews of 1,000 people and a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, the survey indicates that up to 70% would vote to remain in Canada. It also reveals that support for separation is strongest in rural areas and among conservative voters.
The results reflect a similar trend in Alberta and Saskatchewan. In these western Canadian provinces, separatist sentiment has grown in recent years, particularly among conservatives frustrated with federal government policies.
That frustration intensified after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party won the April 28 election, causing disappointment among conservatives who have been out of power since 2015.
Currently, Alberta — one of Canada’s wealthiest provinces and the source of 84% of the country’s oil production — is the epicenter of the separatist movement. A poll published in late May indicated that 30% of Alberta residents support independence, up four points from 2021.
In fact, Alberta now shows significantly stronger support for separatism than Quebec did when it held independence referendums in 1980 and 1995. This sentiment is growing amid accusations that the federal government is sacrificing Alberta’s prosperity in favor of Ontario and Quebec.
Alberta’s separatist movement plans to hold a referendum in 2026. In May, it unveiled the proposed question for the vote: “Do you agree that the province should become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada?”
The proposal gained momentum after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, a conservative, moved to lower the requirements for holding referendums and announced she would not oppose its organization. Ahead of the April 28 election, Smith voiced her opposition to a potential Liberal victory and has since justified the western provinces’ frustration following Carney’s win.
It'd be really funny if alberta seperated but had to give up the lower third of the province cause nobody is gonna drive through another country, to go to BC and back. So alberta becomes this tiny weird oil state in the middle of kanada lol
Still a large but vocal minority. Is the independence movement still going strong in Quebec or has that sentiment also died down over the years?
I think the independence movement died a bit down because of the 1995 referendum, which they lost by less than 2% iirc.
Trump-backed bill may slap 500% tariffs on nations trading with Russia including India, China
Trump tariff bill Russia India China: The bill, which the Republican Senator said now has 84 co-sponsors, aims to pressure countries like India and China to stop purchasing oil and other goods from Russia, thereby weakening its war economy and pushing Moscow to negotiate peace in Ukraine.
The Indian Express ^01/07/25^
Trade war India China Russia: US President Donald Trump has approved the introduction of a Senate bill that would impose a 500 per cent tariff on countries continuing to trade with Russia, including India and China, Senator Lindsey Graham said in an interview published Sunday.
“Big breakthrough here. So what does this bill do? If you’re buying products from Russia and you’re not helping Ukraine, then there’s a 500 percent tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70 percent of Putin’s oil. They keep his war machine going,” Graham told ABC News.
The bill, which Graham said now has 84 co-sponsors, aims to pressure countries like India and China to stop purchasing oil and other goods from Russia, thereby weakening its war economy and pushing Moscow to negotiate peace in Ukraine.
“My bill has 84 co-sponsors. It would allow the president to put tariffs on China, India, and other countries to stop them from supporting Vladimir Putin’s war machine and get him to the table. For the first time yesterday, the president told me … I was playing golf with him [Trump]. He says, ‘It’s time to move your bill,’” Graham added.
The bill, expected to be moved in August, is part of growing US efforts to tighten the economic noose around Russia as its war in Ukraine drags on. India and China have continued buying discounted Russian oil despite Western sanctions, making them targets of the proposed legislation.
The bill is co-sponsored by Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal. “We are going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox,” Graham said, adding that the president told him while golfing, “It’s time to move your bill.”
Initially proposed in March, the legislation was delayed after the White House signaled opposition to expanding sanctions, as Trump was trying to reset ties with Russian President. However, the administration now appears ready to support the effort.
Reports suggest the White House previously pressed Graham to soften the bill. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump Administration is “quietly pressuring” the Senate to water down the legislation by turning “the word ‘shall’ into ‘may’ wherever it appears in the bill’s text, removing the mandatory nature of the prescribed reprimands.”
