Tiktok comment sections have discovered "dd to the idf" does not get filtered by the automod and it's showing up everywhere even on non political posts.
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Iranian officials hint at the possibility of enriching uranium up to 90%, also known as 'weapons-grade', stating that it may be used to power 'ships' and 'other things'
- Telegram
STOP HINTING AND JUST DO IT OR DON'T
Yes. A new relation-SHIP with rival nuclear powers.
Fetterman is kinda right in that it’s a waste of time for anyone to be there. Democrats, if they really truly opposed this bill, would have been filibustering everything and jamming up the entire thing for months while this was cooking.
Them showing up at the last yard to feebly try and swat the ball out of hands of the GOP is very obviously farcical and cynical. They very clearly weren’t playing to win this whole time, so you can’t really blame a player on the team for giving up and going home early.
you never have to hand it to that ogre
at-will employment
Right-Wing Groups Are Fueling Separatist Movements in Canada - Telesur English
Article
Discontent with federal policies has sparked separatist sentiments in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. On Monday, Probe Research released a poll showing that 22% of Manitoba residents would vote in favor of separating from Canada if an independence referendum were held.
Conducted with interviews of 1,000 people and a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, the survey indicates that up to 70% would vote to remain in Canada. It also reveals that support for separation is strongest in rural areas and among conservative voters.
The results reflect a similar trend in Alberta and Saskatchewan. In these western Canadian provinces, separatist sentiment has grown in recent years, particularly among conservatives frustrated with federal government policies.
That frustration intensified after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party won the April 28 election, causing disappointment among conservatives who have been out of power since 2015.
Currently, Alberta — one of Canada’s wealthiest provinces and the source of 84% of the country’s oil production — is the epicenter of the separatist movement. A poll published in late May indicated that 30% of Alberta residents support independence, up four points from 2021.
In fact, Alberta now shows significantly stronger support for separatism than Quebec did when it held independence referendums in 1980 and 1995. This sentiment is growing amid accusations that the federal government is sacrificing Alberta’s prosperity in favor of Ontario and Quebec.
Alberta’s separatist movement plans to hold a referendum in 2026. In May, it unveiled the proposed question for the vote: “Do you agree that the province should become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada?”
The proposal gained momentum after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, a conservative, moved to lower the requirements for holding referendums and announced she would not oppose its organization. Ahead of the April 28 election, Smith voiced her opposition to a potential Liberal victory and has since justified the western provinces’ frustration following Carney’s win.
Still a large but vocal minority. Is the independence movement still going strong in Quebec or has that sentiment also died down over the years?
I think the independence movement died a bit down because of the 1995 referendum, which they lost by less than 2% iirc.
Trump-backed bill may slap 500% tariffs on nations trading with Russia including India, China
Trump tariff bill Russia India China: The bill, which the Republican Senator said now has 84 co-sponsors, aims to pressure countries like India and China to stop purchasing oil and other goods from Russia, thereby weakening its war economy and pushing Moscow to negotiate peace in Ukraine.
The Indian Express ^01/07/25^
Trade war India China Russia: US President Donald Trump has approved the introduction of a Senate bill that would impose a 500 per cent tariff on countries continuing to trade with Russia, including India and China, Senator Lindsey Graham said in an interview published Sunday.
“Big breakthrough here. So what does this bill do? If you’re buying products from Russia and you’re not helping Ukraine, then there’s a 500 percent tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70 percent of Putin’s oil. They keep his war machine going,” Graham told ABC News.
The bill, which Graham said now has 84 co-sponsors, aims to pressure countries like India and China to stop purchasing oil and other goods from Russia, thereby weakening its war economy and pushing Moscow to negotiate peace in Ukraine.
“My bill has 84 co-sponsors. It would allow the president to put tariffs on China, India, and other countries to stop them from supporting Vladimir Putin’s war machine and get him to the table. For the first time yesterday, the president told me … I was playing golf with him [Trump]. He says, ‘It’s time to move your bill,’” Graham added.
The bill, expected to be moved in August, is part of growing US efforts to tighten the economic noose around Russia as its war in Ukraine drags on. India and China have continued buying discounted Russian oil despite Western sanctions, making them targets of the proposed legislation.
The bill is co-sponsored by Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal. “We are going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox,” Graham said, adding that the president told him while golfing, “It’s time to move your bill.”
Initially proposed in March, the legislation was delayed after the White House signaled opposition to expanding sanctions, as Trump was trying to reset ties with Russian President. However, the administration now appears ready to support the effort.
