this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

News

14 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (34 children)

Is this really the content that we want for @news ?

We have an endless reserve of European politicians talking about other European politicians. At least try to keep this kind of content for @politics.

[–] ErraticDragon@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Is this really the content that we want for @news ?

Yes, overwhelmingly so, it seems:

imgur

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nameless_prole@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The beauty of this fediverse thing is, that... if you don't like it you can make your own instance and do the thing you want there instead. Bye.

[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

You know, if you want to be a pain in the ass we can also kick you out of this place.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] lunar_parking@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The supreme court even as a concept is one of the most asinine yet accepted institutions in the world. On par with the Catholic church, but so much worse because it actually has enormous and direct power over 330+ million people. I am dreaming and pining for the day that someone in power, most likely a president, just legitimately tells them to fuck off. They have no enforcement power and they fucking know it. I'm yearning for someone to have the courage, but it's as clear as it possibly can be that it certainly won't be a Democrat.

[–] Neferic@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on the comparison to the church? You don't like a panel having authority so you want to consolidate it to a president unilaterally ignoring the third branch? Would term limits on judges change how you see the court?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zalack@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing is that the court only has so much power right now because Congress is so fucking broken. If Congress where in working order it could just legislate all the shit that the court is blocking the executive on.

[–] Neferic@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is there any sense when Congress went off the rails? Some folks I have listened to say it was around the 90s but there were obviously very contentious times before then.

The Congress has never consistently functioned well, I'm not entirely convinced it's designed to. For the current mess, both in Congress and American politics in general, probably the most influential source is Newt Gingrich's electioneering policy of attacking wedges and saying anything you have to to get headlines without regards to the truthfulness of your statements. That's what reshaped the Republican party to be particularly welcoming to extremists, popularized science denial, and led to the modern wave of Christian Nationalism.

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/07/07/newt-gingrich-republican-party

[–] Neferic@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I am sympathetic to Kagan's argument on standing and similarly I understand why Roberts is trying to lower the pressure. In any case this seems to come back to Congress no longer passing legislation and instead relying on executive powers for all political requirements. Not really seeing a solution until primary rules change. Centrists are left unserved presently.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Snowflake behavior

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›