this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
440 points (99.5% liked)

Gaming

22275 readers
30 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Literally victim blaming. Classy.

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Blaming the player goes a bit far, true.

That said, the sad truth is that companies only react when it affects their bottom line.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago

Well, there's the other route. If they are forced legally to comply, which is what Ross is trying to get done, and is the far better option alongside being more expensive and difficult, because a company's reaction to finances can be reversed as soon as it doesn't matter or the public forgets.

[–] jyoskykid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is general knowledge that these companies do this. FSF has campaigned a lot against DRM, under the name Defective by Design.

When someone makes a contract with the devil and complains when it affects them, pointing it out is not victim blaming.