this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3418 points (99.9% liked)

196

16822 readers
585 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sic_1@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

True but the emissions saved if everyone copied in with the proposed actions dwarf in comparison with the emissions saved if those 100 corporations did the same.

So what is easier to do? Change the lifestyles and circumstances of billions of people in every country in the world within half a decade or so the same with large companies?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do it all. Every bit counts. Companies suck. Boycott the ones who don't help.

[–] sic_1@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

On that we can agree. But most of the activist effort should go into stopping the companies' emissions, not into infighting.

[–] Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We are well past the "what is easier to do" point and need to grasp for every straw there is though.

[–] sic_1@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

But the efforts done are more akin to everyday people infighting about stuff that would amount to 5% saved on the expense of pushing against the real culprits. The planet's resources are limited but so is people's attention span. Better focus the efforts proportionally on emitting sectors.