this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

55741 readers
917 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What Distros do you want to shoutout and why you think they are doing well/are the best at what they do?

I am curious what is out there and have only had some experience with Linux Mint, SteamOS, and Pop!_OS

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Garuda absolutely nails it with their helper app that sets you up with a choice of popular software, handles updates, and gives you easy access to common settings.

It makes it very approachable for people new to Linux.

[–] edel@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

We don't know and, let us be frank, due to the nature of the community, it is impossible to know... Distros could report the downloads but if it became a KPI, it will be abused right away.

Fedora is well funded and probably the best overall. Now, its ties to US and IBM/Red Hat will keep it constrain in growth.

OpenSUSE is a second contender in funding and best overall, but German branding has taken a deep these last years... I know the government actions should be separate but, in reality, is that SUSE as a company will be constrained in growth too, therefore OpenSUSE. Its community need to be more global too.

Debian is king still. Much of development depends on the previous 2. However, in spite of huge progress lately, still not the best for new Linux users. That is why Linux Mint, Ubuntus, TuxedoOS still exist, but their growth won't be much as Debian gets better and better, but always a step behind the corporate funded ones.

The Chinese Linux offerings are becoming well funded are very interesting... but there is a bridge to cross that most of the World still not ready to do... partly is well funded, partly is racism.

Finally we have Arch. I see it better future than Debian TBH, but we are talking 5 to 10 years down the line. It won't be Arch though, it will be some new variant like CachyOS that brings it to the public... maybe KDE's new bet?!

[–] relic4322@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Ton of comments, and I havent read them all, but I wanted to ask if you really meant popular or if you wanted something for a specific reason. Easy for new ppl to linux, good for desktops, etc etc.

I dont really use GUIs on linux, except for when I want to have a fancy pants riced network monitor type situation. I am a big fan of NixOS except for python Dev stuff. Big fan of being able to clone a machine or recover a machine with a single conf file.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not an expert but ...

  • I think Fedora and OpenSUSE are the best (with Fedora leading). Well-funded and they take security seriously.
  • Arch and Bazzite are filling specific niches.
  • ReactOS and NixOS I think are in beta, but I'm not paying much attention to either.
  • In terms of desktop environments I think KDE Plasma leads the pack. MATE is strong on accessibility though.
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 hours ago

In my opinion I love CachyOS.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

I do like Mint very much, but I think that they are neglecting to update their apps. A lot of apps are not up to date, and that's just sad...

[–] oliver@lemmy.1984.network 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Love Fedora with KDE, my new daily driver. Tested Endeavour, Manjaro and also Mint and openSuSE but finally went with Fedora. Debian (on the other side) is my preferred base for servers and services.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

NixOS by far has the most momentum right now.

Just check the non-unique package counts:

https://repology.org/repositories/statistics/nonunique

More than 80K packages that exist in other distros, more than all of packages in AUR combined with 90%+ being the newest version in unstable

And you can run unstable without an issue since you can downgrade individual packages whenever

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Popular equals more money and more interest. In other words popularity and quality feed into each-other (not 1:1, but more than 1:0).

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 41 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about the best but Debian has been going strong for 32 years and the backbone of many distros. Its MVP in my book.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Fedora has gotten much more stable and reliable in the past decade. 15+ years ago it was generally regarded as nice but unstable. I'd say nowadays for a moderately technical user it offers a better experience overall than Ubuntu or Mint. There are still unfortunately some pitfalls for new users (media codecs come to mind). In fact, the only issues i've had in most of those 10 years have been related to GNOME plugins or the Plasma 6 transition, problems that also occured on Ubuntu.

I have 2 computers: one running Ubuntu, one Fedora. This has been my setup for over a decade. I have lately been finding Ubuntu more and more cumbersome to use, with less of the "just works" experience i remember having in the past. Perhaps the focus on cloud computing has caused the desktop to languish a bit.

I would like to try Pop!_OS, but i haven't had a free evening for a while to do a backup and reinstall on one of my computers. It's also been a while since i used Mint, so my impression could be out of date.

The nice thing about Linux overall (compared to macOS and Windows) is that each update generally improves on the experience. On commercial platforms the experience gets worse as often as it gets better, usually both at the same time. GNOME and Plasma are both overall much better than they were a decade ago (despite a few regressions) while macOS and Windows are both worse in general.

[–] CairhienBookworm@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

I started my Linux journey with Ubuntu, then switched to Linux Mint for a while and dabbled with Manjaro for a hot minute, and ultimately found my home on Fedora Workstation for the past several years. Once set up with rpmfusion and 3rd party codecs it's a very solid and reliable distribution. The new atomic projects (and derivatives) look very interesting too.

