In other words, our good democratic ally in the Middle East is doing good things.
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
320 points (98.5% liked)
Privacy
38498 readers
412 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Say the line Bart!
sigh, "Unlike insert socialist country here, the West has freedom of speech and the right to express your opinions without the secret police coming after you."
YAYYYYYYY!
Fuck all those spying countries. But yea still I believe in the west you get in trouble for acting, not just speaking
Being deported sucks, but it’s nowhere as bad as going to prison heh, but there sure is an increase of those shitty repressions all over the world currently
This is a cool way to protect a belief, narrowing the scope so that the refuting data do not apply anymore. Perhaps I can write a fucking essay about it, but do you have data to support this narrowing move? There is like a ton of data that the West has been invasively spying of possible threats to the status quo (from Cointelpro to undercover UK cops like recently), not just people "acting on it". Furthermore, actions can fall under protected free speech as well, like putting up a poster, demonstrating, and protesting. So your proposal is inherently undemocratic if you roll back freedom to only protect oral expression, quite similar to a "Don't ask don't tell" attitude towards gay people. What you just said is simply counter-factual. Blanket surveillance is a staple of Western societies in the 21st century, and it blows my mind that there are still people oblivious to what is more or less spelled out clearly in the Patriot Act and all laws modeled after it across the globe.
well said, i wish eurolibs would get this through their head, but i'm wishing for too much
Sure, any censorship, spying and oppression is bad. I’m just saying one goes harder than the other, but I’m not denying that it sucks and that it clearly exists. I’m well aware of the patriot act and that speaking can endanger you. I just have this feeling like you get persecuted for speaking against the government in countries like China, whereas you need to be a strong figure to have the same fate in other countries. Anyways, it sucks for all countries that have this.
I have no data and this is just a feeling.
Democracy and freedom of speech, freedom to protest, freedom in general is in danger
I just have this feeling like you get persecuted for speaking against the government in countries like China
Tell that to the students that were expelled from their universities and had their degrees revoked or the public employees that were for fired for speaking out against the American government's support for the Gazan genocide.
Not to mention the civil servants that were fired/fined for advocating for LGBTQ rights in the decades past.
USA sucks as well. As far as I’m concerned, it is not a democratic country that supports freedom of speech and I’ll never go there.
USA is a bit similar to china on this subject
it's not just the usa; similar actions have happened in the uk and france regarding the genocide and they've also punished people for advocating for lgbtq rights in the past.
that feeling that you have regarding repression from countries like china is only a feeling; not reality.
that feeling that you have regarding repression from countries like china is only a feeling; not reality.
Even though we have many instances where this happened? And people dissapeared in Hong Kong? Come on, you must be joking.
i literally just pointed out many instances of the same thing happening outside of china; my point is that it happens everywhere and your feeling that it only happens is china is not reality.
Your comment only implied that it did not happen in China.
I still feel like it’s worse there. It happens everywhere sure, but not as much. Fuck their shitty firewall and fuck surveillance.
I’ll just stop here because we’re getting nowhere. You’re saying it happens everywhere, I agree, but feel like it happens more in China for example.
again, feelings are not facts
Those feelings are based on facts.
The great firewall, Hong Kong, censorship against other regimes and countries, Taiwan, social credit… fucking WeChat!?
You've already admitted that your feelings are not based on data or facts. And the fact you still think social credit is real or that "Taiwan" just as a word is condemnation of China certainly confirms that.
Social credit is real in some areas of China
I’ll just stop because that’s cringe. I’ve lost enough time already
I have no data and this is just a feeling.
This is a description of what being propagandised feels like; you have this feeling, but you can't put your finger on why.
Oh I know why, I just don’t have the data to confirm this and frankly, I don’t want to. I’ve heard enough to confirm this general feeling. People that have no interest in lying about this, getting sent in jail for minor things, or just seeing what the governments of these countries are saying, lying in plain sight.
I just don’t have the data to confirm this and frankly, I don’t want to. I’ve heard enough to confirm this general feeling.
What you are describing is called "confirmation bias"
I just have this feeling like you get persecuted for speaking against the government in countries like China, whereas you need to be a strong figure to have the same fate in other countries.
I have no data and this is just a feeling.
We can learn and take away a lot from this vibes-based, "democracy" virtue-signaling analysis, but not about the topic at hand.
This is still a cool way to downplay the West's imperial staple of suppressing activism, engages in revisionism and amplifies everything that helps liberalism, all while accusing everyone outside the imperial core of doing so (or doing worse) as well, the statement along the lines of "does worse" doesn't mean anything when you recognize that it's a Western idea fully embraced and embroidered by the West that is insurpassable/incomparable to any other form of censorship.