The Journal’s report gained further weight when Graham proposed a carve-out in the bill for countries that support Ukraine—an attempt to prevent a potential US-EU trade war if the legislation is enacted. President Donald Trump, speaking to Politico in mid-June, also signaled hesitation, saying, “sanctions cost us a lot of money,” indicating a reluctance to pursue aggressive economic penalties. However, Secretary of State Marco Rubio later clarified that while such sanctions could disrupt the Ukrainian peace process, the administration has not ruled them out entirely.
If enacted, the legislation could mark a significant rupture in US trade relations with both Beijing and New Delhi. For India, which counts the US as a top export market, the measure could have wide-ranging economic and diplomatic consequences.
US getting desperate. You go from making peace with Russia and Iran so you can pivot to China. Realise you can't and pivot back to trying to peel off the weaker two first. Only this time you're giving an ultimatum to India, you know the country you've been trying to get to fight China for you..?? Simultaneously showing your hand that all negotiations are plots to buy time and position for attack to both your enemies and your allies. Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off!
Oh hey look, China and India are suddenly getting a lot of oil from Kazakhstan
I dunno how good this source is, but you get the idea
honestly how would america survive if there was suddenly an additional 500% exercise on goods from PRC?
honestly how would america survive if there was suddenly an additional 500% exercise on goods from PRC?
We saw what happens when the US levies extreme sanctions on China a few months ago: America buckles.
Yes make the BRICS stronger. No one needs Amerikkka anymore.
Like beating Iron it will either make BRICS stronger, or make it shatter. If China or India comply with the sanctions then it’s over for BRICS bloomers. There have been mixed reports on whether China is currently complying with the sanctions regimes against Russia already, with some major banks in China blocking Russian business. President Xi get your boys in line.
If China or India comply with the sanctions then it’s over for BRICS bloomers
Who can say about India, but China was pretty casually victorious in the last round. The US couldn't last two weeks against the halted flow of trade.
Trump’s global tariff is not a trade war, it is financial warfare.
Look at the trade balance between China and the EU:
I wrote this before:
As both export and import with the US have declined, China’s export to the EU has increased by 6.4% yoy and its import from the EU has decreased by 7.3% yoy!
That means Chinese exporters are channeling their goods to Europe, which will of course lead to a mercantilist fight where the European industries will now have to fight against cheap (and perhaps even superior) Chinese goods coming into their countries.
Meanwhile, China has reduced its import from the EU (likely because of the consumption slump and that China has been able to replace many products that once they could only obtain from the EU, like high end cars), and this will put pressure on the European exporters as they lose their income.
All of this is causing the EU to become even more desperate to secure a deal with Trump, since the European exporters are being squeezed to death by both the US tariffs and cheap imports from China. They will have to give Trump some really good deal, hoping to offset some of their losses. I suspect this is the true goal of the tariff war with China.
As expected, the EU is already folding: EU to Accept Trump Universal Tariff But Seeks Key Exemptions
The European Union is willing to accept a trade arrangement with the US that includes a 10% universal tariff on many of the bloc’s exports, but wants the US to commit to lower rates than that on key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors and commercial aircraft.
The EU is also pushing the US for quotas and exemptions to effectively lower Washington’s 25% tariff on automobiles and car parts as well as its 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, according to people familiar with the matter.
The European Commission, which handles trade matters for the EU, views this arrangement as slightly favoring the US but still something it could agree to, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
They have no choice but to get a deal from Trump. That’s the true goal of Trump’s tariffs against China - to leverage China’s massive industrial capacity to destroy the other export economies so they are forced to enter a deal with the US - the only country that freely runs a trade deficit to absorb their export goods.
This is also why I keep saying that China has to give up its net exporter status if it really wants to fight the US financial war.
I don't think this makes any strategic sense for the empire. Europe is functionally entirely subservient to the US already and the deindustrialization of Europe has been well underway for a long time. Why on earth would they want to boost China's economy in order to weaken their own vassal? Why would they want European imports to shift from the US to China? How does that strengthen the position of the empire? What does this "deal with the US" get the US that's better than what China's getting by America's self-induced trade isolation?
If this is the US's strategy, it's dumb as hell and will obviously weaken their global position in the long run. Sucks to be Europe, I guess.
