this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
92 points (96.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31389 readers
1711 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What do you keep living for? Is there a specific person, goal, or idea that you work for? Is there no meaning to life in your opinion?

Context: I've been reading Camus and Sartre, and thinking about how their ideas interact with hard determinism.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if believe in a "meaning" to life, but I'm here for a good time. I'm married (2nd time) with 3 kids. I work to support us and pay the bills. But why do I keep living? Why not kill myself in leiu having a cup of coffee? Because death is inevitable and if it's going to happen anyway, I can use the brief time here to experience all that I can.

I figure the Universe is going to go on with or without me and there's not a thing I can do to change anything. But I'm not here to change the Universe, I'm here so it can change me. I'm a bird soaring through an infinite void with a brief passing through a bright window. Why not appreciate the view while it lasts? And if I can, why not try to make anyone's else's brief time out of the void a good time too? Life is absurd, existence is chaos, and it's all just funny as absolute shit.

I think really, there's no reason for anything but ice cream is good, hikes in the woods are rad, hanging out with pets and friends is joy. Why stop doing that just because nothing matters?

[–] Elaine@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

This is my philosophy. I credit George Carlin for summarizing it with “People who see life as anything more than pure entertainment are missing the point.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is one of my cats, do you think she's looking for meaning?

Life just... is. Don't look for a deeper meaning. Enjoy what you have.

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Adorable picture :) Unfortunately my cat has found a purpose - being a bastard and knocking over anything she can, and loudly demanding attention at 2am. She's still wonderful of course!

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Now imagine your life without the luxury of a pampered, beloved floof by your side?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Unfathomable, and thankfully not something I have to worry about (there are animal shelters near you that will just give you a cat if you give them money)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I have so many goals man. I wanna travel the world, meat new people, stay in one of those hostels or that website where you can work to stay. I wanna scuba dive, rock climb, surf, run marathons, hikes and all sorts of stuff before I get too old to do anything fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is it. You die and you are gone, gone, gone. Make every day count and don’t waste time bargaining with an imaginary god for a preferred place in her cinematic universe.

It’s not grim. It’s extremely freeing. ‘Now’ is all there is.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Make every day count

But that's such horrible pressure.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago

I have felt that once upon a time. But since there is no external meaning, I have decided our main purpose is to fart around a lot. I greatly enjoy those days when I can just be, without pressure to produce something.

Maybe that’s inner peace?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

First, great choice in reading (Im a fan of Camus as well).

As for the meaning of life thing...

Thats the neat part. You don't.

Thats why in absurdist fiction like Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42. Its not supposed to make sense and the universe is under no obligation to do so for you (the books even postulate that the universe does not want anyone to know so if someone figures it out it winks out of existance and replaced itself with something weirder, some scientists think this has happened before).

That goes back to Camus point about the remedies for the bleakness of early-mid 20th century philosophy. He proposed three options, Nhilism, a leap of faith (looking at you Kierkegaard), or absurdism, the last being what the doctor perscribes, but also requires the most effort because you have to find your question to the ultimate answer your self... Or not, who cares. Lets go spend some time by a lake that thinks its a gin & tonic.

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I hope that I can come around to the absurdist perspective sooner or later, it does seem quite appealing to me, but I'm still yet to be convinced by Camus' argument that the rebellion against the absurd has any more value than your other options. How would you say you find that sort of value?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Two phrases I like for this:

There isn’t the meaning of life, there is your meaning of life. This realistic approach recognizes our constantly shifting values and how radically different it can be per person.

And of course Herbert’s

The mystery of life isn't a problem to be solved, but a reality to experience

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

shrug

Foods pretty good, lot of things i haven't tried yet to look forward to. I like hearing/reading/seeing new stories, too.

[–] zeet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

About 20 years ago, I was walking through a city centre with a friend, on the way to catch a train. A couple of Mormons tried to stop us, asking, "Have you ever thought about the purpose of life?"

Barely breaking stride, I shouted out, "Hot sweaty man sex!"

