this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1216 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66584 readers
4203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 9) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Please, let it be over. Idiotic "ai"....

[–] zoeycodes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

yeah thats crazy

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

chatgpt is stagnant, the newest model was lackluster despite using way more resources and costing a shitload of cash, Altman is floundering and on his way out he’s going to try do some lobbying bullshit

Copyright is bullshit and honestly if it disappeared it would help small creators more than anything but openai is not a small creator and guaranteed they will lobby for only huge corps like them to get such an exception. You and I will still get sued to shit by disney or whoever for daring to make $500 off of a shitty project that used some sample or something while meta and openai get free reign to steal the entirety of humanity’s creative output with no recompense

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, please.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

They are US based right?

So they literally do whatever they want anyway regardless of what any law might say.

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Are they listening to themselves?

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Many of you are completely two-faced on copyright laws.

[–] Jamdroid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As far as the ai industry has already broken copyright laws. It will not be actually intelligent for a long time. Just like crypto this seems like a global scam that has squandered resources for a dream of a free workforce. Instead of working together to try and create an ai there are lots of technology companies doing the same ineffective bull 🤔

Oh yes. Deepseek can quote from copyright sources. So can openAI models, but they are programmed not to.

Facebook trained on the torrent of Annas archive.

The copyright horse has left the stable.

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Sorry to say, but he's right. For AI to truly flourish in the West, it needs access to all previously human made information and media.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›