this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
319 points (99.7% liked)

science

18426 readers
521 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will no longer track the cost of climate change-fueled weather disasters, including floods, heat waves, wildfires and more. It is the latest example of changes to the agency and the Trump administration limiting federal government resources on climate change.

NOAA falls under the U.S. Department of Commerce and is tasked with daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings and climate monitoring. It is also parent to the National Weather Service.

The agency said its National Centers for Environmental Information would no longer update its Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters database beyond 2024, and that its information — going as far back as 1980 — would be archived.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

OK. I assure you, the insurance industry will continue to track it.

This is the same logic as "if we stop testing, the disease goes away"

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Costs will go way down next year because the president x'd out hurricanes. All better now.

In other news, car crash injuries are up because seat belts keep saving those pesky survivors. The stats were better when corpses didn't count.

[–] LadyButterfly@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Many cancers have been cured cos the person ignored it

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Quite whimsical. Especially hilarious this is done after gutting FEMA. Adding a lol or lmao even since nayural catastrophes are starting very soon.

If there was no other evidence that current goverment is composed of russian agents then this is. This serves no purpose other than to go out of their way to cause suffering and to cripple another countries emergency services. Two things russia loves beyond everything.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

🙈🙉

🔥🚨🌊🪦

😲😲🤯

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The year is 2039, Florida has been perpetually under hurricanes for 3 weeks straight as hurricane after hurricane makes landfall. After careful review, it's been determined that the hurricanes have caused $0.00 in damage. There's nothing to be concerned about. FEMA has not been dispatched as there is no emergency.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Also, barely any Florida.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The GOP Climate Change plan of action has been revealed. It is a three pronged plan:

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

...while being evil.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 58 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This won't fool the insurance companies. They're the ones on the hook for this.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Depends. Some of their CEOs will shamelessly bow to the party line, though not all. Definitely not Berkshire-Hathaway.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Uh, no they won’t?

The entire business model of insurance is to understand risk and assign a cash-value to it. Ignoring risk means their business model falls apart. They’re not going to ignore risk, in any dimension. And if they’re MADE to “ignore” risk in a particular dimension… they’re still going to analyze it and have actuarial tables around it, and will instead just factor it in by raising prices across the board.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean? They have to update their risk models or they'll go out of business unless I'm misunderstanding.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

They will have to pick between lip service (and hiding the changes by, say, quietly pulling out of places?) and government retribution. Mark my words, at some point they will go after any kind of “climate agenda.”

And that balance will depend on leadership. I mentioned Berkshire specifically because (at the top level, at least) they’re pretty old school with a low tolerance for nonsense, and big enough to eat the retribution.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

No they'll just say what the government wants and do what they have to anyway. Hypocrisy is the way they operate already.

Trump only gives a shit about what people say publicly anyway. It's the single most important thing for him.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lol no they aren't and don't give two shits.

[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Are insurance companies not on the hook for the properties they insure?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yes. They can deny for any reason, mostly shareholders. It is primarily a for-profit scam industry who will sign anyone up for premiums that will pay out nothing.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago

Every second the bastard exists is a fucking tragedy

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago

"If we stop testing for Covid or numbers will go down."

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 21 points 19 hours ago

Out of sight out of mind. Kind of like the wasteland the south is going to become after the next couple of years of storms.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Bye Florida

[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Yes, that will really make it all better and stop any further damage from climate related issues. Just like not looking at the power bill means that I don't have to pay it.