this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
913 points (96.3% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

634 readers
1010 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like "liberal" and "conservative".

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as "to the left" or "to the right" of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think you need to somehow get money out of politics or these majorities will continue to be divided.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Only 69% support same sex marriage? That seems low.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I agree with every single one of those except for the taking away my guns part. The second amendment is vitally important for the exact reason of what we are going through right now: the overtaking of the US government by oppressive fascists.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I mean realistically what is you owning a gun gonna do against a drone strike or whatever other tech the military has? The only way a revolution happens in the modern day is if the military lets it. I can definitely see the value in guns for protection against paramilitary groups trying to go after people but beyond that guns aren't gonna stop the US government from doing fascist stuff if the military is on their side.

Edit: Also at a certain point if you're actively fighting and resisting against the government getting access to guns even if they are illegal isn't gonna be the biggest problem you have.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

I mean realistically what is you owning a gun gonna do against a drone strike or whatever other tech the military has?

All of that tech is reliant on logistics. People in trucks, moving stuff from where it is, to where it will be used.

With guns, that logistics network is vulnerable.

The Russians spent 10 years fighting Afghan resistance, and lost. The US spent 20 years fighting Afghan resistance, and lost. The American civilian populace is much better equipped than Afghani fighters ever were. Any forceful defeat of the American populace will require civil disarmament.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

guerilla warfare is still helped by having weapons and is probably still somewhat effective against a military that doesn't want indiscriminate slaughter of civilians.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Then why didn't they fucking vote for it?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Drop the anti-gun arguments; they aren't based on reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Such a party should have rejecting corporate/foreign/etc money as part of its platform. Also candidates should be barred from owning stock.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vvilld@50501.chat 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I appreciate and agree with the sentiment, but I think a call to form an entirely new political party demonstrates a naivety with regards to how the American political system works. It's just not going to happen. A third party will NEVER displace one of the two major parties without massive changes to the electoral system that would likely require a Constitutional Amendment.

Our system and political culture is just not structured to allow for 3rd parties. What's more, the 2 major parties have ingrained themselves into the system so much that they have MASSIVE institutional advantages over a 3rd party.

This will never be a successful effort. I think a better goal would be to co-opt and take over the Democratic Party, booting out all the Vichy collaborationists like Schumer, Jefferies, Newsom, Adams, Pelosi, etc, and remaking the party.

With a new 3rd party, best case scenario is it has 0 impact. If it does get any votes, it'll just divide the anti-fascist vote with the Democrats (and any other 3rd parties) making it even more difficult to win.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (13 children)

"Democracy will just never work, the king won't allow it"

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Manticore@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

You'd want to avoid using the word 'progressive' because it's already become a shorthand.

People will vote against things they want (ACA) over terms they hate (Obamacare).

[–] Wireproof@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If that's true why did the majority let the minority lead the way, are they dumb?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

If you just vote for the individual policies we say we want in this poll, then you're throwing your vote away!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. Americans are fucking stupid.

The RNC and GOP claim to hold every position on every stance and talk about outcomes which will never come from the policies they actually write. The American Public doesn't know jack shit about policies or vote history.

So the GOP consistently outnumber the DNC every year for over 10 years. Even when DNC pick majority leader it has been because of caucusing Independents.

You can just keep winning if you just keep lying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Me% would love it if everyone were able to attend higher education. History gets sugarcoated in grade school. Once you make it to college, you get to learn all the good stuff.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'll be real with you, in depth WWII history should be taught in high school, as well as political spectrums like dictatorships. Where I'm from, I saw images of concentration camp victims when I was 15, in class. I saw how starved they were in pictures and in videos. Saw the piles of clothes, shoes, tooth fillings, etc. Saw the camps themselves and Hitler speeches that we studied. We were presented the US anti-propaganda film, "Don't Be A Sucker" as well to home in how dangerous dictator cult speeches are.

It did affect me a lot to learn about these things and the harsh reality of human cruelty, but it was also a good lesson to ingrain in us kids. Repeating this is a worse nightmare than being educated about it. I'm always shocked when I meet Americans that got the bare minimum education on WWII with 0 understanding of the how it happened. It's actually shocking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Also, c'mon! Everyone in my community pays at least $10,000.00 a year in taxes but somehow that's not enough to patch up all the holes on the road.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure if people too lazy to vote in a primary to get progressive candidates on the ballot are going to put in the immense amount of effort to create a new political party.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›