A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
Resources:
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
I know this is unsolicited advice, so apologies for that, but did you consider that the issue could also be your server hard drive failing? I guess not a possibility if its really only recently synced pictures. Just wanted to throw that in.
Regarding backing up photos, Immich works well for that but is also a lot more than just photo backup, so maybe not a preference for you.
I'd echo this. Syncthing is widely used because it Just Works in so many weird situations. So if it is Not Working, swapping out Syncthing might actually make the problem harder to solve.
That is actually a good question, in this case the HDD is totally fine. Thing is, the photos only get corrupted very rarely (probably 1 every 3000 or so, and only sometimes) and often photos that got transfered several times to the phone (usually the problem is in the phone. On the desktop never had that)
As for immich, I do know about of but seems to be a bit much for what I need (and only photos AFAIK)
..could it be your phone's storage is failing then?
Had a pixel 8, and now a new pixel 9a. I think the problem is actually a bit messy. On my house I have several access points. There is a chance when syncthing is working, and I am going up or down, phone changes the access point. Syncthing possibly gets a ' oppsie, didn't finish that! Let's go for the next one' kind of issue. Of course, never looked into logs or anything so this is just pure speculation.
Usually the kind of corruption on the photos is the kind that beginning is always there, but at some point gets replaced with gray, hence my theory about the files.
Yea, gotta be something odd with your setup.
Currently I have one phone (of several) thats syncing en excess of 10,000 files, some only on Wifi (with 3 access points), some wifi/cell data.
ST knows the state of a file, so a disconnect should have no effect. If you're getting corrupted files, I wonder if something else is going on which may also affect another sync tool.
Try Resilio for the same folders, see if you have the same problem (disable Syncthing of course, otherwise conflicting edits will cause file corruption).
Could be a bad AP.
I once had a switch with a failing power supply that would corrupt MP3 artwork when writing to the MP3. That was a weird one to track down.
That sounds like a crazy story to find out what the issue was. As I stated somewhere on the thread, ram is not the issue, and the APS are quite new (Aruba stuff that is 1 and a half year old). And the only situation I get this issues is with my phones in specific. I will probably use the smb solution stated before and see how is goes. If the thing still happens, then is hunting time
That's really weird. I've been using it for mobile-desktop-server-offsite sync for many years, with transfer sizes over 15TB, over WiFi, cellular, cable, fiber. I've never seen data corruption. Conflicts, sometimes. Permission issues, sometimes. Wiping something accidentally, sometimes. It's even more weird because Syncthing performs computes hash values for the files it manages. I don't know if it performs hash validation after copying remotely but if not, it can be forced manually which would tell you what's fucked and be pulled from the source, if it still exists.
Nevermind, it verifies the result:
When a block is copied or received from another device, its SHA256 hash is computed and compared with the expected value. If it matches the block is written to a temporary copy of the file, otherwise it is discarded and Syncthing tries to find another source for the block.
According to this, if you have data corruption it can only occur between copying/moving a temporary file on your destination to another directory, or it could occur on the source itself. Both of those scenarios are a cause of concern and would likely persist with any utility. Moving or copying a file from one location to another on a sane machine should not corrupt it. If I were you I'd ensure my server doesn't eat bits. If not the storage media, it could be bit rot, or bad RAM.
Just in case everything seems fine, let me tell you what I dealt with. I had a Ryzen 5950X machine with 32GB of RAM. It worked well since inception with no signs of RAM or data corruption issues. I test every new machine with Memtest86+. At some point I migrated the storage from Ext4 on LVMRAID to ZFS. All good. Then I wrote an alarm for Prometheus to tell me if there's any issues in ZFS. A week later I get an email about a ZFS error. I check the system - says checksum errors, data has been corrected, applications unaffected, run a scrub to clear. I ran a scrub. A few more checksum errors found, all corrected, we're clean now. There was a strong solar storm around that time, probably that. A couple of weeks later I get another email. Same symptoms, same procedure. No solar storm. Shit. Memtest86+ - pass. Hm. A couple of weeks later I get another. Same thing. Memtest again - nothing. This went on for several months. Meanwhile the off-site backup sees nothing like that. While running Memtest on another machine I noticed that the test passes following the first took longer than the first, a lot longer. I thought something might be wrong with that machine. Dug into it, got into Memtest's source code and discovered that the first pass is shorter on purpose so that it quickly flags obviously bad RAM. Apparently if you want to detect less obvious issues, you have to run multiple passes. OK. Memtest the main server again, pass 1: OK, pass 2: OK, pass 3: OK, pass 4: FAIL. FUCK. Memtest each stick separately for 4 passes: OK. Memtest 2 at a time: OK. Memtest all 4: FAIL. Alright, now we know why ZFS keeps finding checksum errors. Long story short, this machine could not run this RAM in 4-DIMM config. Replaced it with another RAM that's rated to run in 4-DIMM config on that processor. No more checksum issues. If I was running the older Ext4-on-LVMRAID storage stack, I would have caught NONE of these and it would have happily corrupted files here and there. In fact it likely did and I have some corruption. Moral of the story - run many Memtest passes and use checksumming storage stack like ZFS or Btrfs. I strongly recommend ZFS since its stripe RAID works fine unlike Btrfs'es. If you don't find bad RAM, start using it today, even if you're working with a single disk and add redundancy when you can. Only after change Syncthing for something else if you still somehow get corruption without ZFS'es knowledge. And if ZFS tells you that you have checksum errors, you likely have bad hardware.
