this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

912 readers
327 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social
11
The Privacy Spectrum (sambent.com)
submitted 1 month ago by butternuts@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I came across this neat interactive spectrum on privacy. A decent insight into the depths you can go to achieve your privacy goals with examples.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All I get is a static page. Wonder what privacy-violating scripts they're running.

[–] butternuts@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe you have JavaScript disabled?

uBlock is not reporting anything weird and the network tab resources for the browser's dev tools show nothing suspicious. Combing over the JavaScript sources with the dev tools also show no privacy concerns on fingerprinting.

The posted link is using a FOSS project called markmap (https://github.com/markmap/markmap?tab=readme-ov-file) and the project looks solid from what skimming I did.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah its some dumb line interactive line graph would be better as a static html info page. But also its a dumb graph overall

[–] butternuts@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Saying something is "dumb" is too nebulous to derive any meaning. Could you elaborate more? If you have the technical chops/insight to provide critique or even alternative recommendations then that could really help to etify the community. These kinds of convos are great for understanding privacy better.

Edit: all bark and no bite. How unfortunate as I was hoping to learn something.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's a lot of words coming from Kowalski! 😁

Now where's the dynamite?

[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I'm partially onymous. should increase my privacy a little more, i'm being very, very risky.