Freedom of speech is a meaningless concept, especially so for anyone that's not white, when you can't actually criticize EU/US/KKKommonwealth countries within these countries meaningfully without fear of losing your job, your house, your visa (this is exacerbated for foreigners, often not talked about) or your life.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/ice-warrant-mahmoud-khalil
Your "freedom" to "speech" and "democracy" are constrained within a clearly drawn boundary, the boundary of which is drawn by the ruling class.
Any other country outside the West engaging in censorship is either a) a dog of the West or b) protecting itself from fully succumbing into being a dog of the West.
Notice how a Westerner does not risk anything by truly believing in and expressing things like "china censorship bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet", but a non-Westerner risks absolutely everything by even slightly hinting at a criticism towards Western imperialism/wanting better conditions at the cost of the ruling class, perhaps even in their own damn fucking country, this is where point a) comes in to play.
When it comes to China, they fall squarely in b):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAEwoYIYgJA
Once you understand the asymmetry, it becomes a lot clearer why the "both sides" argument is just a feeble attempt at minimizing Western imperialism.
You're taking the USA as an example, and we all know the current situation is really fucking bad and not comparable to other western countries.
Your “freedom” to “speech” and “democracy” are constrained within a clearly drawn boundary, the boundary of which is drawn by the ruling class.
Sure, it is, but my point is that it's less restricted.
Notice how a Westerner does not risk anything by truly believing in and expressing things like “china censorship bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet”, but a non-Westerner risks absolutely everything by even slightly hinting at a criticism towards Western imperialism/wanting better conditions at the cost of the ruling class, perhaps even in their own damn fucking country
That's just a massive lie. It doesn't work this way, unless maybe you're in a far-right wing country like the USA rn. I'm in France and we have a lot of far-left people, communists and stuff, none of them are in jail. Saying such things as "bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet" would clearly get you in trouble, especially the "bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum" because it can't be argued that you were only talking about soldiers etc...
Any other country outside the West engaging in censorship is either a) a dog of the West or b) protecting itself from fully succumbing into being a dog of the West.
Yea sure, it's only "you're with, or against us". No in-between. haha
I'll just stop here because there's no point in this discussion and I feel like I'm just talking to a tankie, member of lemmygrad and hexbear, that hopped on its alt account.
You’re taking the USA as an example
So? How is it not comparable to other Western countries? The original post already fucking exemplifies why censorship is a staple of the West, not just the US. Swear to god libs like you don't actually have an argument to make and resort to moving goalposts to make up for it:
etc. etc.
Sure, it is, but my point is that it’s less restricted.
And that point is pointless because "less" restrictions only apply to small groups of people.
That’s just a massive lie. Notice how organized groups like the AfD, the National Rally, Renaissance etc.. still exist but any smaller scale organization of people that threatens imperialism get squashed ASAP:
https://www.commondreams.org/news/richard-medhurst
https://electronicintifada.net/content/switzerland-deports-eis-ali-abunimah/50337
https://www.newarab.com/news/pro-palestine-supporters-losing-jobs-over-gaza-solidarity
https://www.commondreams.org/news/ice-warrant-mahmoud-khalil
Saying such things as “bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet” would clearly get you in trouble
[citations needed]. I assure you that the most "trouble" libs faced was a slap on the wrist.
🤣 thanks for exposing yourself as nothing but a vibes-based liberal. Hasn't even produced a single shred of evidence either.
I feel like
This seems to be your go to justification for a lot
I prefer admitting it than lying like you do
it only enabled its operators access to encrypted communications...
what the heck? isnt this much worse than simple microphone access?
They are also dirty grubby disgusting liars. They can turn on the microphone while it is off. While the whole phone is "off" which it never really is. That's why you can't buy a phone without a removavle battery.
“Only”
“only”
"We only broke into your house and stole your shit, we didn't stab you in your sleep. You're welcome. "
Reminds me of when the NSA was spying on Yahoo Video calls so they could do their early facial recognition training.
Since it was a platform mostly used for video sex, The NSA literally made a public statement saying they had a system to blur genitals and that they were "only" training facial recognition data.
My mind was fucking blown. Who cares if you film my dick? That doesn't let you identity me from the MacDonald's cameras you hacked into. The face data is what we were worried about.
I think it means in the encrypted state. Still, bad.
Why does this not surprise me??
They hack Italian (i assume they are italian citizens) working with migrants. If real Italians arent safe from the Spying State, just imagine how safe the Data of South-Tyroleans is, italians northest province!
this is not how Italy works...
and who are you that you know this first hand? in italy? and even then you dont know as well as we do about the situation on the ground in south tyrol.
Cazzate
it seems I know it better than you though.
there are also journalists between the people who were spied.
load more comments
(5 replies)
This software is a fucking scourge on the world. We need to switch back to the original cell phones where only one person can use the tower at a time.
The original cell phones were unencrypted and anyone nearby with a receiver could listen in on your call, no?
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›