My friend, mercantilism is like the oldest trick in economic warfare.
First of all, you need to understand that the only reason we have cheap goods today is because the world has a surplus of industrial capacity. If the world’s demand is larger than the supply of goods, then prices will rise globally, and Western countries would not enjoy cheap goods at all.
For the past 50 years, many developing countries have listened to the IMF (and under the coercion by World Bank and GATT/WTO) and oriented their economy into the infamous “export-led growth” model. Instead of investing in their own domestic wellbeing, they allocated significant share of the labor and resources into producing export goods. They were being told that to become a “high income country”, you have to “balance your budget” and be a fiscally responsible kid, and that means earning as much trade surplus as possible to cover up your budget deficit.
This allowed the US to enjoy the benefits simply by running a large trade deficit and turning itself into a major source of consumption to absorb the surplus exports from the rest of the world. The developing countries, on the other hand, rely on export revenues to invest domestically, and it is this constant source of consumption demand that keeps their factories running, their workers employed etc. Meanwhile, the developing countries compete with one another, by depressing wages, depreciating their own currency exchange rate etc. to maintain a competitive advantage in the export sector.
The end result is that we have an oversupply of cheap goods, where the excess is absorbed by the US running a permanent trade deficit.
Now that the US suddenly wants to impose global tariffs, and most of all, on China. What does that mean?
It will mean prices increasing in the US and American consumers purchase less goods. The share of global consumption suddenly shrinks, we now have an even more over-supply of goods against a shrinking share of consumers. Most importantly, it shuts Chinese exporters out of the American consumer market. As a result, China has to dump their cheap goods elsewhere or else their manufacturing sector will go into slump, and unemployment will rise. This is also a very bad timing for China because of the recent pandemic, and the property market imploding also means many people are less likely to spend as their savings dwindle, and the local governments facing a debt crisis since they could no longer leverage the rising land price to pay off the huge amount of debt taken out for infrastructure building.
So somebody else has to buy China’s huge surplus of goods originally intended for the Americans. Naturally, they dump the goods into Europe, which will kill off the European domestic industries because the Europeans simply cannot compete with the cheap and perhaps even superior Chinese goods, if they don’t also put up tariffs like the Americans. This is why the EU put up tariffs against Chinese EV last year as soon as Biden did so.
On the other hand, if they refuse Chinese goods, they will also run into problems with importing critical materials for their own industries. The rare earth export restriction was just such a reminder to them. But worse of all, reduced Chinese imports from the EU means a surplus of export goods that cannot be sold elsewhere, and the European factories will have to close down and layoff their workers, leading to a recession.
This is why EU has no choice but to fold, especially with their energy prices jacked up after the Nord Stream bombing.
And this is why Trump’s tariff is a financial warfare, where failing businesses prime them to be harvested by the American finance capital. If this situation is not resolved in some ways, we could be looking at mass IMF bailouts in the Global South at a scale not seen before.
There is no re-industrialization, despite what Trump says! The guy leading Trump’s “trade war” is Scott Bessent, who was responsible for the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. This is a finance guy doing finance thing. I’ve written about this in a previous comment on the very interesting history of Southeast Asia.
The only way out is for China to start importing from the Global South countries, and that means China has to start raising wages (by a lot) for its working class and give up its net exporter status.
My friend, mercantilism is like the oldest trick in economic warfare.
Yes, but for your merchants, not your greatest enemy's!
First of all, you need to understand that the only reason we have cheap goods today is because the world has a surplus of industrial capacity. If the world’s demand is larger than the supply of goods, then prices will rise globally, and Western countries would not enjoy cheap goods at all [excerpted to avoid wall of text] The end result is that we have an oversupply of cheap goods, where the excess is absorbed by the US running a permanent trade deficit.
Agreed on all counts, uncontroversial among Marxists (hopefully).
