this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
592 points (98.5% liked)

/0

1984 readers
96 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (11 children)

I think this is a nice gesture but I also think it's way too charitable for the Anti-GenAI people currently complaining. Their issue isn't that they want to avoid it, they want to stamp it out, they want it gone. They're not going to hide posts or keywords, they're going to brigade them. They already brigade and harass explicitly GenAI communities and don't block them. They've harassed me multiple times, told me to die in DMs and even impersonated me for running such communities. Tagging isn't going to help, they're just going to use it to hunt down people who post it and brigade the posts or target the users, because they aren't angry that they are seeing it, they're angry that it exists and they wish to stamp it out, no matter the cost.

In short this is a good solution with good intentions but it assumes a level of good faith that just isn't there. I'd agree with this if the problem was really people just not wanting to see it, but the problem is much deeper. I'm sure that once people start doing it, the goal posts will be moved and they'll just stop using "untagged" as a reason for complaining.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 days ago

This is what they are gonna call cyborgs born in the year 2100

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's a good idea in spirit but the tags will mostly be used to brigade and not to filter in my opinion. Most apps dont even have the feature if I'm not mistaken.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

I already raised that concern as well, but I do think it's worth a try. Would be great to dupe the functionality of the NSFW tag for this purpose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

People should do this for stuff they generated with llms too. Realistically English needs evidentials, like tenses that explain the source.

Much unintentional disinformation would be cleared up if people stated the source. E.g. "I remember learning..." "Someone I trust told me..." "I heard an expert say..." "a statistical text generator emitted..." "a random internet comment said..."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[–] leMe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Great! proper tagging and content description helps everyone 👏

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 days ago
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What about that mod banning people from ai communities before they could block the community?

[–] hendu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If they don't want to see the AI communities anyway, is that really a problem?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Then people who hate ai should be grateful, because they don't want anything to do with that community anyway. :)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

I don't really see the issue with that, its just a mod doing that, no admins.

I don't think anyone annoyed about being banned from there wanted to engage with the community properly anyway.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That wasn't very Anarchy of you. /joke

[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok, so should we tag this post or did y'all draw that pic?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it would be good if users could somehow add the tag to a post if the owner forgets to. Tildes.net has this. Although I get that it would need ti be added inti Lemmy.

[–] sgnl@midwest.social 5 points 5 days ago

You can edit titles in Lemmy. So they can add it afterwards.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›