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

The Arch derivatives, CachyOS and EndeavourOS. They’ve really done a good job with Arch and cultivating their own communities. It’s paid off for them and Arch isn’t really seen as just a hobby distro like 15 years ago, or a meme like the last 5 years.

Bazzite, for both general desktop use or dedicated for gaming. Just strength to strength from the project. I hope Fedora’s proposal to remove 32-bit libs doesn’t hurt them. By far the best, just untouchable, atomic distro.

Linux Mint for the first time in about 10 years is being seriously recommended to new users and not laughed off as a Linux Windows clone. That team has never stopped putting in the effort and deserve it. I don’t know how they’re going with/plans for Wayland, but I hope smoothly.

Fedora. I’ve never used it personally. But since starting with Linux in 2006 I’ve only ever seen or heard of it as kind of “being there” but not really talked about much. People are talking about it now as being a reliable and solid choice for new users and intermediate users.

Debian. I do see Debian mentioned now a lot more than it has been in years. I think people generally are becoming more satisfied with the idea of a stable OS, ages not writing it off as being left behind, constantly out of date, can’t run latest AMD graphics, etc. In my mind, flatpak helps that a lot, since you don’t need to wait years to get the latest versions of programs, but I don’t know for sure that is helping this current wave of success.

On the other hand:

Tumbleweed seems to be stagnating. They’ve made some changes and moving away from yast for the first in forever. The switch to selinux has affected proton usage in a way that it’s not super “new user friendly”. Even amongst people wanting to try out Opensuse, you often see “I’ll give Slowroll a try.”

PopOs’ cosmic desktop is still in early stages, and you do hear good things, but popos seems even less talked about now. They might have hit their peak 3-5 years ago, or maybe it will come around again for them like some of the distros above.

Nobara was massively talked up a few years back. But not so much now. And you do see discussions like “Nobara had too many problems on this machine, I just went straight-up Fedora”.

The other main hobby/enthusiast distros that were getting discussed more in the last few years - NixOS, Void Linux, Alpine. Not so much anymore. NixOS definitely did take off a lot more than the others, but it still just doesn’t come up as often as a couple years ago.

[–] disco@lemdro.id 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cosmic desktop shines on an arch distro

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

Especially if you're using the Chaotic-AUR to get the latest updates ASAP without recompiling (like with the COPR repo on Fedora)

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Good summary. 👍

Debian. I do see Debian mentioned now a lot more than it has been in years.

I haven't noticed much difference, Debian has always been the go to distro if you wanted reliability and repositories that cover almost everything. Debian has always been an excellent choice for productivity. It's not by accident that Debian for more than 20 years has been the distro with by far the most derivatives.

By that standard Arch is the only distro that has achieved something similar, and it may be somewhat telling that SteamOS switched from Debian based to Arch based. Arch is way smaller in scope, and more nimble and easier to maintain. But AFAIK they do not have the democratic process Debian has, so I'm not sure it can really be called community based distro like Debian. Arch has more of a top leadership.
Debian is probably the most true to the Free and Open Source ideals among the big distros.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 50 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

While Void isn't exactly under rated ( it is very highly rated on distro watch for one ), for someone looking for a systemd free distro or a light weight one in general, it is a decent choice. The repos aren't as broad based as Arch but they do have newer versions of the software that they host.

I could be wrong, but aren't Linux Mint and Pop OS ultimately based on Debian? (Mint is based on Ubuntu which in return has a Debian base). Debian was my main entry way to the Linux world and there is a reason why so many distros are built on it. Very old as well (not as old as Slack ware but Slack ware isn't exactly noob friendly).

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Mint is the best apparently

https://distrowatch.com/

I use Arch btw

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Distrowatch does their rankings by page hits, it's not the best indicator of either usage or popularity.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago

Wait, MX has finally been supplanted by superior options? Unbelievable!

(Still feels like an outlier when you consider actual popularity of distros)

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Obviously. I use Mint, by the way.

[–] giacomo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

probably a three way tie between fedora, ubuntu, and arch.

[–] Thrickles@lemmy.zip 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Bazzite has been working so well that even the wife has converted over. It cured my distro hopping so I haven't played much attention to how other distros have been doing.

[–] VitabytesDev 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

A question - can I use Bazzite for uses other than gaming? I game on my laptop, but most of the time I'm writing code. Could I use it for that or should I go for something like Fedora, Debian or Arch?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

You absolutely can. There's a small learning curve for using immutable distros, but once you get a handle on it, it works great.

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (15 children)

Fedora Silverblue -- a very good balance of immutable distro and user friendliness. Stability and reliability of being immutable without low-level hacking like in Nix / Guix.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›