OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use : technology

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Please, let it be over. Idiotic "ai"....

[–] zoeycodes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

yeah thats crazy

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

chatgpt is stagnant, the newest model was lackluster despite using way more resources and costing a shitload of cash, Altman is floundering and on his way out he’s going to try do some lobbying bullshit

Copyright is bullshit and honestly if it disappeared it would help small creators more than anything but openai is not a small creator and guaranteed they will lobby for only huge corps like them to get such an exception. You and I will still get sued to shit by disney or whoever for daring to make $500 off of a shitty project that used some sample or something while meta and openai get free reign to steal the entirety of humanity’s creative output with no recompense

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, please.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

They are US based right?

So they literally do whatever they want anyway regardless of what any law might say.

[+] allo@sh.itjust.works -9 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Let's say I write a book.

If I don't want people copying it, people shouldn't be copying it. I don't care if it's been 500 years. It's my book.

This is a weird thread. Lots of people for artists losing control of their creations quickly while simultaneously against artist creations being used by others without consent. Just my perspective but why should artists lose control of their own creations at all? The problem in copyright is tech companies doing patent thickets; not artists.

Even artistic creations held by corporations. Waiting for Marvel stuff to hit public domain to publish a bunch of Marvel novels since they can't protect their creations any more? Why is that acceptable? If someone creates something and doesn't want it stolen, I don't give a fuck what the law says, stealing it is theft. The thief should instead be using Marvel stuff as inspiration as they make their own universe; not just waiting an amount of time before stealing someone else's creation without consent. It isn't holding progress back at all to make novel artistic creations instead of steal others. Art = very different from tech.

when I publish a book, to steal it is consenting to be Luigi'd; no matter how long ago it came out.

load more comments (14 replies)

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Are they listening to themselves?

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Many of you are completely two-faced on copyright laws.

[–] Jamdroid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As far as the ai industry has already broken copyright laws. It will not be actually intelligent for a long time. Just like crypto this seems like a global scam that has squandered resources for a dream of a free workforce. Instead of working together to try and create an ai there are lots of technology companies doing the same ineffective bull 🤔

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Oh yes. Deepseek can quote from copyright sources. So can openAI models, but they are programmed not to.

Facebook trained on the torrent of Annas archive.

The copyright horse has left the stable.

[+] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world -11 points 2 days ago (29 children)

I find it odd that Lemmy users are so adverse to tech.

[–] miridius@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's crazy how intense the Lemmy hive mind is about some things. It's basically a cult

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

lol, this is a human trait, not a Reddit/Twitter/Lemmy "thing".

load more comments (28 replies)

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Sorry to say, but he's right. For AI to truly flourish in the West, it needs access to all previously human made information and media.

load more comments (17 replies)

Technology

Our Rules

Approved Bots