this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1246 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
5003 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mooncake@lemm.ee 17 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

It's time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention 'sex, gender, or sexual orientation', which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"Gender" means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn't protect trans people, for example. We don't know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don't consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with "gender identity and expression".

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

This is not a legal contract, it's a general guideline for users about what is or isn't acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn't matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What matters is how this affects enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 16 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You still think things are run by reasonable people?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 39 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

[–] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It used to say gender expression and identity. If it doesn't, that's a deliberate decision that could cause enforcement calls like 'well that's not your REAL gender so this isn't harassment'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›