this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)

no context

1730 readers
222 users here now

A place for posting anything out of context. Please caption any posts PIC

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m kinda able to pick up context here from several very subtle clues, not gonna lie 😬

[–] ITguru 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

He done fucked up.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's not very typical, I'd like to make that point.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

Can't park there mate

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Building in the background is at 1001 R St NW, Washington, DC 20001.

It looks like the road (and fence) have been removed and the intersection is now a 3-way.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Who doesn’t love a three way?

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Appears to be legit colourised image and not ai slop. The sharpness of the image threw me.

Preview of black and white photo on alamy.

Apparently was colourised by /u/mygrapefruit.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

The quality you can get by scanning film is insane (assuming it’s been preserved correctly)

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

That was an expensive sound. At least a hundred dollars.

[–] Cooljimy84@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is one of the wheels missing its snow chain ?!?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Probably a reason of the crash I guess

[–] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

If my wiki-searching is right, those vehicles were rear-wheel drive.

So, it only needed chains on the rear tires.

Preferable to have them on the front tires too, but not required.

The front left might have fallen off while he was driving, or he might have only had the third one to begin with (possibly as an extra) and added it for additional traction in these poor conditions (but it wasn’t enough).

[–] glups@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, my horseless wagon

That wrought iron fence wasn't having any of it.

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not a forensic carologist but it almost looks like he got t-boned (old fashioned style at 25mph, of course) and lost control (at a brisk 27mph) and hit the fence

[–] burntrealm@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's hard to make fun of them when they were driving a 1500 lb steel box on what are essentially bicycle tires, hah. I imagine they have no grip whatsoever

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Bicycle tires with round nubbin tread! It looks like they're just about bald too, which I'm sure didn't help

I wonder if there's a way to bring that tread style to the modern world, it looks really interesting compared to what we have now (minus the baldness)

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

So they were aware of the icy conditions and applied chains on 2 (3?) of the tires. I wonder what's the story behind the rest not being covered (in case of the obvious "no more chain" scenario, what was the idea behind the diagonal alignment).

"I know what's wrong with it! Ain't got no gas in it!"

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Look up yonder, it's old McPhee, he's having a few, he can hardly see.. Wrapped his buggy around a tree, someone call the Mounties!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

β€œWell, there’s your problem.”