this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
258 points (99.6% liked)

science

18426 readers
482 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will no longer track the cost of climate change-fueled weather disasters, including floods, heat waves, wildfires and more. It is the latest example of changes to the agency and the Trump administration limiting federal government resources on climate change.

NOAA falls under the U.S. Department of Commerce and is tasked with daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings and climate monitoring. It is also parent to the National Weather Service.

The agency said its National Centers for Environmental Information would no longer update its Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters database beyond 2024, and that its information — going as far back as 1980 — would be archived.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

🙈🙉

🔥🚨🌊🪦

😲😲🤯

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The year is 2039, Florida has been perpetually under hurricanes for 3 weeks straight as hurricane after hurricane makes landfall. After careful review, it's been determined that the hurricanes have caused $0.00 in damage. There's nothing to be concerned about. FEMA has not been dispatched as there is no emergency.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

Also, barely any Florida.

Every second the bastard exists is a fucking tragedy

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The GOP Climate Change plan of action has been revealed. It is a three pronged plan:

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

...while being evil.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 48 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This won't fool the insurance companies. They're the ones on the hook for this.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Depends. Some of their CEOs will shamelessly bow to the party line, though not all. Definitely not Berkshire-Hathaway.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean? They have to update their risk models or they'll go out of business unless I'm misunderstanding.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They will have to pick between lip service (and hiding the changes by, say, quietly pulling out of places?) and government retribution. Mark my words, at some point they will go after any kind of “climate agenda.”

And that balance will depend on leadership. I mentioned Berkshire specifically because (at the top level, at least) they’re pretty old school with a low tolerance for nonsense, and big enough to eat the retribution.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

No they'll just say what the government wants and do what they have to anyway. Hypocrisy is the way they operate already.

Trump only gives a shit about what people say publicly anyway. It's the single most important thing for him.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago

Lol no they aren't and don't give two shits.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago

"If we stop testing for Covid or numbers will go down."

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Bye Florida

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 19 points 13 hours ago

Out of sight out of mind. Kind of like the wasteland the south is going to become after the next couple of years of storms.

[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Yes, that will really make it all better and stop any further damage from climate related issues. Just like not looking at the power bill means that I don't have to pay it.