It will mean prices increasing and American consumers purchase less goods. The share of global consumption suddenly shrinks, we now have an even more over-supply of goods against a shrinking share of consumers. Most importantly, it shuts Chinese exporters out of the American consumer market. As a result, China has to dump their cheap goods elsewhere or else their manufacturing sector will go into slump, and unemployment will rise. This is also a very bad timing for China because of the recent pandemic, and the property market imploding also means many people are less likely to spend as their savings dwindle.
They seem to be pulling this off successfully without much issue given their increase in external trade and internal consumption (I know it's not as fast as you want but it is faster than basically anywhere else in the world).
So somebody else has to buy China’s huge surplus of goods. Naturally, they dump the goods into Europe, which will kill off the European domestic industries because they simply cannot compete with the cheap and perhaps even superior Chinese goods, if they don’t also put up tariffs like the Americans. This is why the EU put up tariffs against Chinese EV last year as soon as Biden did so.
On the other hand, if they refuse Chinese goods, they will also run into problems with importing critical materials for their own industries. The rare earth export restriction was just such a reminder to them. But worse of all, reduced Chinese imports from the EU means a surplus of export goods that cannot be sold elsewhere, and the European factories will have to close down and layoff their workers, leading to a recession.
This is why EU has no choice but to fold, especially with their energy prices jacked up after the Nord Stream bombing.
But in what way was the destruction of Europe help the health of the empire in the long run? Obviously American capitalists are all about it in the short term, but it weakens the overall position of the empire relative to China, which is far more significant geopolitically.
And this is why Trump’s tariff is a financial warfare, where failing businesses prime them to be harvested by the American finance capital. If this situation is not resolved in some ways, we could be looking at mass IMF bailouts in the Global South at a scale not seen before.
But China is establishing alternative financial systems to the IMF and World Bank. The PRC and BRICS bank are increasingly more important to the financial backing of the third world while the imperialist financial systems continue to lose their group. The intraimperial cannibalism of US capitalists consuming Europe's industrial capital will only further degrade the ability of the US to impose those conditions on the global south.
This is my whole point . Sure there's some upsides to some segments of the US financial class, but both the financial and industrial economy globally are shifting further and further away from US control, and all these efforts to tighten the grip only cause more countries to squeeze out and go to China/BRICS. This is not to say everything is resolved and imperialism is defeated. China has to settle the internal class conflict that's producing various economic crises within the country, but those pale in comparison to the financial crises that run through every single facet of American life because the power of the capitalist class is unchecked to an extent that even the most powerful and corrupt Chinese capitalists would struggle to conceive. BRICS has the fundamental flaw of India, who constantly straddles the imperialist and anti-imperialist worlds in pursuit of its own objectives, but more and more global industry, finance, and raw population continue to enter the BRICS sphere while the imperial sphere shrinks continuously. China remains incredibly cautious on the global stage, and I think we all agree that they can and should take more strident anti-imperialist action. But the BRI and other initiatives have very meaningfully decentered the imperial core in the economic world of the global south. And of course, until the empire is truly defeated, it will continue to wreak terrible havoc on whatever country it can prey on - but that list of countries keeps shrinking.
It is going to be a messy, bloody path to the collpase of imperialism. The trends could reverse and the US could find a way to reassert itself and force the rest of the world to buckle. But it seems like all it can really manage is to consume the working classes of the imperial core to its own long term detriment and commit unspeakable crimes in West Asia. Meanwhile, China slowly - too slowly, yes - is building the alternative economic order that is one of several necessary preconditions for the eventual victory of global socialism.
There is no re-industrialization, despite what Trump says!
Of course, I've said as much in this thread.
But in what way was the destruction of Europe help the health of the empire in the long run? Obviously American capitalists are all about it in the short term, but it weakens the overall position of the empire relative to China, which is far more significant geopolitically.
The EU has been the true challenger to American capitalism since its formation in the 1990s. When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, because its economy was never financialized, the American and European capitalists had been able to harvest their industrial assets and monetized them.
The amount of finance capital generated from monetizing Soviet industrial assets was so vast that it instantly allowed the US and the EU to “hyperleap” into fully neoliberalized economy, and the EU was born in 1993. The creation of euro would soon follow and officially adopted in 1999.
