For anybody wondering if Zohran is hiding his power levels
Yes. I have so much to say about him and this campaign and I’m thinking I’ll do that write up this weekend or early next week
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
For anybody wondering if Zohran is hiding his power levels
Yes. I have so much to say about him and this campaign and I’m thinking I’ll do that write up this weekend or early next week
I mean, I assume there are plenty of elected politicians that are personally in their hearts further left than their platform, the question is what they want to push for while in office, obviously he won't be pushing for workers owning the means of production, or maybe anything, but there may be positive things he wants to do that build power and confidence for workers to one day push for those things more vocally, rather than depending on a guy with power who, at one time when he didn't have power, publicly believed those things.
lol I imagine if he is indeed hiding his power levels it’s not like you can just say that on this little website, I get it. So I will take this your admission that he is without actually saying it ;)
Obama 2.0 dropped
629 days of livestreamed extermination and this is who I am supposed to be celebrating?
US cultural hegemony and liberal zionism are scourges.
“Obama 2.0” this must be a joke?
The video you shared is a short form answer for an extremely liberal audience to win an election. He already has clarified his public stance on Israel as having the right to exist only as a state with equal rights for all. To any leftist hearing that, you should immediately know he is saying Israel as we know it CANNOT exist. He is very obviously not a Zionist if you look at all at his history of organizing.
Touting the endorsement of an extremely popular politician in your home city to win an election is not the dig you think it is. Why on earth would he denounce her endorsement if he’s actually interested in winning?
Increasing funding for hate crime prevention does NOT just include for antisemitism. Also we should want increased funding for prevention of antisemitism and all hate crimes. Am I missing something here?
You’re pointing out a singular deleted tweet of his, being highlighted by a right wing grifter Twitter account, when he still has things like this up on his Twitter.
And what is he supposed to do? Endorse vandalism?
Please be serious. This is an embarrassingly poorly read post. I swear to god some people ostensibly on the left think it’s more important to do nothing wrong than it is to actually do something right and make some progress.
"Increased funding for hate crime prevention" means increased policing, because currently in the US the only "prevention" for hate crime is policing. Any increase to policing, and any moves to put the "safety" of marginalized people into the hands of the police, is violence.
Edit: I recommend Dean Spade's Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, & The Limits of the Law for a really good analysis of the way that "hate crime" laws and hate crime policing are dangerous ways to deflect from real justice, and also serve to increase the amount of violence that marginalized people face.
He wants to hire social workers and expand the social safety net, not increase police funding. Please at least attempt to familiarize yourself with the material you are discussing before making sweeping statements about it
What a goon, social workers are cops too, but sure quote Mao when someone disagrees with you because disagreement can only arise if someone doesn't investigate. Obviously you're the only person who knows anything and you're always right, so until we reach your conclusions we must just not have studied hard enough
Obama 2.0 dropped
Let's see what he materially does when he's in office. Too early to tell.
629 days of livestreamed extermination and this is who I am supposed to be celebrating?
If you are US American or Canadian: yes. If you aren't either of those: let it rip.
Past revolutionaries did much dirtier things to gain and retain power than Zohran refusing to tank his campaign by quieting his tone in order to win an election and actually have the power to positively effect his community. His approach to the genocide has impressed me more than the PRC's has, as one example (given the respective context of each entity).
US cultural hegemony and liberal zionism are scourges.
Agree, it sucks that he has to walk back the public presentation of some of his principles in order to win. That's politics, it's fucking dirty even when you're the "good guy". It is even true of non-electoral politics to some extent. You do what you need to do to gain power, and once you can wield it effectively with the support of those you represent, you have more freedom to actually be a leader.
Nothing wrong with being outraged about the ongoing genocide, ofc. Zohran is hopefully the first of many, and he has proven that support for Palestine (which he does, even if his public presentation of that has been modified for purposes of winning a campaign) does not permanently tank you forever in your political career. This is good, Zionism in the U.S. still holds strong, but is quickly eroding. At this point, the more they ask him about it, the faster it erodes; we have the upper hand and that should be celebrated.
Would love an explanation as to why you believe he should say he won't fight antisemtism.
Leaving a comment here. I want to come back to this post in a few months-years.
Comrades, we are materialistic. There is more chances that this guy bends the knee to the hegemonic power than really pushing socialist laws (more close to the SPD than Bolchevisk use of the capitalist state power).
We also know how the USA operates when we talk of progressive politicians (not even socialist ones).
I wish him and his supporter the best. But, comrades, be materialistic, don't be idealistic.
The dialectical relationship between your post and the post immediately before it by a few minutes is really giving peak hexbear
I’m surprised we’re doing this dance again, I thought we were free after Bernie and AOC show their true colors
The Third-Worldists feeling justified as we Amerikkkans once again argue over electoralism.
Prominent donors are gunning to get Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa a job in the Trump Administration in hopes of pushing him out of New York City’s mayoral race, sources told me. The aim is to open up the GOP nomination — and the nearly 30% of the vote someone running in that lane is expected to get — for current mayor Eric Adams.
No amount of money in the world can get Eric "Mr. Türkiye" Adams to win the mayoral race running as a Republican in New York City. They could blow billions of dollars like Bloomberg during his 2020 run and maybe Adams would get 30%. His approval rating right now is 20%. Almost 60% of New Yorkers not only disapprove, 60% of New Yorkers think he should resign from office right now. No amount of money can make that ghoul win.
Guess the goal from the establishment uniparty is to try split the vote so an establishment democrat running as an independent can win, because there's no way Adams is winning lol. Independent, Democrat, or Republican, Adams is truly in the gutter no matter what.
They would probably have more success in running Giuliani again.