Dug into it, got into Memtest’s source code and discovered that the first pass is shorter on purpose so that it quickly flags obviously bad RAM. Apparently if you want to detect less obvious issues, you have to run multiple passes.
I thought it was common knowledge that Memtest needed to be run for multiple passes to truly verify there are no issues. Seems that's one of those things that stopped being passed down in the community over the years. Back when I was first learning about overclocking around 2005 that was emphasized HEAVILY, with the recommendation to run it at least overnight, and a minimum of 10 passes.
It's kind of embarrassing because I used to work as a service technician at a popular computer store in the 2000s and Memtest86+ has been a standard fare of testing. I guess outside of OC, the shorter first pass truly was enough to spot bad RAM in the vast majority of cases. Plus multichannel interactions were not nearly as prevalent in the DDR1/2/3 days. I recently installed 4 DIMMS for 128GB on an AM5 machine just to discover that the 5600 RAM only boots at 3600 in a 4-DIMM config, as per AMD's docs. Could force it higher but without extra adjustment it can't go beyond 4600 on this machine. Back in the day, different DIMMs, often with different chips worked in 2, 4-DIMM configs so long as they matched their JEDEC spec. backinmyday.jpg
Yeah AMD's memory controllers, especially DDR5 seem to have a lot more difficulty at high speed with 4 slots filled. I used to plan upgrades around populating 2 slots and doubling if needed a few years later, instead now you really need to plan to ignore those slots if you are needing memory performance for things like gaming versus raw capacity.
The software should inform the user to run atleast 10 passes in the UI
This post doesn't benefit me at all but I love how long it is.
Let me tell you about diagnosing a reproducible crash on that 5950X system after swapping the RAM with verified good modules. An issue I only discovered because I decided to warm myself using Folding@home for a couple of cold days while my building was switching the central heating on. 😂
That is some good info here. My HDD is totally fine (checked it very recently actually), as for the ram last time I checked was ok, but can check again to be sure
Check my edit.
That is some crazy story right there. I do know for a fact that memtest needs multiple passes. But in my case the machine only has 1 stick of ram (used to have 2, one died). I will probably do a memtest overnight and get at you tomorrow.
(used to have 2, one died)
That would make me immediately look to the RAM as the possible source or corruption. If it used to be a matched pair and one stick died, the odds of the other being on its way out are MUCH higher than normal. I would never trust that matched stick.
Finished an all nighter memtest with a total of 12 passes. All good on the ram side
Crazy, thought for sure it would fail testing.
Still wouldn't trust it personally after a failed stick from a matched pair regardless of what the test says though.
Condolences, you just switched to Ultra-Violence.
Is Syncthing my ideal backup application?¶
No. Syncthing is not a great backup application because all changes to your files (modifications, deletions, etc.) will be propagated to all your devices. You can enable versioning, but we encourage you to use other tools to keep your data safe from your (or our) mistakes.
https://docs.syncthing.net/users/faq.html#is-syncthing-my-ideal-backup-application
Sync is sync. Sync is NOT backup.
This is why you should have file history versioning on. With backup this is a most.
First and foremost Syncthing is not a 'backup' utility. Using it for backup is not at all recommended. Especially if you are dealing with Android or Raspberry pi, because the way clock / time works in these systems are pretty weird and create sync conflicts. So don't.
Now to the solution. For backup, use a proper backup solution like Kopia. Modern solutions support browsing the snapshots created as backups. Also creating periodic snapshots ensures better redundancy and better chance for disaster recovery.
Now if you will not use it for backup, take a look at 'Round Sync' available in F-Droid. It's an application built around the execptionally good app, 'rclone'. It is some what similar to Syncthing, but designed in a very different way. Also it is more difficult to configure to copy the files to PC.
I also wanted to mention that I have used Syncthing for many heavy lifting jobs and never faced issues with it. It is a feature complete app, with the philosophy of doing only one thing and doing it perfectly. So if you run into any issues, do reach out to forums or devs. They will definitely help you.
