this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

Demeta

82 readers
3 users here now

Overview:

Boycott Mark Zuckerberg!

Alternatives:

!friendica@lemmy.ca

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m ok with it if they were targeting vulnerable teens with ads for how to improve their lives…but somehow I doubt that’s what happened.

[–] Jimius@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago

They knew instagram was leading mainly teenage girls to commit suicide. But sat on that for years instead of acting on it. I would not be surprised if they targeted sleeping pill ads to users who appear suicidal.

[–] kamstrup@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Targeting vulnerable people based on metadata with any form of commercial intent, is morally and ethically highly questionable! A vulnerable person is by definition extremely susceptible to exploitation. Assuming that companies are gonna act out of philanthropy and goodness of their hearts seems a bit naiive.

[–] kefalos@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

“And you know this how?”

“They paid me a million buck a year to build it, your honour “

[–] nick@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

I’m listening to this book. It’s fucking infuriating