this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
623 points (88.2% liked)

Selfhosted

48727 readers
1070 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sooooo... he's NOT leaving YouTube?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (28 children)

I was actually kinda wondering the other day why super large content creators with good cash flow from what they already do, don't ditch Google and Patreon or anything else that takes a cut to be nothing more than a middleman to accessing the content? They don't need to host on the same level as YouTube; they could probably make more money hosting their videos on their own website, where they can control what is free or paid for, and can work directly with advertisers themselves.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They have. Nebula is biggest im aware of, floatplane is another.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sauce plus and dropout as well. Basically run by youtubers to make content without relying on YouTube. A lot of this is running on pre-existing tech for running a streaming service and I assume it's dependent on AWS (Amazon) hosting but yeah lots of smaller paid streaming services run by youtubers because YouTube sucks. I believe sauce plus is essentially the same as Floatplane on the backend, they mentioned working with LTT to make it.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

hosting their videos on their own website

I love that entrepreneurial attitude. If an online service is unsatisfactory, just develop your own software from the ground up and provision the infrastructure from your pocket. Car industry sucks? Just build your own car! GPU prices high? Grab a soldering iron and a handful of sand, how hard could it be?

Things are always more complex than they appear. The whole point of services like Youtube and Patreon is to offload that complexity onto the provider in exchange for a fee (or some other form of compensation) from the user. Just look at how many early Lemmy instances have gone offline because of the overwhelming financial or administrative burden. Hate the companies all you like, and by all means look for independent solutions, but don't pretend they offer no value whatsoever.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] ddawg@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Love this, although I think he will realise pretty quickly that hosting on his >!Steam deck!< might have some drawback haha (I'm thinking storage here)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cartman brah

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's very cool indeed – although I dread the moment he starts talking to his followers about Lemmy.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It would be a larger influx of bullshit than even Reddit was able to pull off.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›