this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1082 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Found this notification this morning on my pixel 6.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomasEkeli@programming.dev 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Fennec is great on Android

Great app also maintained by Mozilla

(wait, don't tell me y'all don't know lol)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 68 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's a regular notification, which would happen for any application whose data policy is changed on the Play Store page. These policy are as declared by the app publisher. This would be the same for any application that didn't check that "sharing data with third party" box earlier, then checked it later on.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get what your comment is getting at. I don't view this post as saying anything special or unique about the notification. I see it as a warning that Firefox is now doing this.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Have you read all the other replies? "Google mad", "Google putting Firefox in the dirt", "False info", etc.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

I interpret top level comments as responses to OP unless they say something otherwise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Firefox engines have telemetry since old ages. Do you know what even crazier ??? even other firefox browser like fennec has Mozilla telemetry.


PSA : disable it with Blocker (ROOT) for more privacy

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Friendship ended with Firefox. Waterfox is my new best friend ❤️

[–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Pot Calling Kettle... etc... 🤣

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (13 children)

I know, right, the fucking balls of Google to fucking say this

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] devedeset@lemm.ee 75 points 1 day ago (12 children)

As of the latest Chrome update on PC, they have dropped support for uBlock. You can still technically enable it, but they disabled it by default once you update.

That got me back to Firefox with breakneck speed.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] betternotbigger@lemmy.world 419 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Even if this isn't entirely true, you know Google wouldn't pass up the opportunity to reduce Firefox market share to scare everyone back to Chrome.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There's no need to reduce Firefox marketshare. Most people don't even consider using anything else than whatever is default in their device.

Also, it's not a Google scare tactic or a flex. Every application on the Play Store must disclose the general outlines of their data policy, including the sharing of data. Lying with those checkbox is not a good idea but they are completely informative and put there by the publishing party, so the people responsible for publishing Firefox on mobile just updated these, and this is what is shown when an app publisher say their app is sharing data with third parties.

tl;dr: it's very likely that not a single soul at Google even looked at this, as this is just the regular behavior of the Play Store with apps that changes their data policy or indicate sharing user data with third parties.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why the dichotomy between the chrome listing on the store then?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

No idea, I'm not that obsessed with it. But do note that "The developers of these apps provided info about their data sharing practices to an app store. They may update it over time." and "Data sharing practices may vary based on your app version, use, region, and age."

The recent changes to Firefox terms of use (well, their introduction really) was supposedly meant to appease some regional lawmakers. Maybe it is a regional thing. Maybe they changed it again. Maybe it's, as often with store page update, rolled out progressively to people (in either direction, whether it's adding or removing these terms).

The point is, that's neither a "Google" operation to put Firefox in a bad light, nor a Mozilla operation to… do whatever it is they're doing these days. It's just a regular message. Which, reading a lot of the replies here, is something that have to be said.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Firefox? You mean the company they give several hundred million dollars/year? Yeah I don't think they're too worried. They need some number of users on Firefox to prevent anti-trust issues. Which they're on the brink of right now.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Like chrome does something different?

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It integrates into the Google ecosystem well, and if that has value to a person it may just be enough to bring them back to chrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, chrome is doing something different. It is even worse!

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's not the point they're trying to make I think. It's more of an attack on perfection. Like "the alternative is not perfect either so why not just stay with Chrome". It's not a very strong argument in general but it might be enough to keep people from switching.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 23 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (7 children)

So if Mozilla wants to monetize location data, what does this mean for all the custom ROMs that use Mozilla's location provider instead of Google's?

This might mean that we would have no true free location provider left.

Edit: just was thinking, what does this mean for Firefox forks that also use Mozilla's location service?

[–] Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

So if Mozilla wants to monetize location data, what does this mean for all the custom ROMs that use Mozilla's location provider instead of Google's?

Nothing, because they dont sell location data, this just seems like a routine warning that pops up when ToS and Privacy policy changes, and since they have clarified their position on this matter, (not to mention the lack of alternative FOSS web engines). We really shouldn't let this bother us

Of course i might be wrong and it may come out that Mozilla has turned heel(lot of heel turning happening lately)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 157 points 1 day ago (5 children)

God damn why's the world so shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

FWIW I'm not seeing this on the Play Store for Firefox 136.0.1 on my Pixel 8a, and I'm not seeing any warnings on Beta or Nightly either:

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›