this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8751 readers
624 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
101
Russian Losses as of July 16th, 2023 (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago by Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As listed by The Kyiv Independent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean that'd definitely make the most sense since some estimates put their KIA around 50k +/- some tens of thousands giving us a wounded:killed ratio of around 4:1, but many sources quoting that figure specifically say it's KIA and seems like that idea has stuck with some folks.

I think the problem is that people who haven't been in the military or aren't military history nerds might not understand what "casualty" means and assume it's the same as "killed", when it's wounded/incapacitated + killed

edit: more on that ~50k KIA figure here https://en.zona.media/article/2023/07/10/stats