this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
788 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71585 readers
3554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago

Very good news!!

[–] Ekeagle@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Why aren't you using another platform?

[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Because I don't watch random videos, I watch people I'm subscribed to and they don't exist on other platforms. I would love to switch, really. The very fact I'm on Lemmy tells you that I'm open to doing that kind of thing.

[–] dyc3@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Because YouTube is where shit happens dude. Yeah sure theres peertube and others, but frankly, nobody that people care about are uploading to them. Not to mention they don't offer the monetization opportunities for creators that YouTube does.

Ad block and sponsor block and call it a day.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm finding I'm using youtube less and less that I can't actually remember the last time I used it for anything. Youtube has so much crap now.

Because of their monetisation scheme for content creators, it was profitable for creators to drag 15 mins of information out to one hour, and then to include shock faces as thumbs to get more clicks, and then to get more viewers just to watch a bit of the video as viewership dwindles into just mindlessly watching suggestions.

I feel sorry for those creators who have gone balls deep with youtube content and who have no "plan b".

[–] benjaminb@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t know if I’m crazy or of YouTube is genuinely slow for me (with adblocker)

Turns out I was not crazy

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I mean, you can never really rule it out..

[–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

Daniel Suelo for CEO of YouTube!

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yo I pay for premium and it’s been fucking slow. Cancel my subscription? Guess I might need to.

[–] scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I had to turn off privacy badger and ublock for it to not be slow. It's stupid I'm paying for the service to be ad free it should be ad free without complaints.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Your premium tier has been upgraded to the basic plan with ads at no extra charge for you yet, Dear Customer! Aren't you happy?

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 11 hours ago

So it's wait a few seconds and watch a black screen or watch a minute of ads? What a choice...

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 53 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A wild YouTube appeared!

Go, uBlock Origin!

Wild YouTube used Throttle!

It's not very effective...

uBlock Origin used Evolve!

It's super effective!

YouTube fainted!

[–] JohneryCreatives@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

This made me laugh. I wonder which one will prevail in the end

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 42 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I watched videos on Newgrounds using dial-up

They are going to have to slow ad blockers by a lot for me to consider it slow

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

My wife and I were discussing this. This isnt "slow" to us, its just a tiny bit inconvenient. We were used to the old AOL pictures taking a good minute or two to load.

We would get rid of Youtube before we get ads.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Ahh seeing images load line-by-line and you get excited as you can actually start to tell what the image is!

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Can confirm.

[–] hefejefe@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

And his stupid CEO specifically. I've yet to hear him pitch a good idea.

load more comments
view more: next ›