Since then, the euro has emerged as a challenger to dethrone the dollar. It is no coincidence that the Balkan conflicts started as soon as the EU was formed, to keep the EU to spend on militarization. It is also no coincidence that when Saddam wanted to sell his oil in euro, Iraq was immediately invaded in 2003. It is also unlikely to be a coincidence that as soon as Nord Stream was built, the Ukrainian fascist coup and civil war took place in late 2013. Finally, when Nord Stream 2 was completed, the current Russia-Ukraine war happened.
The goal of the US finance capital has always been to kill the euro. This is why the Russia-Ukraine war has to happen:
As you can see, Chinese yuan poses little to no threat to the US. In fact, China has repeatedly stated that they are not interested in anything other than the status quo, which is to preserve the dollar hegemony that has benefited its economy so much.
This is also why after the Ukraine war, when Putin was rallying other countries and calling to de-dollarize, China (and Xi) has been unusually quiet about it. Because why should they?
If the Ukraine war and the $300 billion confiscation of Russian foreign reserves cannot make China give up the dollar, then Trump’s trade war has even smaller chance of doing so.
The PRC and BRICS bank are increasingly more important to the financial backing of the third world while the imperialist financial systems continue to lose their group.
This changes nothing, because China has been very reluctant to internationalize the RMB to preserve its export advantage. It doesn’t want others to hold Chinese yuan as a savings currency, and they’re more than happy to let the dollar play that role.
What has been happening with BRICS are countries starting to adopt bilateral/multilateral currency trade to reduce exposure of their dollar reserves from being confiscated by the US. This is more of a protective measure than de-dollarization, which I have explained again and again, that it can only happen at the real production/trade level i.e. China importing goods and replacing the role of the US as a net importer.
In the same vein, when saving, these countries will still swap the foreign currencies into USD through the forex market.
I’ll give you an example: after the Ukraine war erupted, Russia who was cut off from the dollar began to sell large quantity of oil to India, and accumulated a vast amount of Indian rupees. However, Russia soon realized that it cannot use those rupees at all, because after accounting for importing goods from India, there is nothing else for it to do.
Russia cannot sell rupee to buy Chinese yuan so they can use them to purchase Chinese goods, because the Indian central bank would not allow it as it will fuck with their exchange rate. And the forex market isn’t interested in holding rupee and trading away their yuan, at least not at a price favorable to them. As a result, Russia was forced to hold all the rupees they cannot use while sending away valuable commodities e.g. oil to India, practically for free.
The problem for most countries is that nobody wants to accumulate their currencies. The US dollar does not care though. You are free to use the dollar to do whatever you want: buy Chinese yuan, Indian rupee, gold, crypto, anything that people are willing to sell in exchange for the US dollar. And this is why the dollar is the global reserve currency, not the yuan or the rupee.
The problem for Russia is that it has been shut out from accessing the dollar, but for other countries, they will still buy the USD. This is why the foreign holder of US treasuries has increased in spite of Trump’s debacle, simply that it has switched hands - the Chinese no longer hold as much treasuries, and the money ended up in the UK, Japan and the Cayman Islands end up buying those treasuries. Everything has to balance out.
Since then, the euro has emerged as a challenger to dethrone the dollar
Germany might thing so, but it was so dysfunctionally designed there was never a chance of that, inevitably and in short order killing demand for their own production. EU consumption levels will not remain while throwing 3.5% to the MIC black-hole (plus 1.5% for ?something?), funded through national budgets which must remove that amount from the economy in addition to the rest of the permanent austerity
I don't know what that implies for the US.
I SUPPORT THIS WHOLESALE 100000000 TARRIFF ON EVERYBODY PLEAAAASSEEEE WE;RE BEGGING DEAR DONALD
right from putler's playbook
Argentina: Peronist Candidates Win Big in Formosa and Rosario Elections - Telesur English
Article
Progressive politicians deal a severe blow to President Milei’s party. On Sunday, Peronist candidates won in local elections in the province of Formosa and the city of Rosario, pushing President Javier Milei’s Freedom Advances party into a distant third place.
