this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
386 points (96.2% liked)

Firefox

20384 readers
140 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is, it didn't. Tabs do not take memory space unless you actively interact with them in Firefox.

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet since switching to firefox last year I've had more problems with FF eating memory and the browser slowing down, than I ever with Chrome. (not that I'm switching back)

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting Though Chrome is much less of a RAM-hopper nowadays either.

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. It's pretty good in that regard. It usually hogs a bit, but it's very good at releasing it if it's needed elsewhere. FF though, not so much.