this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

News

14 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well if the court didn't engage in clearly partisan politics, maybe the liberal justices wouldn't have anything to criticize.

Does he realize how bad it looks when he voices that his problem is criticism and not like, I don't know, taking money from political interests? Or refusing to recuse in cases where there's a relative directly involved?

[–] sab@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is really incredible how far down the drain the SCOTUS has gone in such a short period of time. Not saying it was great before Justice Kennedy retired either, but at least back then it was generally respected.

[–] kmkz_ninja@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hope RoyGBiv is rolling in her grave at refusing to step down and let Obama select a replacement when she knew the power of her position.

[–] sethadam1@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do you think they would've filled her spot when they didn't fill the other one with Merrick Garland? She protected her spot or they would've held it up until Trump.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

She could have retired at any time, including right after Obama was elected. The Republicans couldn't have held the spot open for years. It would have become a major election issue.

[–] Johnvanjim@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd bet good money McConnell would have tried to find a way/reason to keep it open, look at all the rules making/breaking they did to fill/keep a seat empty close to elections, I'm sure they'd just come up with some other bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ochaos@feddit.online 1 points 2 years ago

There was a time that I believed they wouldn't or couldn't of held a seat for years... but that time is past.

[–] nameless_prole@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, she's dead which means she will never even have the capacity to understand what her decision meant.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Why won't they just let us make wildly unpopular decisions that jeopardize the livelihoods of Americans without having to make us feel bad about it?!"

-Roberts, 2023

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

"Why can't we be blatantly corrupt without getting called on it? "

[–] Niello@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

None of these people deserve their positions.

[–] nameless_prole@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know, I like Sotomayor. And Brown-Jackson seems alright. And I really don't have much opinion on Kagan aside from the fact that I usually agree with her rulings. As for Conservatives, I disagree with all of them almost always, but Gorsuch at least seems to care about consistency, and I think his views on Native affairs is admirable.

[–] Niello@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

If it's not clear, I mean all the conservatives that clearly were put there for nefarious reasons. And none of them deserves a life time position on the supreme court regardless, and by them here I mean everyone, not just conservatives.

[–] dosidosankofa@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Holy crap this is endgame. The head of the judicial body is too concerned about the feelings of the body?

So, just logically. I have a personal commitment and value to something. And somebody gets mad at me about it. My values and commitment should be able to withstand that? Yes? As soon as someone has a different opinion it's like "I can't bear to hear a different opinion (clutches pearls) and I can't stand to have my opinion critiqued"

For you and me and the lady in the checkout line (and I say that as a lady who is often in checkout lines), that's great. But this is the head of the judicial body of one of the most powerful nations - most powerful democracies - on earth. These are opinions that shape the lives of 300 million people at least. And he's gonna be there for another quarter of a century.

Like how many steps is Roberts from a kind of de facto chilling effect, and I'm not trying to be funny

Thank God for the generations who hear a public figure try to corral or control a situation and then begin to act in doing the exact opposite. Definitely need to remind the conservative justices that there are people out here

End rant (for now)

[–] RestrictedAccount@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I don’t think he is anywhere near a chilling effect on the liberal justices.

They main problem we have with SCOTUS is that they don’t have to GAF what anybody says.

That is good if the person has principles, but has problems if they are grifting trash.

The thing he should be complaining about is the bribes - I’m sorry, speech - that the justices are taking. But since he gets 8 figures of speech by consulting gigs for his wife, there is no chance the Chief Grifter will tackle the real problem.

[–] swope@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let me know when Roberts begs the others to stop taking massive gifts that look like bribes.

[–] sab@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Tsk, they only look like bribes if you're looking. You should stop doing that as well.

[–] rebul@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I read the entire article, could not find any mention of Roberts 'begging' the liberal justices for anything. Is my reading comprehension lacking, or is the headline click bait hyperbole?

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

People should be silent while we destroy their future - Roberts, 2023

load more comments
view more: next ›