this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
46 points (96.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

1725 readers
357 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is no one factor that causes autism — or explains its growing prevalence. Researchers are seeking explanations for the surge. Here are some possibilities.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 55 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Always important to consider an improvement in detection

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From TFA:

They attribute most of the surge to increased awareness of the disorder and changes in how it is classified by medical professionals.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

That's important

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

I’ve seen so many depictions of historical figures that I’ve been like “yep, they’re on the spectrum” that I can’t doubt this.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

And a reduction of the stigma associated with medical disorders in general. JFK had a sister with learning disability and mild disagreeableness, which they treated by cutting out part of her brain, leaving her requiring lifelong care. They sent her away and pretended she didn't exist.

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Also worth noting that people tend to refer to autism as if it's a singular set of phenotypes, when really there's a bunch of ways that autism can manifest; hence autism spectrum disorder.

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

Better testing, and people are getting their kids tested more instead of beating the fuck out of them until they "behave" might have something to do with it.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The typical human has the same amount of plastic in their brain as there is in a credit card as a result of the relatively newly ubiquitous presence of plastic nanoparticles in our environment.

Frankly I'd be shocked if jamming a credit card into a human brain wouldn't cause some measurable difference to how the brain operates.

Edit: I guess the specific reference of a credit card is still undergoing peer review! There are many published papers showing polystyrene in the frontal cortex, though.

[–] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

That is figuratively no, the amount. I do think microplastics are probably the new lead and asbestos. Future generations will be like: “WTF, how did they ignore that”.

[–] CreatingMachines@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

I've heard this too, but I have only seen news articles about this...are there any other sources that confirm this, say, like a research paper or a fact-check group?

[–] 8baanknexer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That link says we don't EAT that much plastic per week.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/21/microplastics-brain-pollution-health

This is saying that our brains are at this point 0.5% plastic by weight.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Lots of plastics in carpet and furniture. Wouldn’t be difficult for them to be disturbed and enter the nose

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Wow what a fuckin surprise, thankfully this came before the next US admin takes office. I’m sure RFK Jr will adjust his informed stance any day now…..

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Natural selection?