Reports suggest the White House previously pressed Graham to soften the bill. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump Administration is “quietly pressuring” the Senate to water down the legislation by turning “the word ‘shall’ into ‘may’ wherever it appears in the bill’s text, removing the mandatory nature of the prescribed reprimands.”
The Journal’s report gained further weight when Graham proposed a carve-out in the bill for countries that support Ukraine—an attempt to prevent a potential US-EU trade war if the legislation is enacted. President Donald Trump, speaking to Politico in mid-June, also signaled hesitation, saying, “sanctions cost us a lot of money,” indicating a reluctance to pursue aggressive economic penalties. However, Secretary of State Marco Rubio later clarified that while such sanctions could disrupt the Ukrainian peace process, the administration has not ruled them out entirely.
If enacted, the legislation could mark a significant rupture in US trade relations with both Beijing and New Delhi. For India, which counts the US as a top export market, the measure could have wide-ranging economic and diplomatic consequences.
US getting desperate. You go from making peace with Russia and Iran so you can pivot to China. Realise you can't and pivot back to trying to peel off the weaker two first. Only this time you're giving an ultimatum to India, you know the country you've been trying to get to fight China for you..?? Simultaneously showing your hand that all negotiations are plots to buy time and position for attack to both your enemies and your allies. Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off!
Oh hey look, China and India are suddenly getting a lot of oil from Kazakhstan
I dunno how good this source is, but you get the idea
honestly how would america survive if there was suddenly an additional 500% exercise on goods from PRC?
honestly how would america survive if there was suddenly an additional 500% exercise on goods from PRC?
We saw what happens when the US levies extreme sanctions on China a few months ago: America buckles.
right from putler's playbook
I SUPPORT THIS WHOLESALE 100000000 TARRIFF ON EVERYBODY PLEAAAASSEEEE WE;RE BEGGING DEAR DONALD
Yes make the BRICS stronger. No one needs Amerikkka anymore.
Like beating Iron it will either make BRICS stronger, or make it shatter. If China or India comply with the sanctions then it’s over for BRICS bloomers. There have been mixed reports on whether China is currently complying with the sanctions regimes against Russia already, with some major banks in China blocking Russian business. President Xi get your boys in line.
If China or India comply with the sanctions then it’s over for BRICS bloomers
Who can say about India, but China was pretty casually victorious in the last round. The US couldn't last two weeks against the halted flow of trade.
Trump’s global tariff is not a trade war, it is financial warfare.
Look at the trade balance between China and the EU:
I wrote this before:
As both export and import with the US have declined, China’s export to the EU has increased by 6.4% yoy and its import from the EU has decreased by 7.3% yoy!
That means Chinese exporters are channeling their goods to Europe, which will of course lead to a mercantilist fight where the European industries will now have to fight against cheap (and perhaps even superior) Chinese goods coming into their countries.
Meanwhile, China has reduced its import from the EU (likely because of the consumption slump and that China has been able to replace many products that once they could only obtain from the EU, like high end cars), and this will put pressure on the European exporters as they lose their income.
All of this is causing the EU to become even more desperate to secure a deal with Trump, since the European exporters are being squeezed to death by both the US tariffs and cheap imports from China. They will have to give Trump some really good deal, hoping to offset some of their losses. I suspect this is the true goal of the tariff war with China.
As expected, the EU is already folding: EU to Accept Trump Universal Tariff But Seeks Key Exemptions
The European Union is willing to accept a trade arrangement with the US that includes a 10% universal tariff on many of the bloc’s exports, but wants the US to commit to lower rates than that on key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors and commercial aircraft.
The EU is also pushing the US for quotas and exemptions to effectively lower Washington’s 25% tariff on automobiles and car parts as well as its 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, according to people familiar with the matter.
The European Commission, which handles trade matters for the EU, views this arrangement as slightly favoring the US but still something it could agree to, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
They have no choice but to get a deal from Trump. That’s the true goal of Trump’s tariffs against China - to leverage China’s massive industrial capacity to destroy the other export economies so they are forced to enter a deal with the US - the only country that freely runs a trade deficit to absorb their export goods.
This is also why I keep saying that China has to give up its net exporter status if it really wants to fight the US financial war.
