this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1555 points (92.4% liked)

memes

13986 readers
2352 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I get the sentiment, but check out the length of the Taoist cannon, it would challenge even some modern day myth lengths like Marvel super hero comics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There is also an idea in philosophy of science called "pessimistic meta induction". Basically the concept is that science is a continually evolving process where we get increasingly accurate understanding about how things work. However since science progresses by falsifying previously held beliefs we can speculate that all of our current scientific theories are technically false.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

I feel like it depends on the person.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 2 points 4 days ago

This meme was made by a "know it all".

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

There are multiple points in human history where science has overestimated itself.

In Abrahamic religions, God is all knowing, not people. Eastern religions are more abstract, some have all knowing deities and some do not.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You do realize that's straight up not true right? As a Muslim I don't know how much of a thing biblical scholarship is, but on the Muslim side of things, uh... yeah. Literally no Muslim will say they "know everything", because the non-scholars vaguely know they don't know shit and the scholars will tell you "I don't know shit".

[–] Blueshift@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I interpret the image as saying: (some) religious people believe all answers worth knowing have already been revealed to us, and can only be found through study of the same few religious texts written hundreds of years ago. So those religious people don’t necessarily feel they already know everything, but they are convinced that the religious texts are the source of all knowledge.

I don’t know enough about Islam to claim that this applies, but it certainly applied to Christianity up until the enlightenment: there was no point in doing experiments to find out more about the world, the answer was already in the Bible. If you couldn’t see it yet, you needed to study the Bible more.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

That wasn't quite it. The church believed the natural sciences fit within a framework of metaphysical doctrine. The church engaged in all sorts of research and experiments because they believed it would prove the truth. People like Darwin and Copernicus and such were all commissioned by the church to develop and research their work.

What happened was there became a growing body of work that did not align with the church that could not be reconciled. They did the science, they were just subject to the demands of political power of their time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] callyral@pawb.social 1 points 4 days ago

Both have a lot of books involved

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›