this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
220 points (99.5% liked)

Neat - For neat stuff you found

860 readers
263 users here now

For stuff that's neat. Neat article? Neat video? Neat pic of a bug you saw? All good. Neat meme? Ehhh... take it to the meme subs.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PillBugTheGreat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Hard part with these communities is that many were drivers of systemic racism. The charters would oftentimes include rules about who was allowed to move in.

Don't believe me? Look at the current population mix of any of those planned communities. That should be a rough approximation of the races that were allowed to participate.

These communities provided a leg up for anyone that was allowed in. They received a good subsidized community. It did not, and was not meant to, create an equal playing field for everyone.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They would (considering a reasonable government) if the problem was not enough houses. Right now there are enough houses, it's just not affordable. So a reasonable government's actions on this situation would have been to heavily tax people/corporations with high number of houses.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Or build more and sell at cost to first time buyers not corporations

[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 37 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

My country is sort of doing that. They're subsidising new builds to large development companies ... who will then sell them off at fucking ridiculous prices that nobody can conceivably afford.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yup theres a couple new neighborhoods goin up down the street from me, houses start at 400k and they are smaller than the 200k house we own. Idk who they think will be able to afford that.

Blackrock i guess.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

In the US they're firing all of the federal workers, which along with our military, is one of the largest social services in the country.

[–] SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They need to start making fucking rent to own a thing again. This shit is getting absurd and they won't like it when we overthrow the landlords for this fuckery.

[–] Asafum 10 points 19 hours ago

I hate myself so much for turning this down... The house I was renting was owned by a really nice guy who lived down the road and couldn't sell it for the 280k he wanted, it was off a main road and directly behind a gas station so I really didn't want to settle there, but for $280k I really wish I could have seen into the future... That was 2 years before covid. A year into covid and all the WFH people moving out to the area the house went to $500k... Now I don't even want to look at what it might be.

All that said I live in a garage now because the fucking prices are absolutely insane.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

But muh freedumb

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The government does help build housing. My apartment complex got over 2 million in PPP loans forgiven, and they built a new complex next to mine while constantly raising my rent, doing construction with backup alarms going off nonstop & shutting down my ability to leave, etc. Best part is I live in a blue state, and the cify made sure they let me know they don't care cause they claimed it meant it would bring more taxpayers to the community.

We keep acting like we'll find other solutions & eat the rich is only a metaphor, but it is the only solution.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Did they actually build a large enough amount to make a difference, or was it just symbolic?

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read the article? 30,000 families, 170,000 people.