Curious about your point about time conflicts. Doesn't syncthing look at the change on your machine compared to the 'canonical' list also stored on your machine? So even if the timestamp is different, syncthing still detects the change, and the only problem is if the file is simultaneously modified on another machine before being propagated - which would be a conflict anyway.
It didn't work like that for me. I must admit I didn't dig deep to clearly see what is the problem. So my setup had a Windows Pc, a Raspberry Pi 5, and an Android phone, sharing a folder which had notes.
Whenever I save any changes in Windows machine, the android used gets updated without much issue, but the Raspberry Pi caused conflicts. When looked at the time stamps they were different and it looked to me like the Raspberry Pi 5 Syncthing is sending the old file as new one, because of the save time.
It read somewhere the issue is with how time is handled in Rasberry Pi. So I disabled the Raspberry Pi Syncthing and went on, because that was not really needed.
Really surprised about this. I am using syncthing now for many years on various devices and never encountered issues with it. And also, file sync is not a backup solution.
Ditto.
I get angry with SyncThing; don't get me wrong. I really wish they'd add a per-file-type merge plugin capability, and I get far more sync conflicts than I care for. I get situations where a client on one computer stops (mostly, Android killing it) and it needs to be manually restarted.
What I've never had it data corruption. It's to the point where I implicitly trust that if SyncThing says it's synced, I know it's on the destination. It might be a stored as a sync conflict, but it's there.
I've not had files get corrupted, that's strange, for sure.
Some options (but it really depends on what you're trying to do):
Resilio Sync (cross-platform, battery eater on mobile, but has a useful feature - Selective Sync)
FolderSync on Android (can also be battery intense)
Native tools and scheduling on Linux and Windows.
Maybe a review of the setup is in order, what your devices are, what you're trying to do. Sync may not be the tool for what you're trying to do.
I use a combination of tools for different jobs and devices.
Generally, all files on mobile are synced to home using Syncthing-Fork. For example, on Android I have a sync job("folder") in ST for every root folder on the device. These get synced to home depending on conditions (e.g. DCIM syncs over any network, any power condition, so I don't lose photos, while Backups and Download only sync on power over wifi, since they're big and not critical).
Between desktop OS's I largely use OS-specific tools, because I don't really need sync there, but file copy and comparison on a schedule.
After 10 years and probably 1TB+ of sync, I haven't lost any files via ST. Currently have 5 phones running jobs back to a server. I've even moved Syncthing from one server to another with no issues. With how ST works, I think file corruption is highly unlikely - it even handles in-use files safely.
SMB (the protocol) works across devices and OS's, and I use SMBSync2 to dump my photos to my NAS + off site
https://files.catbox.moe/rpqu4h.jpg
This has worked fine for me for years even thou the app isn't on the Play Store anymore, and is fairly granular in regards to file types and where you wanna back them up
This is an interesting one, will check. Thanks! I do have some smb stuff already on the machine, so this might be an easier solution
I love it, and along with the folder they get dumped into being R/O means Immich (and by extension me.....) can't fugg up the timeline ;)
This seems very odd, I've been using syncthing for a good 5 years and never had a single file corrupt - might be worth opening an issue on their github
I am using rsync triggered by cronjobs for this task now for... well... nearly forever.
If you ask Syncthing how to do local sync (e.g. to an external HDD), the answer is, use the right tool for the job: Unison.
If you ask Unison how to do certain things (directory timestamps is the one I miss), the answer is, use the right tool for the job: rsync.
In the end, it all comes down to rsync.
P.S. I'm actually gradually migrating up the chain from rsync, having used my own hand-built utility to make convenient rsync commands, but now using syncthing and Unison more.
FolderSync selectively syncs files/folders from my phone back to my server via ssh. Some folders are on a schedule, some monitor for changes and sync immediately; most are just one-way, some are two-way (files added to the server will sync back to the phone as well as uploading data to the server). There's even one that automatically drops files into paperless-ngx' consume folder for automatic document importing.
From there BorgBackup makes a daily backup of the data, keeping historical backups for years with absolutely incredible efficiency. I currently have 21 backups of about ~550gb each. Borg stores this in 447gb of total disc space.
I had some similar and obscure corruption issues that wound up being a symptom of failing ram in a main server node. After that, only issues have been conflicts. So I'd suggest checking hardware health in addition to the ideas about backups vs sync.
What about Nextcloud? It's heavier than syncthing, but would be an alternative.
From what I tried, next cloud just has so much clutter that makes the syncing part a bit of a slog. If that was rock solid with OK speeds, that would be nice. But there is somich stuff with it that I don't care and tries to enforce (like users and user groups) that I find just too much
I use roundsync for Camera upload. Works well.