Victorious? China still has 50% tariffs applied to them and they received nothing in return. That’s a straight up loss
In what way is it a loss for the US to weaken its trade with the world's factory while China uses the opportunity to increase trade with the rest of the world and internal consumption? China is suffering no economic harm and further strengthening its central position in the world economy while US manufacturing and the dollar's position both decline. The existence of the tariffs if not a victory for the US is they do exactly the opposite of what they intend to and China gives nothing in return.
Chinese EV manufactures are consolidating into duopolies and seem to be following the market capture route that Amazon and Netflix did, underselling competition and seizing the market share. Especially in the EU but also every other market except the US. This is compounded by their independent infrastructure, production capabilities and capacity, as well as battery and charging technologies. The dialectic rule of sufficient quantity making a qualitative change is near.
If American tariffs don’t harm China, and in fact aid it, as you are arguing, why did China work vigorously towards lowering them from 200+% down to 50%? If it’s so great for them why bother? They obviously care and it obviously damages them or they wouldn’t be entertaining this game of chicken with Trump and would have just ignored him
You are not well informed about this. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/06/trumps-us-china-trade-tariffs-timeline/
Currently, the tariffs are 33% from China and 50% from the US. Pretty comparable.
If American tariffs don’t harm China, and in fact aid it, as you are arguing, why did China work vigorously towards lowering them from 200+% down to 50%? If it’s so great for them why bother? They obviously care and it obviously damages them or they wouldn’t be entertaining this game of chicken with Trump and would have just ignored him
Because there is a substantial qualitative difference between a total halt to trade, as happened when they were 150%+, versus costs easily absorbed by Chinese industry (mostly at the expense of American distributors) at 50%. And importantly, that halt to trade was far more damaging to the US than it was to China. China was able to confidently say "we will match you in halting trade until you buckle and come back to the table", which is exactly what happened and exactly what would happen again if the US does this silly 500% tariff move.
While that was going on, China increased and deepened trade relationships with essentially every single country on earth. But you're obsessed with what the tariff numbers are - you're using the Trump metric of success. Whoever has the bigger tariffs wins. But what we as materialists actually need to look at are what effects this has on the global flow of capital and commodities. While full Q2 numbers aren't available since it ended yesterday, April numbers - when the trade war was its very height and US-Chinese trade effectively halted - show that China's foreign trade overall increased: https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-economy-april-2025-resilient-exports-and-investment-defy-us-tariffs/exports-and-investment-defy-us-tariffs/
China initiated new positive negotiations and signed new trade deals with a slew of different countries during and since the tariff war: ASEAN, Japan and Korea, South America, and Europe. Vietnam joined BRICS!
The primary objective of the tariff war was to isolate China from the global market by making everyone choose between the world's two biggest economies. And in essentially every single instance, the world chose China. The US instead isolated itself, and because the dipshits running the empire don't understand materialism, they also backfired on both the secondary objective of strengthening the dollar's role as global reserve and the tertiary objective of strengthening US manufacturing .
If you look any more deeply than "US tariff number bigger", you'll see that tariff war backfired in exactly the way every single sensible Marxist predicted it would.
I think regardless of which side we take I think it is fairly safe to say the rare earth nuke was fairly underwhelming.
For such a last resort "superweapon" they surely wasted on a shit deal that at best, being extremely generous, just maintains the previous status quo for some short amount of time.
The question should be what other weapons are China capable never mind willing to use again that are capable of achieving the same effect?
China only used (one of?) their best weapons to just force the same death cult embrace to continue. Who cares about calling that a victory? I fear the US is realizing they can pressure not China but their partners and Chinese non-interventionalism is the best possible gift.
Personaly I need to see those Chinese J-10s actualy parked on some airbase in Iran "soon" before we even begin to see a clear and real change of Chinese FP forced by Israel`s aggression.
Argentina: Peronist Candidates Win Big in Formosa and Rosario Elections - Telesur English
Article
Progressive politicians deal a severe blow to President Milei’s party. On Sunday, Peronist candidates won in local elections in the province of Formosa and the city of Rosario, pushing President Javier Milei’s Freedom Advances party into a distant third place.
The results of these provincial elections may be seen as a prelude to the upcoming national legislative elections in October, when Argentina’s far-right will attempt to counter a resurgent Peronist movement, currently undergoing a process of reorganization following former President Cristina Fernandez’s placement under house arrest.
In Santa Fe, voters chose mayors, city council members and local leaders in 365 municipalities. In that province, “United to Change Santa Fe” — a coalition led by Gov. Maximiliano Pullaro’s Radical Civic Union (UCR) — won in 17 of the 19 major cities.
