this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
737 points (98.4% liked)

Futurology

2545 readers
118 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let me guess, the stem cells are harvested from pigs?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Presumably they culture more, but obviously the first cells would have had to. Some of these companies have been very particular about sourcing their starting cells non-lethally from sanctuary animals or whatever, because why not.

[–] Zerthax@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you only have to do it once (or a few times) and can use it repeatedly ad infinitum, you can be just about as discerning as you want.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Generally stem cell cultures these days are sourced once then replicated forever.

[–] emmanuel_car@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s pretty incredible, with no noticeable degradation between replications? I know very little about stem cell cultures.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’d have to be some degradation over time. Unless they’re repairing the DNA using computerized backups or something.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

The stem cells themselves are self-repairing and self replicating. Quoting Wikipedia:

Due to the self-renewal capacity of stem cells, a stem cell line can be cultured in vitro indefinitely.

Currently all embryonic stem cell research and therapies in the US are conducted using only 486 cultures.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Likely, but stem cell harvesting is not as horrible for pigs and doesn't require thousands of them either. It's certainly a massive improvement.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's kinda the point‽