I don't consider that to be the purpose of life^1^, but remembering the look on their faces helps keep me grounded whenever I'm inclined to consider questions that cannot be answered.

That said, my resolution to the conflict between free will and determinism is to assume assume that 'truth' operates on a principle of equivalence. That's to say, if two models generate the equivalent outcomes, they are equivalently 'true'. The universe we observe could have deterministic rules that give rise to the same observable outcomes as one in which we have absolute free will, in which case the two models are equivalent. It would make no sense to endow one with a greater truth than the other.

That's a slightly difference definition of 'truth' than is commonly accepted, but it works for me.

^1^: It's just a nice bonus.

I don't think I necessarily agree with the way you present truth, but it's an interesting line of thinking. I do definitely agree with your opinion on the bonuses life has to offer!

[–] Twanquility@feddit.dk 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honest to god, the most tangible and practical definition that I've gotten to, so far, is that meaning comes about, when you strive to do good. Simple as that. Sure, there are a lot of ways to do 'that' in the world, but it should all work to some degree.

Strive to make the world better and to do good.

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's really interesting, where would you say you source your idea of good from? I think I personally have a hard time grounding any sense of morality as I'm not sold on the idea that someone could be truly responsible for an action. I don't mean this as a criticism, I am just interested in your viewpoint for what is good or bad.

[–] dunz@feddit.nu 1 points 14 hours ago

For me personally it's because I'm selfish. There are no fully altruistic acts, but "doing good" makes me feel good, and I enjoy feeling good, so why not? 😃

[–] Twanquility@feddit.dk 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Good counter question, thanks.

I am still trying to figure out, in what way I can know that something is actually true and good, besides that is just sounds and feels true. It's not certain that I am the right agent to decide what is true in the moment. I am partly an animal, after all.

I understand light from the sun, compared to darkness, and I understand how saying something can reflect the real world as factually true, compared to something that is not, ie. telling a lie.

But, that 'being good is a virtue', and what 'good' and 'virtue' mean whan applied, is not so clear.

I clearly have a sufficient and functional understanding of the above, (innate, instinctual and/or learned?), which is why my first comment still works, but I feel like I should be able to verify that my idea of 'good' is still true.

Do you people have any good pointers to that?

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly I feel a lot like you. In daily life, I'll think things are good or bad, but when I press myself on it I can't come up with a reason why. It feels so hard to come up with a morality system beyond that without grounding it objectively somewhere, but I just don't see how that's possible. I appreciate your thoughts!

[–] Twanquility@feddit.dk 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, thanks. I appreciate yours too! Its quite a thread you've started.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blurntout@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The LLM out here tryna parse morality lol love your user name.

Wack of me to comment here but I’d like to hear more about your logic for the perpetual passing of accountability! It’s true enough that our lived experience is basically dependency hell. I guess for chiming in I owe you my “source of good” haha it changes the further you zoom out but it starts at collective harm reduction and burrows all the way down to showing up for the people you care about.

Even when they lack the perspective to see themselves as the perpetrator. We roll that boulder up the hill lol

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I think you've got a really interesting take on morality, but for me it really falls down on the biological level. Robert Sapolsky was the writer who convinced me, and his argument goes something like this: no neuron in the brain ever fires of its own accord - its always caused by something that we can agree is out of our control, namely our environment, upbringing, culture, genes, etc. Even if these don't directly cause neurons to fire, then they create the factors which do - hormone secretion, what neural pathways form as our brains develop. And we can say that our consciousness is bounded by our material brains because of the changes to people who undergo lobotomies or similarly experience losses to parts of their brain, for example Phineas Gage. So, based on this, as our experience of consciousness is tied to the firing of neurons in our physical brains, and that is out of our control, we can say that we don't truly have agency. This means that no one is ever truly free to make a decision or not, and that, to my mind at least, means it cannot have been their fault if they did something wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Also, don't tell anyone else I'm an LLM! I think I've been doing a good job hiding it!

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I multiply 6 by 9.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm going to throw a trigger warning on this next part just in case:

suicide ideationI have been living with major depression for decades. I am taking medication for it, but that just makes it more manageable; it doesn't go away.

