this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
619 points (98.6% liked)

Boycott US

533 readers
715 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to get rid of citizen's united and implement independent district drawing and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@sopuli.xyz

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 60 points 2 days ago (19 children)

"illegally and collusively boycott". Trump is such a turd of emotions. Just says things that feel true, and his idiot followers gobble it up. I don't think there's any case where a boycott is illegal, and colluding is just a scarier word for organizing or cooperating.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

colluding is just a scarier word for organizing or cooperating.

Makes sense when you remember that he doesn't want people cooperating, that's communism ~/s~ . He wants people obeying.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The only reason Trump knows what the word colluding means is because of his collusion with Russia.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

I don’t think there’s any case where a boycott is illegal,

The USA has made boycotting the zionist entity illegal, many states require businesses to sign pledges not to boycott as conditions to getting contracts. So much for that "freedum of speech".

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

I wonder whatever happened with Musk's claims that companies not advertising on Xitter was illegal collusion.

A quick Qwant search later: it seems he's expanded the suit: https://www.npr.org/2025/02/01/nx-s1-5283271/elon-musk-lawsuit-advertisers-boycott-new

Unfortunately, his abuse has already SLAPPed down the original group behind the assessment that led to the boycott, but now that the world's bestest genius evar has decided to also take on (check article) Lego, Nestlé, Tyson Foods, Abbott Laboratories, Colgate-Palmolive, Pinterest and Shell International?

Hopefully, he's bitten off more than he can chew.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

When you know the truth about Tesla, the term "Elon's baby" makes him sound the world first "car cuck".

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TIL it's illegal to not buy a Tesla.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, straight to jail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is a car ad for every car except Teslas. Maybe it's an ad for bikes too.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

This is the shit that really bugs me with Trump in office again. He is the leader of the executive branch and just throws out statements saying boycotting is illegal.

His words should matter and the office should matter but it’s all just reality TV horseshit.

I’m sick of it.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am sure the republican "silent majority" will save tesla!

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Guarantee that Trump did not drop even $40k of his "billions" to help save Tesla.

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tesla being down 30% since last month. Keep it up!

No-no-no. Keep it down. Even "downer" :)

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Lmao on these whiny ass babies. Fuck Tesla, if people don't want to buy them, you can't stop them.

Soon to be added to government employment applications.....how many tesla do you own and if accepting the job, would you qualify for financing for a tesla?

[–] kwr112233@feddit.dk 28 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It is working. Keep boycotting US everyone!

(Americans we still love most of you as individuals, its just .. the threats and backstabbing by your leader is a bit much)

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 17 points 2 days ago

Totally understand. Keep the boycotts running. We'll keep doing what we can from here. This isn't just about the US, it never was. Until we bury ALL the fascists, it's gonna be a little hectic around this 3rd stone from the Sun. Stay strong, perseverance furthers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] madjo 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how his "rolling coal" idiot followers are going to love getting a tesla to pwn the libs.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Implies they're capable of independent thought whilst wacking off to their king's every word.

They'll just fall in line with the narrative.

[–] yarr 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While it's true that Elon Musk was being criticized by some for various reasons, the fact remains that Donald Trump's decision to buy a Tesla car as a response to criticism is more of a publicity stunt than an actual attempt to address the concerns.

To put this into perspective, let's look at the net worth of Donald Trump. According to Forbes' 2022 estimates, Trump's net worth is approximately $3.2 billion. Now, compare that to the price tag of a Tesla Model S, which can cost anywhere from $80,000 to over $100,000, depending on the trim level and options.

In this context, buying one Tesla car represents only a tiny fraction of Trump's overall net worth. For instance, if we assume he bought a base model Tesla at $80,000, that would account for less than 0.0025% of his estimated net worth.

So, why the fuss? This purchase seems more like a symbolic gesture to appease his critics and demonstrate his wealth rather than an actual demonstration of his commitment to environmental causes or technological innovation. It's likely that Trump was trying to show off his supposed "status symbol" and "rich person problems," which has become a hallmark of his brand.

This is like a buddy helping out another buddy by giving him the change he found in his couch. It's sad that people will fall for this type of hollow gesture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rmic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This can't be true. It's a fake, right ?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

nope, it's real.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago

Of course, the guy knows the word "collusively":

secretly acting together for a fraudulent or illegal purpose

It's like the word was made for him...

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't worry, dumpy will divert federal funds to some other elon owned business under the guise of removing corruption and cronyism.

Most likely i'd say spacex/starlink related, since there are few that can compete in private space in terms of us companies right now. hundreds of billions can easily be sunk into anything aerospace related.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hope he drives it and the brakes fail as the steering wheel falls off.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It would be a truly funny timeline if the self driving managed to kill both Trump and Musk

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

In a show of support for Elon Musk, a truly great ~~South African~~ American

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›