Another surprise came in Rosario, one of the province’s largest cities, where Peronist candidate Juan Monteverde claimed victory with 30.6% of the vote, beating far-right contender Juan Aleart, who received 28.8%. This marks the first Peronist win in Rosario in more than 50 years.
“The only way to save this democracy we have is to participate more and generate projects that try to represent the majority, even knowing that we are different. Because there is a social majority in Rosario, Santa Fe, and Argentina that does not agree with what is happening.”
“Today, the people of Rosario defeated the president, the governor and the mayor,” Monteverde said. “They voted without fear, against the political machines, and they won because there is a social majority that is struggling and disagrees with what is happening. But it lacked a political force to represent it. In Rosario, that force has now emerged.”
Freedom Advances won in just 2 out of 365 districts, securing 34 city council seats. Despite the modest results, Karina Milei — the president’s sister and secretary of the presidency — celebrated the outcome with fanfare.
In Formosa, Peronist Gov. Gildo Insfran cemented his dominance with more than 67% of the vote. His next goal is to push for a constitutional reform that would allow him to run for re-election in 2027. The far-right Freedom Advances party garnered just 11% of the vote.
From her residence in Buenos Aires, Cristina Fernandez spoke with the two Peronist leaders to congratulate them on their victories. “A few minutes ago, I spoke with my comrade, Gov. Gildo Insfran, to congratulate him on the excellent results for Peronism in the election of constitutional convention delegates and provincial lawmakers,” she posted on social media.
Argentina is currently in the midst of a marathon of staggered provincial elections throughout 2025. On Oct. 26, Argentines will vote to renew half of the country’s legislature by electing 24 senators and 127 representatives.
So I kinda tuned out for a little over a week, what's going on with the Iran-Israel war? They just ceasefire currently?
Yep. You chose a good time to check out, it’s been pretty quiet for a few days now
Trump: Doubt we'll make a deal with Japan. Not thinking about extending tariff pause past July 9
July 9 is the big day, where the 90 day pause for the majority of tariffs ends. The China "pause" (current baseline tariff with China is still like 50% lol) lasts for about 30 more days, IIRC? My guess is we're looking at another case of TACO Trump. But it will be crazy if he goes through with it and ends the pause for real.
the "TACO Trump" shit is fake Dem cope
Trump is winning every time these tariffs come up for re-negotiation. He extracts more concessions each time, and merely postpones the tarriffs. It's become a cycle of him touring the world collecting tributes. The end state of doing this forever is continued US dominance of global markets until other countries finally wise up and start rejecting American demands in unity, as a bloc.
What concessions has he got at this point?
America still has extremely high tariffs in place, while no other nations have met the escalation and installed equal reciprocal tariffs. That itself is an advantage to the American economy. China was the only country that even tried really, and their response was much weaker than the American tariffs. The “deal” they reached was for China to impose no trade war measures against America while America maintained 50% baseline tariffs against China.
Oh look another one sided deal that benefits the USA, and all the other party gets in return is not being punished. It’s just like “sanctions relief” in negotiations, where one side gives up material concessions while the other simply stops imposing penalties and loses nothing.
Trade wars only hurt both countries if both countries escalate. If only one country escalates while all the others do nothing, that gives the escalating nation an advantage.
This is how America weaponized trade offensively, while every other country is constantly on the defensive - fighting to even maintain their status quo.
Trade war doomers whenever this question comes up:
He didn't get many final concessions yet. Canada just gave in on something, but there is no signed final deal yet IIRC?
I mean that's just wrong what concessions has he gotten? Hell talking about the whole Japan-US trade deals the US had to very quickly walk back their demands of strengthening the Yen against the dollar because the Japanese literally came out and said
Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato mentioned in an interview, there were thinly veiled threats of using US Treasury holdings as leverage in trade talks.
Like as of right now the only thing the US is asking for globally is 'Please world make your currencies stronger, please world let us sell you our shitty crops and meat' which is a far cry from what they all asked for when they started out. Because the guys in charge are openly arguing with each other during a trade discussion with other nations.
This is compounded by the fact that the US government did stupid shit like 90 DEALS IN 90 DAYS, they got exactly one from the most servile country the UK, when trade discussions take at least a year, especially when they have to make deals with the entire world, like the earliest reasonable timewindow the US gov could actually get is by september because that's how long a serious country needs to agree on new trade policies.