this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
90 points (100.0% liked)

196

16822 readers
1249 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] javasux@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then the average person is going to have a much harder time attributing proficiency to either of those factors, and it's much more appropriate to just compliment their hard work and dedication.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it acknowledges something someone worked for rather than something they were born with.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think work is separable from a person's circumstances of birth? Lots of things influence a person's ability to work, chiefly how much money they were born into, but also some people are born with certain abilities that make them more capable of doing work.

Do you think work is more valuable because it somehow comes from a person's character? Is character separable from birth?

And also, what about someone who worked as hard as they could and could only ever achieve a middling career in their chosen field? Do you put their apparent failure down to simply not working hard enough? Do you think that's rude?