The best part is it was just copied from another site, at least it was cited. I sent to the site and it said the article is based on an article from another source.

Here's the true source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06633-0.pdf

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you know if you didn't click

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because I’ve clicked on it many times before and it is wicked toxic.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 2 points 1 year ago

I see wired and my immidiate thought is, whatever the article is, it's not worth it.

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

and isn't GDPR compliant.