Green Energy

2469 readers

390 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

poVoq@slrpnk.net

112

Rooftop solar panels are flooding California’s grid. That’s a problem. As electricity prices go negative, the Golden State is struggling to offload a glut of solar power (wapo.st)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'll note that right now, this is a seasonal issue, associated with moderate springtime temperatures when there is a lot of sunshine available.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm hoping to one day install some solar, and looking forward to setting up non-battery "storage"

e.g., electric water heater that turns on when there's an excess of power, deep freezer that gets as cold as possible when there's excess power, that sort of thing. It seems thermodynamics is the relevant discipline for these sorts of "storage" methods :)

As an aside

while smart devices are much maligned, some rudimentary smart features for matching consumption seems like a pretty good idea. (If I ever get around to this stuff it'll be local control via HomeAssistant.)

[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Im a fan of gravity based energy storage. Excess energy is used to raise a weight up a slope and it can be reclaimed when the weight is released.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

There is a reason why energy based energy storage is not more developed right now (with the exception of Pumped-storage hydroelectricity). It's not very dense at all.

A 15 tons block of concrete that goes up 100m can only store 4kwh of energy. A 4.5kwh battery cost around 1600€.

Gravity based energy storage seem simple and elegant at first but you go into the details you realized that is far far les efficient than regular chemical battery. Unfortunately.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Absolutely! Living in a city, this gets a bit tricky though. But if I had a giant reservoir on a hill...and another one below it...

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would you convert electricity into thermal work then back again? Why not consider old school batteries? You're already taking up space and infrastructure

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I have no intention of converting that back to electricity. The goal would essentially be to maximize usage during times of cheap/marginally free energy.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Ah, that makes sense.