The market share plot looks suspiciously clean, where are those numbers from?
Edit: looks like they're from page view data. I know I spoof my browser to show chrome for better compatibility, I wonder how common that is among Firefox users.
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
The market share plot looks suspiciously clean, where are those numbers from?
Edit: looks like they're from page view data. I know I spoof my browser to show chrome for better compatibility, I wonder how common that is among Firefox users.
Do you use this extension? it allows you to do that on a site-by-site basis. Maybe only do it for sites with compatibility issues? You can report them right from the extension.
I spoof my browser (Librewolf) as Firefox for privacy and I don't encounter issues from not reporting my user agent as Chrome/Chromium. I think it's pretty uncommon for a website to not work on Firefox, so I don't see how this is necessary. The Chrome Mask extension is meant to be used on a per-site basis.
Also, I was curious if users were going down or if chrome was growing faster. Looks like it is going down, but not as much as the market share would suggest.
The recently former CEO, Mitchell Baker, made almost 7 million! It had increased exponentially in recent years
Probably not a coincidence that the share plummets around the same time as the smartphone explosion.
I’d be curious to see just desktop browsers, to see how much there’s really an exodus of Firefox users vs. new devices being added that restrict third-party browsers.
Also salary should be inflation-adjusted.
Neither probably changes the graph too much though.
Right, Firefox has the same situation with Chrome on mobile, as it had with Internet Explorer in Desktop.
I mean the graph starts in 09, and Chrome launched in 08. I assume that did more to them, but both were probably notable.
What happened in 2010?
Google released the stable version of Chrome, and funneled significant resources into marketing it. This was the first stage of their strategy - they focused on firstly making a good product, and the squeeze on users only came later (and is probably only just starting in the scheme of things).
Can we get these graphs for duckduckgo superimposed on this one?
I now recommended https://apps.gnome.org/Epiphany/
Or ladybird browser when it is released.
Lowest position pays 2M roubles a month?! Are they selling cocaine?!
ad-free cocaine, yeah.
He is obviously way too highly paid by an insane amount, but where are these people going? There's no way they're all going to Chrome, right?
Chrome, Safari, Edge (which is chromium anyways).
According to this 3x as many people use Opera over Firefox when it comes to phone usage worldwide. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/worldwide
If this inclusive to all the forks? Alot of folks run forks cus they don't like both ff and chrome. Just sayin.
Total 2022 pay: $6,903,089
Total 2023 pay: $6,260,072 - a $643,017 decrease
Base chair pay: $600,000
2023 chair bonuses and other incentives: $5,622,600
Sources:
For comparison, here are other executive salaries ($0 bonuses for each)
Executive name | Title | Total Pay (2023) |
---|---|---|
MARK SURMAN | PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR | 715,143 |
J. BOB ALOTTA | SVP, GLOBAL PROGRAMS | 508,138 |
ANGELA PLOHMAN | COO, SECRETARY & TREASURER | 452,234 |
ASHLEY BOYD | SVP, GLOBAL ADVOCACY | 427,701 |
ZHILUN PANG | DIRECTOR OF FINANCE | 273,069 |
DAVID WALKER | SENIOR COUNSEL | 268,565 |
LAINIE DECOURSY | DIRECTOR, ORG EFFECTIVENESS | 267,028 |
JUAN BARANI | SENIOR DIRECTOR, GIFT PLANNING | 262,879 |
STEPHANIE WRIGHT | SR PROGRAM MANAGER, MOZFEST | 236,785 |
I don't like that your graph key indicates the pay line is in $US millions then the axis is in millions not units. Indicating that the values are in millions of millions which seems unlikely