this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1490 points (100.0% liked)
196
18049 readers
974 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
voting is not harm reduction
i see a lotta people saying that with not a lotta evidence.
i challenge you to tell that to an LGBT person facing a growing wave of anti transgender bills
perhaps try arguing that to the women and medical professionals who fear legal action for what used to be standard medical procedure resulting from the overturning of Roe v Wade.
tell that to Gazans who are undergoing forced starvation with genocidal intent, a process that one of the presidential candidates has vowed to “finish.”
sure, maybe voting isn’t harm reduction. but it seems capable of reducing at least a little bit of harm so…
harm reduction has a specific meaning. voting for fascist politicians isn't harm reduction whether they are red or blue.
Have you considered that fascism is a spectrum that starts at colonialism (genocide Joe) and ends at dismantling democracy at home (Trump)? Ask yourself who is served by ignoring this nuance. Hint: it isn't the working class.
I disagree that the nuance is meaningful, or that ignoring it doesn't serve the working class
so don’t vote for fascist politicians then.
genuinely what is your goal for this conversation? that i tell people it’s in their and their loved ones’ best interest to sit this election out?
i for real don’t get the motive of this talking point except to sow complacency, and complacency has given life to fascism pretty darn effectively in recent history.
my goal is that you would stop misinforming people about what harm reduction is.
okay
It is when not voting risks harming people
https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
"I'm punishing the system by not voting" is still working within the system.
no one said they were punishing the system by not voting
This article is such an interesting case given that it somehow has achieved nearing 100% SEO coverage for “voting harm reduction” on all search engines since its publication and my first reading of it in February 2020. I don’t know why that is. While I do appreciate the dedication and values that go into it, unfortunately I find the output of this organization in general to be exceptionally and painfully polemical such that the arguments put forward are incredibly hard to find compelling. I don’t expect anyone to adopt my opinion on this; this is only my personal perspective.
That said, I do want to share this article by an Indigenous legal scholar, Ashley Courchene, which tends to be more balanced in my view: https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/monitor/election-2019-moving-beyond-“-vote-or-not-vote”
I'll try to finish it this week.