this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
1528 points (100.0% liked)

196

16822 readers
616 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@sh.itjust.works
1528
Trump bible (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HumanPenguin@lemmy.cafe 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Its def a way around church funding. But a legal one. So the use of laundering weakens the complaint.

The only potential legal question. Is are churches buying the bible or openly encouraging memembers to. And let's be honest. That tax dodge is totally ignored by the IRS for so long. I can see it getting challenged as unequal application of law. Unless the IRS dose some major attack on most churches.

Edit; odd autocorrect. Nuking vs buying.