this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

327 readers
5 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who cares what the gulf is called ... keep pushing the government on other more important issues.

The goal of the whole renaming stupidity is distraction and deflection ... keep everyone occupied and angry over stupid meaningless things while you go somewhere and do shit you don't want people talking about.

Journalists should just ignore the whole gulf idiocy and move on to talking about real important things like what the hell is an unelected billionaire doing in running government.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. This is distraction central. Plus, administration access only gives reporters more bullshit these days. Sitting in a Musk Administration ministry of propaganda gathering is not a prestige position.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

My problem is, while its a distraction, its also a way to test the firet amendment

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

i hope the ap keeps pushing the button here. it's a pretty lame hill for lord diaper to die on, but fuck him. he chose it.

i've been calling him the 'wrong' name for years. it's free speech, mr asshole-who-thinks-he's-in-charge.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to wonder if this is a “silly” way for them to test powers of censorship and media/reality manipulation. This can be written off as “trivial,” or what have you, but scary changes happen in small increments.

[–] Fermion 2 points 1 week ago

The 'trivial' part is intentional and has to do with conditioning this admin's supporters. There's a clear pattern of trying to make opposition "cry wolf" on issues that the republican base either agrees with the party on, or ideally dismiss as being entirely unimportant. It's important (to them) for the MAGA base to not only distrust, but revile sources of information that don't tow the line.

So the left sees this issue as a blatant erosion of 1st amendment rights and the right sees a stupid hissy fit about the name of a body of water most of them will never see. When both sides aren't even close to agreeing whether there even is a problem, they definitely won't band together to stop the overreach in power.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

I can just see the Toddler-in-chief balling up his tiny little fists and stamping his tiny little feet and shouting, "Can SO!"