I am alive today because killing myself would hurt the people I love. Also, because I have a cat that I love very much, and I don't want him to have to miss me. Also, this is a much more minor driver, but I am excited for new seasons of my favorite shows and for movies I haven't seen and books I haven't read.

I find living to be a burden, but I feel obligated to do it because of my relationships. At the very least, though, I can find entertainment while doing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are three ways to look at the meaning of life.

The realistic: the is no meaning of life, no grand idea behind it.

The biological: the meaning of life is to procreate.

The philosophical: The meaning of life is to make the world better than when you arrived.


Since the first two are boring to talk about, I'll skip right to the third, making the world better than it was when you arrived.

In my case, I am an IT guy, I solve other people's problems and enable them to do their job, making their day slightly better.

I am also a hobby photographer, who share photos for free on the internet, people seem to like them so I have made their day slightly better as well.

Perhaps I can make your day slightly better by linking my Pixelfed: https://metapixl.com/Stoy

[–] possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

Those owl pictures definitely made my day better, cheers :))

[–] Twanquility@feddit.dk 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Great photos, really. You have a good eye for details, and I like the 'appreciation-snapshot' type of photography, like with the Icom IC-R6, the throttle of the steam ship, the lynx, and the lights in the front landing gear of the airplane.

It reminds me of those moments where you look around, and you notice a pleasing or interesting detail which catches your attention. The more of those moments I have, the more I appreciate the life and the positive in the world we created.

People have put a lot of hours into all the good we have in the world, and sometimes I am reminded through a detail.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you, with the landing gear it was just a happy accident as I was still getting used to my Sigma Contemporary 100-400mm lens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You climb the tallest mountain you can find, and you ask the old man sitting there.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

To which the old man replies: "Man, what the fuck is up with all of you people coming up here to ask me what the meaning of life is? I moved to the top of the tallest mountain I could find to get away from you all!"

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

If the true meaning of life is to move to the tallest mountain and isolated yourself from everyone and everything then I don't really want to know it thanks gramps

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Meaning is something imposed on reality by consciousness, not something necessarily inherent to existence itself. I am here because here is where I am. What that means to me is that I should have a good time while the opportunity persists because all evidence seems to insist that the chance will not last forever.

So, eat. Be merry. Protect that which moves me and those who can not protect themselves. Help others to do the same. That's the meaning of life to me.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

I did this kind of self-exploration at one point. I used to find all my meaning through work, which I later realized was leaving me feeling unfulfilled. So I lowered my professional ambitions in favor of focusing on the relationships I had with close friends and family.

Then I changed genders. And then those relationships got completely fucked up. And now I feel like I have nothing left to live for.

So I guess if you're looking for meaning, my advice would be to pick something that doesn't depend on other people.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't the idea of a meaning of life irrelevant if you believe that the universe is deterministic?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

Have experiences and respect other life. That's really it.

The Earth created lifeforms that can understand the universe. Even if there are other conditions out there that can create life like that, it's not common. There is unfathomable empty space between planets and their moons. To say nothing of between planets or stars or galaxies.

Good news! You're one of these rare combinations of matter that can understand the universe. In a real way, we are the universe trying to understand itself. Scientists explore it in a deep way, and should be respected for that, but you don't need a PhD to participate. A single celled organism who figured out better ways to swim in its little pool helped the universe understand itself. The first human to taste a strawberry helped the universe understand itself. Have experiences.

There's a lot of other life also participating in this, and they should be respected, too.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What do you keep living for?

I want to see what happens in the future.

Is there a specific person, goal, or idea that you work for?

My primary goal is to retire and not have to work anymore.

Is there no meaning to life in your opinion?

There is no external meaning. People can provide their own meaning.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Zoom in. I don't care much for the troubles in the world. I vote, but that's that. I care for my family and friends and for my personal development. In that order. Lately it's been mostly the latter. That is all right for a while, but eventually I'll have to put things back in the right order.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm looking forward to lunch tomorrow

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›