allo

joined 1 year ago
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

thank you! hailuo has a great Character Reference ability and yesterday they added something that should allow 2 specific characters to interact in the same scene if used smartly. Should get better and better :)

0
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by allo@sh.itjust.works to c/musicproduction@sh.itjust.works
 

I've had various chats with ppl, usually nonartists, that believe all art is humans building on what humans b4 have made and nothing is truly original. Anyway, so i think nah and most of my own stuff is not from any human thing. But I am also aware of when it is, and that is what I show you today.

Like a trillion minutes in to Desert Dragon, I thought it a fitting place to do something inspired by 1:07 minutes in to dunderpatrullen's Face Against the Gardin which is an absolutely heavenly stream of notes that are less individual notes and more an undulating wave of pure harmony.

I then immediately do another inspired thing, this time from 3:54 of Ott's Jack's Cheese and Bread Snack which is like a giant string of nonsense and then suddenly a voice comes in saying "One." blah blah blah. While I used a synth instead of a voice, I was inspired by the tone and how it suddenly gives structure to the sands of everythingness.

so the part is 3:40 in Desert Dragon and it came out different than both inspirations (as inspired things should) and pretty cool imo

spoileri'm going to remix this song on my second round of releases because I started editing it more already cuz i thought the ending lame. My rules for remixing are ask me if u want to remix something and you probably can with 50%50% $ split :) you can release teh remix on your account or i can (tho i reserve the right to decline if I don't want it on my artist account). Also each round of releases I will have one slot open for remixing someone else's thing, with same rules in reverse. If interested, show me a constant tempo piece of yours you have in mind. Thank you.

 

Feel free to horrifically ban me forever since this is a video and song I personally made and thus advertising. I think it turned out great tho. Video content was made entirely with Hailuo and entirely on phone (audio made mostly on computer). The eyes are iffy on alot of clips and low definition and filled literally to the brim with slop, if you look for it, on nearly every scene. I think the storytelling is wonderful tho and feels great making vast stories.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

brb going back in time and not posting it yet then

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

her interacting with teh creature looks more natural than most greenscreen acting of movies.

9
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by allo@sh.itjust.works to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
 

My musicvid character looks slightly different than the person here so I can't use this clip. Rather share it than disappear it tho. I think it's cool how high quality and imaginative it is; a good example of ai creativity.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Can someone please make and then share an example?

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

It's fun attaching different dreams to different pages and flipping through pages to see what is pulled up. I know some people do that for religious guidance using holy books. :)

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

nice how their eyes are glowy like that

 
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

i actually wasnt called a fascist or a nazi. was weird. post feels about over and still not called fascist nor nazi. Did i do something wrong?

 
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Reminds me of when a business bans mention of it's competitors because they know their own offering is trash (rather than make something they are proud of). I think it's called Insecurity.

If the openly available China stuff is so great, make something great yourself if you want to compete with them. To instead ban it is to essentially hold americans down and reduce the quality of what they can do. So nah. Trash Trump decision. No one wants Altman as US AI posterboy. Don't force people from openly available high quality stuff on to the Altman bandwagon.

A real company should be able to mention their competitors without fear because they are proud of what they made and genuinely think it's the best and, if it isn't, they are actively improving it to the point they feel it is.

This decision basically shows US AI insecurity, there will be a shift, and that Altman can't compete with better people.

18
(sh.itjust.works)
 
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

interestingly im in the rural lands of the poorest county in my state and women here are often brawlers, physically strong, and I have heard about the same amount of men and women say they are in or worked in construction. So class (including preference for physical jobs from lack of decent education) and norms (such as being tough being cool also for women here) may also play a role.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

nice equation. Lovely seeing the 'i' just as I'm realizing how it works. thank you

 

I indirectly realized what DEI was, realized a fundamental aspect of lefty thought, and that apparently I'm not a lefty.

The story starts with Gender Neutrality. A little while ago, the Trump Administration made military testing Gender Neutral and I watched as there was tons of opposition by the lemmy lefties. So, over the last few days, I dug more in to it and, sure enough, the vast majority of lemmy lefties are viciously against Gender Neutrality. Highly for gender Equality; but highly against gender Neutrality.

I came up with various iffy reasonings, like that Gender Neutrality is a removing of gender instead of respecting chosen genders; but meh. The interesting thing is what I noticed under the surface. The main reasoning for hate against the gender neutral military tests is that it was assumed they would be passed by a larger amount of males than females. This is where I started to realize DEI. The lefty approach is to manipulate the tests so women have easier tests and males have harder tests; thus resulting in a genderbalanced military.

So, in a job, same approach. If not 'enough' minorities are in a job, manipulate the variables so that there are more.

So what is this? The lefty way to create equality? Unbalance the playing field just right so there are equal amounts of different types of people? The cost of Equality, gained in this way, is removal of Neutrality (sexual and ethnic).

Anyway, this was a fascinating realization; and I had kept hearing about DEI and suddenly deeply understand it along with the fight against it. So what is the best approach?

My initial thought is that periods of DEI alternating with periods of not DEI seems best unless the culture is high in appreciation of diversity with a norm of naturally bringing in diverse types of people. The reason for alternating times of DEI and not DEI is so that the norm of diversity can be created through DEI, and then, through a period of notDEI, evolution can occur naturally without artificial forces. It's like training wheels. Without change, some people are blocked from where they want to be. So DEI it up to allow them to be where was previously blocked to them. But remove DEI every once in a while and see if that "norm of naturally bringing in diverse types of people" has arisen yet. If it has, the training wheels are no longer needed; because the goal is not to forever force people to 'do the right thing', but to have a culture where the norm is to naturally do it themselves.

Anyway, I naturally prefer Neutrality, which I realize now blocks the lefty ability to create Equality. Really is fascinating. Thoughts?

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

if you cant understand the question, too bad. I would direct you to terraborra's response as a decent answer at least. Maybe you can learn from it.

 

treatment of people independent of gender

I had, for some reason, associated the Left with the concept of 'Gender Neutrality'. Multiple recent experiences have shown me this was a faulty assumption. It became most clear with the massive negative feedback I got when questioning why, in 'killed even the women and children', it is still in modern day considered worse to kill a woman than a man. But there was a hint the Left is not actually associated with gender neutrality right before when the Trump administration had made military testing Gender Neutral (same test for everyone independent of gender). I was surprised that decision came from the Right and also surprised the massive opposition was by lefty lemmys.

I know some species of birds have the genders become very different from each other and some, like Vultures, have females and males that are nearly indistinguishable. It, after-the-fact, makes sense to me that Gender Neutrality (treatment of people independent of gender) is potentially a different thing from the 'Gender Rights' fought for by the Left. Anyway, so I have been awoken recently to Gender Neutrality not actually being of the Left, acceptable to the Right, and I am most curious in which ideology 'Gender Neutrality' is the accepted 'correct' view. So

Which ideology is associated with "Gender Neutrality"?

edit: I do now see how Gender Neutrality is the removal of gender distinctions whereas the ideal of the Left is chooseable gender distinctions.

 

I thought this silly. Banned for violating rule 1 (sexism, descrimination, etc). Literally laughing irl right now since my post was specifically antidiscrimination.

no idea lol

 
 

since alot of the trekking happens on planets

14
(sh.itjust.works)
 
view more: next ›