this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
350 points (100.0% liked)

Nonsense

0 readers
1 users here now

funny, silly, whatevs.

Rules

keep it comedic

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lighttrails@sh.itjust.works 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Wait til you find out about corn

[–] degen@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jesus, I need my eyes checked. And my mind. I did not read it as "corn" at first glance.

[–] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I read it as com at first.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Mental keming

[–] mcz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

One word: brassica. Ok, two: brassica oleracea

[–] TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You can also boil them, mash them or stick them in a stew.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sorry what are we talking about? Can you say it again, very slowly, and enunciate carefully?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Pro...bate...hoes

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Don’t forget making homemade grenade launchers with them.

[–] mossberg590@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Corn has entered the chat....

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I just wish it were nutritionally any good for us.

Corn is:

  • Liquid Sugar Replacement (worse than sugar)
  • Starch (higher calorie, difficult to digest)
  • Cattle Feed (they also can't digest it, leading to gut rott)
  • Fuel (can't eat fuel)

But I can down several bags of Frito Lays Cornchips. Honey BBQ Twists are the bomb. If they sold those in family or party size I'd probably have fatty liver disease.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

(worse than sugar)

Eh, that's not settled science. It's terribly complex and we don't really know.

There's some research that seems to suggest all sugars are really bad for you, even those from fruits.

I'm any case, any added sugar is for sure bad for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Yep basically no nutritional value besides providing glucose. It’s why people in South America whose diet has been mostly corn and corn based products are super short.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] odium@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

And onions. The trifecta of going in everything.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago
[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Making vodka from potatoes (instead of grain) was so awesome that the woman who did it became the first female university professor in Sweden.

Edit: no it wasn't Martha Stewart you fucking idiot

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Potato is not a vegetable.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the definition of vegetable is very vague. anything from a plant can be vegetable.

i personally prefer using words like root, leaves, fruits and nuts, but strawberries put that to the test

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Anything from a plant can be a vegetable

Is bread a vegetable because it is made of wheat?

Edit: you can downvote me but you're still incorrect. It isn't vague and potato is objectively not a vegetable. Same goes for grains like wheat, corn, and rice.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're also dumb and wrong from the very loose culinary definition btw, potatoes aren't a grain, they fall under the "root VEGETABLE" category along with beets, carrots, onions etc...

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Never did I claim that a potato is a grain. Culinarily, I am correct.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

So you might be arguing with the wrong person if you want to pull culinary technicalities. When I open my copy of Escoffier Le Guide Culinaire to page 498 I find Potatoes listed in the vegetables section

But wait, let me check my copy of Jaques Pepins Complete Techniques ah, okay, on page 323 he describes potatoes as "a versatile vegetable". Maybe The Joy of Cooking? Ah, here, on page 245, under vegetables, and a root vegetable puree recipe featuring potatoes. Fascinating...

I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the CIA textbook currently though I'm fixing that soon, and my Japanese cooking technique textbooks don't specifically categorize potatoes. Want me to get back to you when I can borrow a copy of Modernist Cuisine from my chef friend?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Mf busted out the hard copy sources from the culinary greats. I'm dead.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Enjoy eating a baked potato and thinking you've had your serving of veggies for the day.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Oh, are we moving the goalposts to nutrition? Because here's some info about STARCHY VS NON-STARCHY VEGETABLES https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/starchy-vs-non-starchy-vegetables#definition

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even the meme in the OP is about nutrition and is being tongue in cheek by stretching the definition of vegetable to potatoes. That's literally the joke...

My comment on the OP was addressing nutrition, obviously.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, famed nutritionist Martha Stewart 🤡

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I am curious what your define it as, because you've ruled out vegetable and grain.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetable

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vegetable

a usually herbaceous plant (such as the cabbage, bean, or potato) grown for an edible part that is usually eaten as part of a meal

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Tell that to the National Potato Council. Potatoes may take the place of grains in some dishes, but that doesn't make them a grain. Radishes, beets, turnips, and other tubers may also be used as a starchy base for a dish, but I doubt you'd question the legitimacy of them as vegetables

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just curious, what would you define as a vegetable?

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Culinarily, you can define vegetables using the basic food groups. Grains and starches are a distinct group and not part of the vegetable food group, despite the fact that they come from plants. It is easy to see that not all food that is plant-based is, culinarily, a "vegetable" when you consider things like fruits and nuts, which people have no trouble distinguishing from vegetables.

And yes, many things we culinarily consider vegetables actually fall under the scientific definition of fruit, and some "fruits" do not fall under that definition.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Starches are just something a vegetable has, though, not something they are. Like protein and fiber.

If you exclude anything with starch from being vegetables, you're also excluding beans, squash, lentils, carrots, peas, parsnips, corn, etc.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Corn is not a vegetable, it is grain. Is rice a vegetable? No.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I think the distinction you're thinking of is when something is milled. Wheat is milled into flour. Rice is milled to remove the husks. Corn is milled into meal. At that point you're not eating the plant, you're eating a processed plant product. Of those three, corn is the only one that can really be eaten as-is, so perhaps the distinction of when it's a grain or a vegetable is more about if it was dried and milled first.

But all of that seems unrelated to potatoes, which are roots. You can make bread out of potatoes, and I don't think anyone would try to argue that potato bread somehow counts as a vegetable. But a potato on its own, minimally processed and eaten relatively whole, seems to fit the definition of a vegetable by most definitions, culinary or otherwise.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Doesn't work as well after they're dead.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Even if i consider potatoes vegetables, i wouldnt consider vodka a vegetable because its made out of potatoes

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Strong Principal Skinner meme vibes.

"Am I wrong about potatos?

...no, it's Wikipedia, Britannica, Merriam-Webster, and basically everyone on reddit that's wrong!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mcz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Of course it's a fruit, the apple of earth

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 3 points 6 months ago

Cassava/manioc/yuca: I'm you, but better.

load more comments
view more: next ›