The results of these provincial elections may be seen as a prelude to the upcoming national legislative elections in October, when Argentina’s far-right will attempt to counter a resurgent Peronist movement, currently undergoing a process of reorganization following former President Cristina Fernandez’s placement under house arrest.
In Santa Fe, voters chose mayors, city council members and local leaders in 365 municipalities. In that province, “United to Change Santa Fe” — a coalition led by Gov. Maximiliano Pullaro’s Radical Civic Union (UCR) — won in 17 of the 19 major cities.
Another surprise came in Rosario, one of the province’s largest cities, where Peronist candidate Juan Monteverde claimed victory with 30.6% of the vote, beating far-right contender Juan Aleart, who received 28.8%. This marks the first Peronist win in Rosario in more than 50 years.
“The only way to save this democracy we have is to participate more and generate projects that try to represent the majority, even knowing that we are different. Because there is a social majority in Rosario, Santa Fe, and Argentina that does not agree with what is happening.”
“Today, the people of Rosario defeated the president, the governor and the mayor,” Monteverde said. “They voted without fear, against the political machines, and they won because there is a social majority that is struggling and disagrees with what is happening. But it lacked a political force to represent it. In Rosario, that force has now emerged.”
Freedom Advances won in just 2 out of 365 districts, securing 34 city council seats. Despite the modest results, Karina Milei — the president’s sister and secretary of the presidency — celebrated the outcome with fanfare.
In Formosa, Peronist Gov. Gildo Insfran cemented his dominance with more than 67% of the vote. His next goal is to push for a constitutional reform that would allow him to run for re-election in 2027. The far-right Freedom Advances party garnered just 11% of the vote.
From her residence in Buenos Aires, Cristina Fernandez spoke with the two Peronist leaders to congratulate them on their victories. “A few minutes ago, I spoke with my comrade, Gov. Gildo Insfran, to congratulate him on the excellent results for Peronism in the election of constitutional convention delegates and provincial lawmakers,” she posted on social media.
Argentina is currently in the midst of a marathon of staggered provincial elections throughout 2025. On Oct. 26, Argentines will vote to renew half of the country’s legislature by electing 24 senators and 127 representatives.
So I kinda tuned out for a little over a week, what's going on with the Iran-Israel war? They just ceasefire currently?
Yep. You chose a good time to check out, it’s been pretty quiet for a few days now
Trump: Doubt we'll make a deal with Japan. Not thinking about extending tariff pause past July 9
July 9 is the big day, where the 90 day pause for the majority of tariffs ends. The China "pause" (current baseline tariff with China is still like 50% lol) lasts for about 30 more days, IIRC? My guess is we're looking at another case of TACO Trump. But it will be crazy if he goes through with it and ends the pause for real.
the "TACO Trump" shit is fake Dem cope
Trump is winning every time these tariffs come up for re-negotiation. He extracts more concessions each time, and merely postpones the tarriffs. It's become a cycle of him touring the world collecting tributes. The end state of doing this forever is continued US dominance of global markets until other countries finally wise up and start rejecting American demands in unity, as a bloc.
What concessions has he got at this point?
America still has extremely high tariffs in place, while no other nations have met the escalation and installed equal reciprocal tariffs. That itself is an advantage to the American economy. China was the only country that even tried really, and their response was much weaker than the American tariffs. The “deal” they reached was for China to impose no trade war measures against America while America maintained 50% baseline tariffs against China.
Oh look another one sided deal that benefits the USA, and all the other party gets in return is not being punished. It’s just like “sanctions relief” in negotiations, where one side gives up material concessions while the other simply stops imposing penalties and loses nothing.
Trade wars only hurt both countries if both countries escalate. If only one country escalates while all the others do nothing, that gives the escalating nation an advantage.
This is how America weaponized trade offensively, while every other country is constantly on the defensive - fighting to even maintain their status quo.
There's no reason for other countries to put a tariff on US goods when other countries are export economies. So no, I don't think that on itself is a win for the US.
Trade war doomers whenever this question comes up: