Is "metux" a distro, or a bad pun on "Me Too?"
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
50 points (86.8% liked)
Linux
8169 readers
205 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What?
Sorry, one of the hyperlinks in the article ("pretending to be oblivious") linked to a toot that was preceded by this toot which says:
I am sorry but the last paragraph about accessibility is complete and utter bullshit. Jesus fucking Christ.
I don't know what's worse, giving the metux more attention or not having a clue what you write about.
There isn't any " remarkable levels of anti-X11 sentiment from Wayland proponents since the announcement" either. Your perception of reality is so wrapped its basically an Ouroboros by now.
Emphasis mine
metux is Enrico Weigelt, the dev behind Xlibre, the new fork of X11. He's quite controversial, partly due to claiming to want to keep politics out of development by filling his posts with alt-right dog whistles, as well as being an antivaxer and having some... er... revisionist views of history.
Ah, so worse. Cool.
In my experience, devs who want to "keep politics out of it," typically don't want their politics challenged.
I read the whole article and I'm still kinda confused what the "we" in the title is referring to.
Also and addition to the 'non disabled people pushing for accomodations even when it isn't needed then not listening to the disabled people' conversation, /s should only be used when the sarcasm isn't obvious.
The entire r/fuckthes sub is autistic people saying how it ruins jokes then non autistic people saying "nO iTs FoR pEoPlE wItH aUtIsM" and saying the sub is ableist and its so annoying how they won't listen to the very people they're claiming to fight for.
Not to say I think /s is useless, it definitely has a place when sarcasm is iffy, a good example is making fun of conservatives where people might think you're serious.
Also the /hj (half joking) one is SO infuriating because there's 2 halves and one of them is a joke but it doesn't say which one. It's never really been an issue for me personally, but it's a bad system that gets on my nerves.
I'm not sure if I'm putting my thoughts into words well enough to get my point across without sounding like an asshole.
idk I just have some controversial opinions on tone indicators that's minorly annoying to me and thought this would be a good place to share.
For me personally I cannot externally observe how obvious my sarcasm is, so I always use it just in case. Plus on many platforms you can spoiler the /s anyways.
the earth is flat
/s
That's not what I thought /hj meant.
I've always considered it to be such that the whole thing is simultaneously a joke and true (haha jk, unless?), or maybe just hyperbole. But I've avoided using it myself because clearly it gets misinterpreted way too frequently