this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
295 points (99.3% liked)

196

16822 readers
594 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Liberals will disappoint you.

Conservatives will arrest, surpress and kill you.

Clearly both are equally bad!!

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So those college students peacefully protesting aren't being arrested and suppressed while a Democrat is the president in states ran by democrats?

Found the Biden dick riding neo lib

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago

Not to forget: Cop City is a bipartisan project (and the Atlanta mayor is a dem)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Both parties in the US are liberal.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They used to be, but the current Republican party explicitly rejects liberalism. They don't follow any liberal ideas, even on capitalism and free markets. They're willing to bend any principle for power. They're fascists.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look up "liberalism", before you ridicule yourself in front of everyone.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise." How the fuck does that describe the GOP?? I mean yeah I get the argument relative to economics, but on the civil rights side of things no.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They do advocate for all of these things for white christians.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah... Liberals can be racists, you know?

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh I completely agree with you, I'm a more libertarian kind of socialist myself so I definitely don't think liberalism is the answer. I also think that's is disingenuous, and really discrediting to leftists as a whole, when people try to say that the GOP is liberal. They're definitely not; on almost any social issue they are firmly opposed to the liberal position on civil rights, freedom of association, etc etc.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, they did turn into fascists in the last few decades... As liberals tend to do.

But yeah, I was a bit facecious with someone who probably didn't really know their politics too well. You got me.

Username checks out, btw. 🖤❤️

Solidarity forever! 🌹

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's disingenuous to leftists to call liberals leftist. Liberals are right wing and always have been.

I didn't mean to imply that liberals are leftists, but rather that the GOP isn't liberal other than economically.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, [consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.

Wikipedia agrees with me

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's a United States thing. They use the term liberal to refer to social liberalism whereas you're referring to neoliberalism.

Edit: On second glance, your Wikipedia link is to straight liberalism, which includes things the Republican party doesn't support, like secularism. So who knows.

[–] 01101000_01101001@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Originally, america was secular. Then the 1950s happened.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

which includes things the Republican party doesn't support, like secularism.

Yeah, saw that, too. They are still liberals (as in: support neoliberal policies), but with christo-fascist tendencies. The article states that these points are contended right dow, though.

[–] antidote101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Relative to much of the world yes.

In terms of economics and neoliberalism mostly.

You're more right than wrong.

In terms of social liberalism, the differences between the two parties are more noticeable.

This is because structural politics is defined by undemocratic means, interests, and forces.

So we vote on more superficial aspects, such as the culture war and social rights.

Which can be important, but most of the time aren't the real meat of the world's problems.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

The Log party and the Heron party.

Two-party systems were a problem even in ancient Greece.