this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
94 points (90.5% liked)

Fairvote Canada

251 readers
186 users here now

What is This Group is About?/De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?

The unofficial Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.

Le mouvement non officiel de Lemmy visant à amener la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.


Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles


We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.

Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 minutes ago

i am from a country with compulsory voting. it doesnt make all that much difference.

[–] SydneyJim@body.social 3 points 1 hour ago

@Sunshine @WIREID91LDNON It’s is illegal for adults in Australia to not vote. Fines apply for not voting in any state or federal election.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

It's very easy to vote here, where I am. The stations are plentiful, usually staffed by cheerful people, and the process is quick and easy.

Give us $100 off our taxes each year if we voted (a coupon you get when you put the ballot in the box) and we'll see crazy amounts of participation.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Voting should be compulsory too. BUT it should be made as easy, unobstusive, and convenient as absolutely possible to do so, AND the option to not vote for any given office or the whole ballot must be available too (though you are still required to specifically opt out). This makes people far more likely to vote, incentivizes helping that happen but still allows for apathetic/protesting/undecided voters to better represent their desires.

Compulsory voting is not incompatible with proportional, instant runoff, or approval voting. You can do both.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 12 hours ago

Both. Both are the way to go.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 18 points 12 hours ago

Por que no los dos?

[–] BJHanssen@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Have been saying for years; compulsory vote with default NOTA option, make a non-vote actually count for something. Tricky part will be figuring out what it should count for. Personally I would want it to be disqualifying for anyone who loses to it.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Having compulsory voting would already improve results from fptp. Proportional voting would make it perfect.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

More perfect: an informed electorate

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, good luck with that.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

We have mandatory voting here in Flanders and people still overwhelmingly vote far-right demagogues into office...